S@H on a AMD64 FX

[SilverBack]

I didn't see this posted anywhere for you guys to see, so here you go.

Benchmark, Outstanding

Article linkage 🙂

 

[lobadobadingdong]

nice, the only thing to note is the p4 can do 2 at a time. they aren't as fast, but the p4 will do some 60% more WU's a day.

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
nice, the only thing to note is the p4 can do 2 at a time. they aren't as fast, but the p4 will do some 60% more WU's a day.

Very true (Don't jump in here Confused...😉 )..

My 3.2 averages 2:54 per WU...but does 2 in that amount of time.....🙂

Wonder if the 64 FX will run much faster with 64bit client (or streamlined 64 bit OS)....? 🙂

 

[Assimilator1]

1.75hrs/WU is still pretty sweet though😀

*me goades confused*
Ah,dont worry Engineer he's too chicken to😉😉😀

 

[lobadobadingdong]

i hope berkley puts out a 64-bit client for it, I agree with engineer, and figure it should cut time to completion of a WU nearly in 1/2.

 

[Jeff7181]

Is there a 64-bit client for SETI yet?

 

[InlineFive]

Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
i hope berkley puts out a 64-bit client for it, I agree with engineer, and figure it should cut time to completion of a WU nearly in 1/2.

You would need a 64-Bit OS and Drivers for that to work properly.

 

[Overkiller]

my P4 2.8 is now @ 3.2 with ram @ 230 mhz...so i want to see how many Wu i can do 😀

 

[InlineFive]

Originally posted by: Overkiller
my P4 2.8 is now @ 3.2 with ram @ 230 mhz...so i want to see how many Wu i can do 😀

Make sure to run two clients. 🙂

 

[Overkiller]

but of course 😀

 

[Assimilator1]

Yep ,he is!😀

Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Is there a 64-bit client for SETI yet?

They won't bother with S@H1 seeing as that's ending soon ,but I guess they might once S@H2 has been out for a while🙂

 

[Accord99]

There's a x86-64 version of the SETI client, but its slower than the 32-bit version.
http://www.amdzone.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=1315&page=2

 

[Assimilator1]

Thanks for that info🙂

I stand corrected!😛