• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Saddam's WMD hidden in Syria, says Iraq survey chief(Kay)

C

charrison

Lifer
linkage

David Kay, the former head of the coalition's hunt for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, yesterday claimed that part of Saddam Hussein's secret weapons programme was hidden in Syria.

In an exclusive interview with The Telegraph, Dr Kay, who last week resigned as head of the Iraq Survey Group, said that he had uncovered evidence that unspecified materials had been moved to Syria shortly before last year's war to overthrow Saddam.

"We are not talking about a large stockpile of weapons," he said. "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD programme. Precisely what went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that needs to be resolved."
Click to expand...


 
I don't get it? How does one know that something was moved without knowing what was moved? Did someone tell him that they are aware of something...just not sure what that something is?
 
Wait! Let me answer that: Reports that say something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know.

See?
 
Oh wait . This the Telegraph, right? The same people who broke the story of the now infamous memo? (btw, who linked that story 😉 ) Not saying this story is bogus also, just saying that, due to past articles by the Telegraph, questions should be asked before accepting this one. 😉
 
Originally posted by: Gaard
Oh wait . This the Telegraph, right? The same people who broke the story of the now infamous memo? (btw, who linked that story 😉 ) Not saying this story is bogus also, just saying that, due to past articles by the Telegraph, questions should be asked before accepting this one. 😉
Click to expand...

Yep. Charrison will say he "just posts the news", but curiously, he was the same poster that posted that other Telgraph "breaking story" about the memo you mentioned...
 
Puh-leeze! this won't even pass the sniff test, it reeks to high heaven.

Neither Kay nor the Admin in general has any more credibility concerning WMD's than a repeat child molester applying for a job at a daycare center...
 
i gnerally like to see multiple sources of info about something before i start giving it any credence. Even I take the Telegraph with a "grain of salt"
 
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: Gaard
Oh wait . This the Telegraph, right? The same people who broke the story of the now infamous memo? (btw, who linked that story 😉 ) Not saying this story is bogus also, just saying that, due to past articles by the Telegraph, questions should be asked before accepting this one. 😉
Click to expand...

Yep. Charrison will say he "just posts the news", but curiously, he was the same poster that posted that other Telgraph "breaking story" about the memo you mentioned...[/q[

Last time I checked they were both from legitimate sources....
Click to expand...
 
Everything (all reports) quotes Kay only.
Syria denies it (as expected).

Kay and compnay will need to present some actual documentation.

This scenario is very probable, both sides helping each other out. Similar scenario was in GWI where Iraq fighters were sent to Iran for protection.

There was probably no actual weapons shipped, just the equipment, critical components & research
 
Nuts and bolts?

charrison, I went thru your links, everyone of them on the front page. Almost everyone of them says something like "Kay reportedly told the British Telegraph...". And those that didn't mention the Telegraph (2 I think) didn't quote Kay...they only said something like "Kay said..."
Could you show me these differing sources?
 
Originally posted by: conehead433
After we take over Syria and don't find them there they will claim they are in Iran.
Click to expand...

We do not need to take over Syria. Just stop them from supporting the terrorist community.

Note that we did not take over Afganistan.

 
Originally posted by: conehead433
After we take over Syria and don't find them there they will claim they are in Iran.
Click to expand...

That's brilliant. These idiots need to get off this bandwagon unless you have photos of stacks of weapons and GPS coordinates at this point..and evern then I need some damn evidence that they intend to do something to us with them.

 
Originally posted by: Gaard
Nuts and bolts?

charrison, I went thru your links, everyone of them on the front page. Almost everyone of them says something like "Kay reportedly told the British Telegraph...". And those that didn't mention the Telegraph (2 I think) didn't quote Kay...they only said something like "Kay said..."
Could you show me these differing sources?
Click to expand...

This was an interview with the telegraph. I am sure there will be more to follow.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top