S@H Poll - Whose still running v3.03 & who has switched to v3.08?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,695
4,658
75
I just institued the 3.03/3.08 combo on my machine, with a cutoff of 0.1 angle range. Got my first VLAR in under 4 hours! :)

BTW, Did anyone ever figure out the best cutoff?
 

Polo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,185
0
0
Berkeley adress in the etc/hosts and hop... ;) No more security hole. :)

And 3.03 is much faster... :)
 

Spacehead

Lifer
Jun 2, 2002
13,067
9,858
136
Originally posted by: Ken_g6
I just institued the 3.03/3.08 combo on my machine, with a cutoff
of 0.1 angle range. Got my first VLAR in under 4 hours! :)

BTW, Did anyone ever figure out the best cutoff?
It's definately below 0.235:
v3.03 - 3:37:59
v3.08 - 4:06:36

I haven't found a WU in the 0.1xx range to test(same WU, both clients), but looking through my WU history
both version appear to process 0.1xx WU's in about the same time.
v3.08 definatley kicks butt on 0.0xx WU's. Most WU's with AR's between 0.001 & 0.155 have processed in about 3:35 so far. :)
I seem to be getting alot of 0.004 AR WU's with the reobserved WU's so things are working out nicely.