Have had s10+ for a few days as a replacement for the s9+ - both exynos versions
I have noticed the preliminary test on AT from Andrei and also a few other online and even if my usecase is very personal and its subjective results i think they are important to add to the picture.
During installation procedure and updating the phone it got warm and slowed down and in that sense it performs as you can tell from many test, but for normal light workload i think its an entirely different picture that emerges.
My usecase is comprising of www surfing for typically several hrs, a few light apps like trello/upwork/reddit and stuff like that and sometimes watching a video for an hour or two. No gaming og heavy video rendering what not.
Besides from the surfing heavy pages, the load is light but i use it way to many hrs, so the s9+ seldom lasted all the day and almost each day had to recharge. And i even ran it in power saving mode because it just blow the battery to fast in normal mode.
For surfing the s9+ often got warm and even light apps seemed to hit battery life.
Even without power saving mode the S10+ last an entire day without the slightest problems. Its not comparable.
I dont know power usage for my load, and the s10+ battery is bigger, but my guess is the cpu draw is next to half if not far less. In practical use for my usecase its a radical change.
For speed the phone is much faster. Its faster all over and when you give it a heavy www page to load it just hammers it nearly instantly.
I dont know how others usecase mirrors mine, but its interesting for me to know how often those M3 cores must have booted up on the S9. It seems like the M4 are standing idle much of the time and even the a55 is taking a bigger toll and leaving most of the rest to the a75. Then the M4 can stay idle and be cool and ready when they are asked to deliver.
For my usecase i am convinced. Its the biggest yearly generational cpu upgrade in a phone i have experienced. Granted the 9810 was lousy but still the 9810 just delivers in a way the bm numbers dont seem to indicate. I am sure if you use it for video editing and some heavy loads you will get the same old battery buring M core results, but how much real world workloads for most users is like that?
I have noticed the preliminary test on AT from Andrei and also a few other online and even if my usecase is very personal and its subjective results i think they are important to add to the picture.
During installation procedure and updating the phone it got warm and slowed down and in that sense it performs as you can tell from many test, but for normal light workload i think its an entirely different picture that emerges.
My usecase is comprising of www surfing for typically several hrs, a few light apps like trello/upwork/reddit and stuff like that and sometimes watching a video for an hour or two. No gaming og heavy video rendering what not.
Besides from the surfing heavy pages, the load is light but i use it way to many hrs, so the s9+ seldom lasted all the day and almost each day had to recharge. And i even ran it in power saving mode because it just blow the battery to fast in normal mode.
For surfing the s9+ often got warm and even light apps seemed to hit battery life.
Even without power saving mode the S10+ last an entire day without the slightest problems. Its not comparable.
I dont know power usage for my load, and the s10+ battery is bigger, but my guess is the cpu draw is next to half if not far less. In practical use for my usecase its a radical change.
For speed the phone is much faster. Its faster all over and when you give it a heavy www page to load it just hammers it nearly instantly.
I dont know how others usecase mirrors mine, but its interesting for me to know how often those M3 cores must have booted up on the S9. It seems like the M4 are standing idle much of the time and even the a55 is taking a bigger toll and leaving most of the rest to the a75. Then the M4 can stay idle and be cool and ready when they are asked to deliver.
For my usecase i am convinced. Its the biggest yearly generational cpu upgrade in a phone i have experienced. Granted the 9810 was lousy but still the 9810 just delivers in a way the bm numbers dont seem to indicate. I am sure if you use it for video editing and some heavy loads you will get the same old battery buring M core results, but how much real world workloads for most users is like that?