I'll have to chew on that. But Einstein said something concerning learning being about learning how to think, not master the herding and maintenance of factual information. There are different kinds of thinking. It's here:
I would say that the kind of thinking Einstein was engaged in was problem focused. The kink of thinking I was referring to might be similar but existential focused. What is the meaning of life. Is there a mental state that puts to bed doubt fear and insecurity. Can one be happy without belief in lies. Is there truth that is absolute, perhaps something called enlightenment.
These are things that are the result of questioning what we have been taught, not unlike noticing there is something amiss in the Newtonian analysis of the orbit of Mercury, or what makes people despair.
Commonalities I see are a curiosity or dissatisfaction with all the know answers, that they can’t actually end the need to quest. Once one abandons the known as satisfactory, a new potential opens up. One begins a journey of discovery with a fresh outlook. This is difficult when what one was taught to believe is sacred and must never be questioned.
This is where all one tells oneself to stay in that box consists of thought generated by fear.
At this point all of the factual knowledge one has acquired and will learn driven by the need to know may form the foundation of inspiration, a sudden realization, a connection of things that one never imagined, an intuitive leap produced, I suspect, in a non linguistic part of the brain that leaks through to the conscious mind in revert or even in sleep, or at times of tremendous shifts in mental concentration. Those Eureka type moments.
A few years ago I was working on fixing up my house and would focus on some sort of problem, like how I was going to hang heavy cabinets by myself on the wall. I would focus on the problem and go to sleep and wake the next day with the answer. Naturally, for me it helps keeping my problems simple.
.
So I would say that learning to think involves unlearning what we think thinking is. Real thinking leads one into the wilderness, the unknown, the collapse of unconscious assumptions. I think it is as much feeling as thought, allowing something within us to happen we were warned was dangerous to express. Perhaps that is where dissatisfaction or deep curiosity come into play, some inner drive that burns.
One problem I believe is assuming we know the truth or that we can know it by ordinary means. I think this is what is meant in Zen by “Before mountains were mountains but with exposure to Zen mountains weren’t mountains any more, but with enlightenment mountains are just mountains again.” That’s just my words for it, not a quote from whoever it was that spoke of mountains.
Edit: not too far off:
Before one studies Zen, mountains are mountains and waters are waters; after a first glimpse into the truth of Zen, mountains are no longer mountains and...
www.goodreads.com