• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

S@H: Close at the top.

D

Darkone

Senior member
1) Corban Systems User Group 24720 27.63 years 9 hr 47 min 33.7 sec
2) The_One 24719 23.50 years 8 hr 19 min 40.1 sec
3) ColinP 24702 30.07 years 10 hr 39 min 50.9 sec


18 work units seperating the top 3 with only 1 seperating 1st and 2nd! 🙂

Way to go peeps... makes life interesting 🙂

D
 
heh not 5 minutes later its :-

1) The_One 24720 23.50 years 8 hr 19 min 40.8 sec
2) Corban Systems User Group 24720 27.63 years 9 hr 47 min 33.7 sec
3) ColinP 24702 30.07 years 10 hr 39 min 50.9 sec


🙂 Congrats to both Corban and T1..


 
Congrats to Corban Systems User Group (cory) for the shortlived time at the #1 position. Maybe you weren't there long but at least you can say you've been there! 😉

Congrats to The_One on taking over the #1 spot. Hope you've got the 3.03 client and SetiQ problems worked out.

Rob
 
what happened to the_one's production?

i know mine was down cause i still had another dozen machines
that i did not switch over until this week.
(i have another 20 or so that i could add when i get around to
it)

i just got a bunch of equipment from one of the customers
of my office furniture business that was closing its doors.

4 gateway 7200 servers running windows nt 4.0
4 hp jornada 690 handheld computers
3 proxim rangelan2 acces points (wireless network hubs)
4 proxim rangelan2 7410 windows ce cards
1 nec projector with tripod screen
(makes a real nice 6 foot screen for the
computer or tv)
1 10/100 16 port switch
3 10/100 hubs
2 10 hubs
2 10/20 gig scsi tape drives with about 40 tapes
1 hp 4050n laser printer
1 xerox laser printer
and a bunch of other stuff.
i figure i got about $35000 worth of stuff and
most of it was only a few months old (some not even a month).
the projector was only 8 months old and they payed
about $4000 for that.

i have so many new toys to play with now. the wireless
networking is pretty neat. i can have the little jornada
with the wireless card access my dsl connection for surfing
the internet or running a terminal program or
even run pc anywhere to control a pc.

this is one of the reasons i have not gotten around to
getting some of the machines switched over to seti or the
20 that are not running it yet.
 
cory, heheheh... playing with your toys instead of getting all those new goodies running seti eh?
Well, lifes no fun without playtime - have a great time and then GET SETI GOING ON ALL THAT STUFF!
I'm actually pretty jealous, that really sounds like a load of fun!
 
Cory

Wow! thats a LOT of gear you've got there! ,alot of nice gear :Q🙂
Congrats on your brief stint as No1 TA member 🙂 (do ya think you can sneak it back for a little while? 😉)

The_One
Congrats bud ,what took you so long? 😉 ,BTW don't think because your No1 in TA that I will become your servant & clean out your flat! 😉😛 hehehe
 

i am number 1 now and have been for most of the day.

at least until the_one gets the output up to where
it was.
 
Damn new version of SetiQ iz S*1t, not impressed at all, i must have lost a weeks worth of production, how crap iz dat???? anyway sussed it now (between me and d1) if you have any Qs pertaining to a version other than 3.03 it wont download ANY WUs for ANY client, destructions and usage of this new version of Q izn't what i'd call good, /me misses the old version, personaly i dont give a monkeys about different client types and seperating the Qs seems dumb to me but matey seems to think theres a valid reason! I have mailed him to say as much, still no response, don't suppose i'll get one either (i was a little more polite in the Email by the way). The other thing, whats with the email thing, dont seem to do anything, have i missed a setting somewhere for an SMTP server? cos i dint see anything in the small amount of destructions! Any thoughts anyone?
 
I seem to remember the e-mail function only working if you're running it on Windows 2000... Although I can't remember what it actually does e-mail out ....

JHutch
 
oh and i did get a response from matey although it dint actually say anything more than the web site (automated perhaps?)...

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Reneris
Sent: 08 February 2001 00:45
To: Russ Bathurst
Subject: RE: SetiQ v3.03



1. The CPU usage thing is fixed in beta3.

2. The separate queues keep seti@home happy as the have revisioning
issues where when the send a WU they don't necessarily want a different
clients processing them.

3. If the status bar says "idle" then there's nothing to do and hance
the "connect now" option is grayed.

- Ken

---- MSG END -----
my msg (you may notice the questions wern't all answered):
I'm currently using 3.03Beta3a (started using beta2a)

It all looks very pretty but i prefered the old one, nice simple and it
worked, why is it neccesary to have a different q for each type of
client, winnt, solaris 2.6,2.7,2.8, linux etc etc, so that when a q runs
out for a particular client type it wont get any more WUs even though
there maybe plenty of WUs in a q for another type, this is not good.

For some reason today, Q is telling me that the seti server has 'run out
of work units' i find this hard to believe, seeing as if i dont point a
client (running on the same machine) to the Q it gets a unit fine, yet
the q is empty (for that client version) and it wont get any more for
the reason above.

Why is the connect now option under the file menu always greyed out in
the gui and it doesn't even have the option in the web interface, plus
the connect option on SQ.exe is very confusing, what does it actually
mean?

To sum up i miss the old version of q, pretty as this one may be, its
loseing me loads of WUs!

On another note, a freind of mine is running 3.03Beta2a on a machine and
it eats 12-16% of the CPU most of the time!

Any thoughts/comments/solutions? Like how i can get the old version to
work with the new clients and seti servers, because i think this is the
most efficient way of doing things!


Russ

 
i am still using the old .78 setiq. it works so
i have not messed with it

i am back in top spot.

it seems that we will be trading it back and forth
until you get your production back up. or i setup
those other 20 or so machines.
 
I'm still running SetiQ .78 myself. After the hosts file editing it works fine with 3.03. I know I'm jinxing myself but I *still* haven't had a SetiQ crash at work or at home. All systems are 24/7 and are rarely rebooted. I don't have any need for the new SetiQ features so as long as the latest client still connects through it I'm sticking with it.

Hopefully cory & The_One will get those numbers back up. You two don't want me to beat you in the weekly numbers do you? 😉

Rob
 
The_One
Don't forget bud it's just an early Beta version (in time wise not v numbers!😛)

BTW I also have the old SETIQ running no probs🙂

I just added this to my hosts file

128.32.18.166 shserver.ssl.berkeley.edu
128.32.18.166 shserver2.ssl.berkeley.edu



 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top