• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Saddam-Al Qaeda-9/11 link found. Libs still in denial.

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
I can already predict the Liberals response.

This doesn't prove anything! (The liberal response to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Liberals have so much emotional investment in Bush-Hating that anything that contradicts their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

The Connection
 
Well if I were Sadam and I was on Al Qaeda's hit list I definately would want somebody there at those meetings to see if I was going to get blown up in the near future!
 
Can he seriously post this stuff with a straight face? Is this story the only thing the neocons have to cling to?
These and other questions to be answered on, Life in a Parallel Universe, starring, hs....
 
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
I can already predict the Liberals response.

This doesn't prove anything! (The liberal response to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Liberals have so much emotional investment in Bush-Hating that anything that contradicts their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

The Connection
At least we can agree your feckless leader is a liar, given that he's said there was no connection. We just disagree on what he's lied about.




PS. :cookie;
 
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
I can already predict the Liberals response.

This doesn't prove anything! (The liberal response to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Liberals have so much emotional investment in Bush-Hating that anything that contradicts their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

The Connection
At least we can agree your feckless leader is a liar, given that he's said there was no connection. We just disagree on what he's lied about.




PS. :cookie;

BINGO! If Bush himself said there was no connection, exactly whose point are you trying to prove?
 
Is this a variation on the "2 degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon" game? Or just the weekly standard frothing up the faithful?

What does Bush himself have to say about it?

"I can't make that claim."

From here-

http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/no-saddam-qaeda.htm

Which, of course, should be the end of it, but No! The uber right is defending positions the Admin abandoned long ago...

Repetition is the key to indoctrination, apparently.
 
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: conjur
<yawn>


OOOOOOLLLLLD news


USA Today reported it in Oct. 2002


http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-10-02-us-iraq-alqaeda_x.htm

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3540586/



Nothing new here, folks.


More desperation from our resident Quack.


More info:

http://www.spinsanity.org/post.html?2003_11_23_archive.html

Did you read the article? There are quite a few references, not just the one you point out.




<YAAAAWWNNNN>
 
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
I can already predict the Liberals response.

This doesn't prove anything! (The liberal response to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Liberals have so much emotional investment in Bush-Hating that anything that contradicts their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

The Connection


This post absurd in many ways and is no different than the following:

Title: Scientists discover Bush is a gay sh*t-eating cockroach from outspace hiding in a human carcass

I can predict the conservatives response.

"This doesn't prove anything. (The conservative reponse to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Conservatives have so much investment in cockroach loving that anything that contradict their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

[Link to wildly partisan source]
 
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
I can already predict the Liberals response.

This doesn't prove anything! (The liberal response to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Liberals have so much emotional investment in Bush-Hating that anything that contradicts their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

The Connection

Oh you showed up HS. You are a tired, lonely little man, aren't cha? Keep digging, eventually you will find the reminants of your damaged brain.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
just the facts biys [sic]....
Only if by facts you mean wild conjecture, rhetoric, and unfounded claims.
Yes, I believe that is the official Bush administration definintion of "facts". Anyone remember, "These are facts, not assertions."?


That's the Bushies in a nutshell: wrong is right, down is up, bad is good, Bush is God. :evil:
 
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
I can already predict the Liberals response.

This doesn't prove anything! (The liberal response to just about any fact that contradicts what they believe)

Liberals have so much emotional investment in Bush-Hating that anything that contradicts their beliefs just has to be wrong!

Read it and weep.

The Connection

Cool 😎 , just goes more in line with my prediction of we eventually just turning the whole sand region into glass. That ought to do the trick, right? Then you'd be happy :thumbsup:
 
The Shakir story is perhaps the government's strongest indication that Saddam and al Qaeda may have worked together on September 11. It is far from conclusive; conceivably there were two Ahmed Hikmat Shakirs. And in itself, the evidence does not show that Saddam Hussein personally had foreknowledge of the attacks. Still--like the long, on-again-off-again relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda--it cannot be dismissed.

Far from conclusive you say? Yup, HS this proves nothing.

*Cookie*
 
Where did HS go?

Since he posted it, it obviously is right. I'm hoping he can come back and explain the Al Qaeda-Iraq link to us.
 
It is gettng harder and harder to believe anything from our Govt.

The guy who killed Nicholas Berg? We supposedly killed him over a year ago.. but NOW he is alive and well.. hmm

Strange that Berg and Mousuai were aquainted in the past and now Berg was killed by al-qaeda?
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
It is gettng harder and harder to believe anything from our Govt.

The guy who killed Nicholas Berg? We supposedly killed him over a year ago.. but NOW he is alive and well.. hmm

Strange that Berg and Mousuai were aquainted in the past and now Berg was killed by al-qaeda?

Why would you believe anything from our government? If politicians told the truth and acted in the best interest of the country, our current political structure wouldn't be needed.
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
It is gettng harder and harder to believe anything from our Govt.

The guy who killed Nicholas Berg? We supposedly killed him over a year ago.. but NOW he is alive and well.. hmm

Strange that Berg and Mousuai were aquainted in the past and now Berg was killed by al-qaeda?

I've heard about this Al Qaeda ghost before, if someone could provide news links for the lazy, it would be much appreciated.

Zephyr
 
Back
Top