Samsung 244T vs Eizo S2410W which to get?

[argoldst]

I have narrowed my search for a new widescreen lcd down to the samsung 244T and the Eizo S2410W.

Sadly there is not too much information about either monitor out. Which would you recommend and why?

 

[argoldst]

anyone?

 

[otispunkmeyer]

i think eizo's are great and i think i read some where that they are calibrated by hand at the end of the manufacturing line. so the build and Image quality is pretty good.

 

[bunnyfubbles]

whichever one is cheaper, they both have similar specs, other than asthetics I'd say price would be your biggest deciding factor. If you've found any reviews on either, then you might want to go on that but just based on specs alone they both look solid. Hopefully these specs aren't too exagerated as both of these monitors look very killer, 1920x1200 = the sweetness and I can't wait to get one that's better in all areas (including response time) than my current 19"er.

 

[argoldst]

anyone else? I would love to hear from someone who has used or seen one of these lcd's.

 

[xtknight]

Haven't used them, but the Eizo may deliver a better picture because it's calibrated at the factory. Also might have some better ergonomics, etc.

 

[sxr7171]

But what difference does it make when using DVI?

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: sxr7171
But what difference does it make when using DVI?

You mean in terms of colors?

DVI will deliver perfect geometry and the right data 100% of the time, but we're adjusting how the colors are outputted on the panel.

 

[sxr7171]

Originally posted by: xtknight

Originally posted by: sxr7171
But what difference does it make when using DVI?

You mean in terms of colors?

DVI will deliver perfect geometry and the right data 100% of the time, but we're adjusting how the colors are outputted on the panel.

Still don't you have to calibrate it at the video card level when you get it for the application and video card you are using?

 

[Ethyriel]

I came across this thread in a google search because I'm considering the exact same options right now, so I decided to register. I haven't seen the monitors yet.

From what I understand, it's only the ColorEdge series from Eizo which are hand calibrated at the factory. This is why the things cost about 4-8x more than the S, L, and M models.

The S2410W does, however, still have internal 14bit color calculations and 6 color controls. It also has neat little things like electrostatic buttons and brightness stabilization like in the powerbooks, and of course the 5 year warranty. I'm also expecting the Eizo to have a more even backlight. I doubt the Samsung will be bad, but it's just something I'd expect Eizo to put extra effort into.

For only about $200 more, I'm leaning heavily towards the Eizo. But then, if you buy before I do in February-March, I'd love to hear some critiques on whichever you choose.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: sxr7171

Originally posted by: xtknight

Originally posted by: sxr7171
But what difference does it make when using DVI?

You mean in terms of colors?

DVI will deliver perfect geometry and the right data 100% of the time, but we're adjusting how the colors are outputted on the panel.

Still don't you have to calibrate it at the video card level when you get it for the application and video card you are using?

Gamma? Yes, that still applies to both VGA and DVI. It's application-independent unless the application adjusts gamma. Calibrate what though?

 

[sting808]

Came to the same 2 of 3 contenders. Sony 234, Samsung 244T, and Eizo s2410W.

I don't mind investing $$$ in long term investment. That's why I bought the Sony GDMs at the time.

I have the Dell 2405 at work and use it for spreadsheets, diagrams, and CAD. It's a great 24" for the price, but "ok" in overall performance.

I'm concerned about the 3 frame overdrive processing that has been speculated to cause lag in display. Not the ghosting or afterglow that people experience.

Anyone gamers bought the S2410W and see lag? If so, is the lag manageable? I believe TASC replied in here and at Hard forum regarding his 244T experience. I'm hoping the Eizo modifications to the Samsung design has improved the performance of the panel.

Already got feedback regarding color accuracy for graphics use from other forums. Eizo tech support says buy it from a reputable dealer and return it if it doesn't work for me. Problem is I'm in Hawaii and I'll take a hit on shipping twice, plus restocking.

I know I may end up using dual monitors if I get to "anal". Not fair to compare to Sony 19" and 21" CRTs.

Comments on Samsung or the Eizo in terms of gaming?

 

[darXoul]

Samsung's advantages: HDCP compliance, MUCH better performance in games (in terms of ghosting, the 6 ms panel really does make a difference - at least on the Acer AL2416W, it does), lower price, from what I heard also better backlight uniformity.

Possible issue: input lag (I didn't have the opportunity to test).

I don't think I'd buy the Eizo, as a gamer.

 

[sting808]

Thanks.

I don't really care about HDCP from my computers. I've read about the Acer 2416, but too bad color accuracy is poor and it only has VGA.

The Samsung 244 and Eizo S2410W supposedly uses the same PVA panels. I would like to have 1 large mult-purpose display so the Eizo would fit that role. If the lag is same or worse than the 244, than I'd probably buy the Eizo and possibly a VX922 to game.

Meaning, if forced to buy dedicated monitors, I'd go for the Eizo since it's only $200 more. This is over a 5-7 year period. All my most recent CRTs have been at least $900 so not a big deal. They've lasted years.

Maybe I just need to take the plunge and bite the bullet. Hell, I bought a Voodoo Rush back in the day and replaced it with a dedicated Monster 3D.