Charlie from SemiAccurate posted his thoughts on the 300 series, and it is scathing!
Here's an excerpt from his article entitled "AMD outs Caribbean Islands aka R9 300 Series GPUs: How to Lose But Not Gracefully"
Use proper citation format when posting troll threads here.
-- stahlhart
Here's an excerpt from his article entitled "AMD outs Caribbean Islands aka R9 300 Series GPUs: How to Lose But Not Gracefully"
SemiAccurate said:Come on, really? Are they this bad?
Did they really have to sink that low? Yes they did because the performance is really that bad. No it isn’t that bad, it is just priced too high for what it competes against, much too high. For the ‘real benchmarks’, AMD shows the 390 up against a Radeon HD7950 and a GTX 660 Ti, not anything it would be up against for real. The 390X is likewise shown head to head against similarly obsolete cards, the HD7970 and the GTX 670. It does beat both dinosaurs by large margins in an unspecified test with specifics buried in the footnotes dozens of slides later. If there was a Windows 8 driver for a Tseng Labs ET4000, I am pretty sure AMD would have dug one out to round out this ‘fair’ comparison. Worse yet it is saying that Nvidia not just pummels the new 300-series rebrands, they pummel it by being more efficient with a vastly cheaper to produce memory interface. Brilliant own goal there.
Use proper citation format when posting troll threads here.
-- stahlhart
Last edited by a moderator:
