RX-7 fans.....check this....

[warcrow]

!

 

[fs5]

chop

 

[notfred]

Interesting photoshopping.

 

[PowerMac4Ever]

All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

 

[fs5]

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

DIE! (on the slow part at least)

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

 

[Mallow]

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

lol

 

[notfred]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

A mustang owner because that would make the RX-7 look slow and unreliable in comparison?

 

[Triumph]

I got the joke! The joke is that they're all driving on the wrong side of the road. Right?

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

A mustang owner because that would make the RX-7 look slow and unreliable in comparison?

No. Mustang owners usually dislike RX-7s. Mostly b/c if jealousy. RX-7 is lighter, faster, better looking, and handles better (stock). But we won;t talk about the new GTR Thats one bad mother.

 

[PowerMac4Ever]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

Mustangs can pwn RX-7s in speed and quality noob

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: Triumph
I got the joke! The joke is that they're all driving on the wrong side of the road. Right?

nono...that they're not using their signals

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

Mustangs can pwn RX-7s in speed and quality noob

LMAO! Thats for the display of immaturity. You know when someone is backed into a corner when they resort to name calling.

 

[thomsbrain]

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

Mustangs can pwn RX-7s in speed and quality noob

mustangs and quality go together like oil and water. the rx7 might not be much better, but i still see a lot of them driving around, even the ancient ones.

 

[notfred]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

A mustang owner because that would make the RX-7 look slow and unreliable in comparison?

No. Mustang owners usually dislike RX-7s. Mostly b/c if jealousy. RX-7 is lighter, faster, better looking, and handles better (stock). But we won;t talk about the new GTR Thats one bad mother.

I'm a mustang owner. The RX-7 is one of the few japanese sportscars I do like. How fast is a stock 3rd Gen RX-7, anyway?

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

Mustangs can pwn RX-7s in speed and quality noob

Not in handling!

 

[fs5]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

Mustangs can pwn RX-7s in speed and quality noob

LMAO! Thats for the display of immaturity. You know when someone is backed into a corner when they resort to name calling.

quality wise the rotary engine does tend to blow itself up often after 100,000.

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

A mustang owner because that would make the RX-7 look slow and unreliable in comparison?

No. Mustang owners usually dislike RX-7s. Mostly b/c if jealousy. RX-7 is lighter, faster, better looking, and handles better (stock). But we won;t talk about the new GTR Thats one bad mother.

I'm a mustang owner. The RX-7 is one of the few japanese sportscars I do like. How fast is a stock 3rd Gen RX-7, anyway?

Define fast? If we're talking HP? Here are some specs:

The Specs:
1993 Mazda RX-7


Market segment: High-performance sports car
Typical market competition: Dodge Stealth R/T Turbo, Toyota Supra Turbo, Nissan 300ZX Turbo, Chevrolet Corvette LT1
Engine: two-rotor Wankel, sequential twin turbocharged, intercooled; 255 horsepower at 6,500 r.p.m.; torque rated at 217 ft.-lbs. at 5,000 r.p.m.
Transmission: five-speed manual, with optional four-speed automatic
Steering: rack-and-pinion, variable power-assisted
Brakes: front discs/rear discs, power-assisted with standard anti-lock braking system (ABS)
Tires: P225/50VR16 radials
Wheelbase: 2,425 mm or 95.5 in
Curb weight: manual 1,269 kg or 2,797 lbs.; automatic 1,300 kg or 2,866 lbs
Fuel consumption: Litres/100 kilometres, city/hwy--manual 14.1/9.4 (20/30 mpg), automatic 13.4/9.7 (21/29 mpg)

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: fivespeed5

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

Mustangs can pwn RX-7s in speed and quality noob

LMAO! Thats for the display of immaturity. You know when someone is backed into a corner when they resort to name calling.

quality wise the rotary engine does tend to blow itself up often after 100,000.

Well, you do have to baby it and change the oil *every* 2500-3000 religiously. If so, it will last beyond 100,000.

 

[RagingBITCH]

Fast as in what does it do in the 1/4 stock?

 

[notfred]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

A mustang owner because that would make the RX-7 look slow and unreliable in comparison?

No. Mustang owners usually dislike RX-7s. Mostly b/c if jealousy. RX-7 is lighter, faster, better looking, and handles better (stock). But we won;t talk about the new GTR Thats one bad mother.

I'm a mustang owner. The RX-7 is one of the few japanese sportscars I do like. How fast is a stock 3rd Gen RX-7, anyway?

Define fast? If we're talking HP? Here are some specs:

The Specs:
1993 Mazda RX-7


Market segment: High-performance sports car
Typical market competition: Dodge Stealth R/T Turbo, Toyota Supra Turbo, Nissan 300ZX Turbo, Chevrolet Corvette LT1
Engine: two-rotor Wankel, sequential twin turbocharged, intercooled; 255 horsepower at 6,500 r.p.m.; torque rated at 217 ft.-lbs. at 5,000 r.p.m.
Transmission: five-speed manual, with optional four-speed automatic
Steering: rack-and-pinion, variable power-assisted
Brakes: front discs/rear discs, power-assisted with standard anti-lock braking system (ABS)
Tires: P225/50VR16 radials
Wheelbase: 2,425 mm or 95.5 in
Curb weight: manual 1,269 kg or 2,797 lbs.; automatic 1,300 kg or 2,866 lbs
Fuel consumption: Litres/100 kilometres, city/hwy--manual 14.1/9.4 (20/30 mpg), automatic 13.4/9.7 (21/29 mpg)

So, you can tell me that it's "Faster than a mustang" but you can't tell me anything about how fast it is? I didn't ask what kind of steering it had or what tires came on it.

Speed is defined as distance/time. Often when comparing cars, this is seconds/quarter mile. Can you tell me how fast it is?

 

[StageLeft]

1/4 won't be its strong point, but when the car came out it had the best handling of anything even close to it in cost. I seem to recall it was well into the .90 G for handling, and that you needed a chiropractor if you drove it much

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
All I see are a bunch of slow unreliable cars

Slow? Unreliable? LMAO! Must me a mustang owner.

A mustang owner because that would make the RX-7 look slow and unreliable in comparison?

No. Mustang owners usually dislike RX-7s. Mostly b/c if jealousy. RX-7 is lighter, faster, better looking, and handles better (stock). But we won;t talk about the new GTR Thats one bad mother.

I'm a mustang owner. The RX-7 is one of the few japanese sportscars I do like. How fast is a stock 3rd Gen RX-7, anyway?

Define fast? If we're talking HP? Here are some specs:

The Specs:
1993 Mazda RX-7


Market segment: High-performance sports car
Typical market competition: Dodge Stealth R/T Turbo, Toyota Supra Turbo, Nissan 300ZX Turbo, Chevrolet Corvette LT1
Engine: two-rotor Wankel, sequential twin turbocharged, intercooled; 255 horsepower at 6,500 r.p.m.; torque rated at 217 ft.-lbs. at 5,000 r.p.m.
Transmission: five-speed manual, with optional four-speed automatic
Steering: rack-and-pinion, variable power-assisted
Brakes: front discs/rear discs, power-assisted with standard anti-lock braking system (ABS)
Tires: P225/50VR16 radials
Wheelbase: 2,425 mm or 95.5 in
Curb weight: manual 1,269 kg or 2,797 lbs.; automatic 1,300 kg or 2,866 lbs
Fuel consumption: Litres/100 kilometres, city/hwy--manual 14.1/9.4 (20/30 mpg), automatic 13.4/9.7 (21/29 mpg)

So, you can tell me that it's "Faster than a mustang" but you can't tell me anything about how fast it is? I didn't ask what kind of steering it had or what tires came on it.

Speed is defined as distance/time. Often when comparing cars, this is seconds/quarter mile. Can you tell me how fast it is?

Obviously the stats I've already provided to you displays the HP rating (255) a weight (2,797lbs). Personally, with my rebuild (engine, no mods except a bigger all aluminum radiator) is 11.21. I've only taken it to the track 3 times, and that was my best, another RX-7 down there on the same day bested me with 9.6 (i think).

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
1/4 won't be its strong point, but when the car came out it had the best handling of anything even close to it in cost. I seem to recall it was well into the .90 G for handling, and that you needed a chiropractor if you drove it much

Yea, it handles really well. The fast you drive, the closer it hugs the road. Its fun a fun drive, no doubt.

 

[notfred]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Obviously the stats I've already provided to you displays the HP rating (255) a weight (2,797lbs). Personally, with my rebuild (engine, no mods except a bigger all aluminum radiator) is 11.21. I've only taken it to the track 3 times, and that was my best, another RX-7 down there on the same day bested me with 9.6 (i think).

I'm sorry, did you just tell me your totally stock 225HP car ran 11.21 in the 1/4 mile?