I mean sure, if Ukraine wants them then go for it... but that has got to be scraping the barrel. Can't we find tanks that are less than 50 years old to send?Some rumblings about Leopard 1s starting to surface. Euro nations rumored to be talking to Rheinmetall and a Belgian arms dealer. Same arms dealer had M109s that the UK purchased, reconditioned, and shipped to Ukraine.
One of the reasons Ukraine is low on 125mm tank ammo is that they're using them a lot for indirect fire. The Russians are doing this too. A modestly refreshed Leopard 1 with new radios, whatever ERA is laying around, and a thermal scope would be fine for this role and as a self propelled assault gun. No I wouldn't want to run up on like the better T-72s or T-80s in one but I doubt they'd use them like that.I mean sure, if Ukraine wants them then go for it... but that has got to be scraping the barrel. Can't we find tanks that are less than 50 years old to send?
If I was the UK I'd probably abandon the Challenger 3 project, ship the Challenger 2s to Ukraine, lease M1s from the US, and buy either the K2 or Abrams X.EDIT: Hell, give the Leopard 1s to our army, and let Ukraine have every Challenger 2.
The cost of building a few hundred at most bespoke MBTs is just nuts. If the UK can't get the export deals to build more then yeah I would agree time to move to another platform.If I was the UK I'd probably abandon the Challenger 3 project, ship the Challenger 2s to Ukraine, lease M1s from the US, and buy either the K2 or Abrams X.
The wailing from the certain circles would be epically loud but would eventually subside.
NATO needs to get better at standardising on a design and then manufacturing locally. There's no reason why France, Germany, and the UK should be producing incompatible designs, and it just complicates things. Cooperate on a design, share the IP, and build up the capacity to produce it locally in multiple countries.The cost of building a few hundred at most bespoke MBTs is just nuts. If the UK can't get the export deals to build more then yeah I would agree time to move to another platform.
Dozens of programs have attempted to do that and typically fall apart over countries running out of money or not being satisfied with how the work is going to be split up so they go their own way.NATO needs to get better at standardising on a design and then manufacturing locally. There's no reason why France, Germany, and the UK should be producing incompatible designs, and it just complicates things. Cooperate on a design, share the IP, and build up the capacity to produce it locally in multiple countries.
It worked for Tornado and Typhoon. Current events are a good example of why they should try harder. Warsaw Pact equipment is so ubiquitous and interoperable that both Ukraine and Russia are widely using it- meanwhile, NATO are providing 12 of this type, 30 of that type, etc.Dozens of programs have attempted to do that and typically fall apart over countries running out of money or not being satisfied with how the work is going to be split up so they go their own way.
You know what’s worse than supply chain issues with your new tanks limiting their utility a bit? No tanks at all.Ukraine will soon have 4 additional types of MBTs in addition to whatever Soviet mbt they are currently using:
14 Challenger2 (uk)
Lots of leopards (germany, poland, etc)
31 abrams (usa)
Leclerc (France)
i can see supply chain issues:
all the different types of ammo, spare parts, fuel, etc
Simply give the different types to different commands in different regions. Don't try to mix and match, and the logistics will at least not be tangled.You know what’s worse than supply chain issues with your new tanks limiting their utility a bit? No tanks at all.
LeClerc, Leopard 2 and Abrams all use the same main gun ammo 120mm. Challenger 2 has a rifled 120mm gun which uses different ammo.Ukraine will soon have 4 additional types of MBTs in addition to whatever Soviet mbt they are currently using:
14 Challenger2 (uk)
Lots of leopards (germany, poland, etc)
31 abrams (usa)
Leclerc (France)
i can see supply chain issues:
all the different types of ammo, spare parts, fuel, etc
I think the Leopard and the Abrams are the only tanks that can be sent in actual usable quantities to make it worth Ukraine's while to setup a logistical tail for them. In a perfect world it would just be the Leopard but that would require a lot more Leopards than are actually available and the US has a lot of Abrams in storage.Kinda hoping the French don’t send the Leclerc and just pay for overhauls of all the Spanish 2A4s or something instead. Some of them need a lot of work to be usable.
The limited number of available 3rd gen tanks might be part of the reason they still want to get ahold of Leopard 1s. There are easily hundreds to be had. Ukraine’s T series fleets have surely taken a beating over the last year and face availability issues. This would be a reasonable stopgap.I think the Leopard and the Abrams are the only tanks that can be sent in actual usable quantities to make it worth Ukraine's while to setup a logistical tail for them. In a perfect world it would just be the Leopard but that would require a lot more Leopards than are actually available and the US has a lot of Abrams in storage.
Sweden is sending 50 CV90s which are excellent IFVs and about 20 Archer 155mm which is probably the best SPG on the planet. I have no doubt Ukraine appreciates these generous contributions.Since everyone including our neighbours want the F35 we should send a couple of Gripens southeast. They're pretty good at taking off and landing at improvised runways (bits of road) as I understand it (less distance needed) which may come in handy. I don't think this will ever materialize though, maybe a couple of tanks if our neighbours are sending tanks too.
Yes. Quite a lot of heavy caliber entities coming into UA now from many countries, I hope the invading forces feel their contribution this spring and summer.Sweden is sending 50 CV90s which are excellent IFVs and about 20 Archer 155mm which is probably the best SPG on the planet. I have no doubt Ukraine appreciates these generous contributions.