Russia on brink of ... NOPE! Russia INVADES Ukraine!

Page 876 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,619
409
126
More pro India propaganda I'm sure..

Just like this your facts vs actual facts

View attachment 73286

Pro India propaganda like how the U.S. condoned and supported the actions of the Pakistan army massacring millions of people in Bangladesh?

During the nine-month-long Bangladesh Liberation War, members of the Pakistan Armed Forces and supporting pro-Pakistani Islamist militias from Jamaat-e-Islami[7] killed between 300,000 and 3,000,000[1][4][8] people and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bengali women,[8][9][10] in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape.[11][12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide

Pro India propaganda on how the US sent Task Force 74 to counter Indian forces during the 1971 war?

The second Task Force 74 was assembled from the U.S. Navy′s Seventh Fleet that was deployed to the Bay of Bengal by the Nixon administration in December 1971 during the Indo-Pakistani War, which eventually culminated in the liberation of Bangladesh. The fleet was sent to intimidate Indian forces at the height of the conflict.[1][2] The Soviet Union, which was actively backing Indian actions both politically and militarily during the war responded by deploying two groups of cruisers and destroyers as well as a submarine armed with nuclear warheads in response to the American military presence in the area.[3] From 18 December 1971 to 7 January 1972, the Soviet Navy trailed the American fleet throughout the Indian Ocean.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Task_Force_74#:~:text=The%20second%20Task%20Force%2074,in%20the%20liberation%20of%20Bangladesh.
 

Young Grasshopper

Senior member
Nov 9, 2007
957
328
136
Not as funny as this shit Russkie kook sucker

View attachment 73283


Do you ever do your own research bud to verify if this stuff is actually true? Or do you just willingly believe whatever propaganda the CIA puts out? Where is the video evidence of the actual shot being fired and the jet being taken down? BTW I read the story when it came out. He was holding a shotgun not a rifle, not to mention the cost of the actual jet is around 35 million, but the reports on this story state the jet costs around $75 million. Might as well double the cost of it right? It's not like the plebs who believe it will do any kind of research or fact checking....

You must have believed the 'ghost of Kiev' was real too right? Hoax.


Or that Russian soldiers were pulling gold Ukrainian teeth in some kind of torture chamber? Hoax.


Or how about Russia, not the west, destroying the Nordstream pipeline? Hoax.


Stay propagandized my friend.
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,619
409
126

LOL, sorry you have a short memory.

Sorry, that post in no way supports Russia. It was an answer in the context of Indian diplomatic position. You are simply being disingenuous.

Again, show me one post where I supported Russia over the invasion?
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,619
409
126
Already done. Be as dishonest as you want.

Eh? You tried passing off a totally different post as one where I supported Russia hoping it won't get noticed in the flood of posts here in this thread.

And now you claim I'm the dishonest one? Thats rich and something I entirely expect from the likes of you especially after getting caught.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,478
9,380
136
India has made its position clear on the war: cessation of all hostilities of the war and resumption of dialog. You approaching this all wrong, don't resurrect the ugly 'if you are not with us, you are against us' mentality.
So if Pakistan annexed all of Kashmir you would say that India shouldn't have an armed response but that they should sit down and chat about it?!

(Interesting aside. My phone auto corrects "armed response" to "American response"!)
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,619
409
126
So if Pakistan annexed all of Kashmir you would say that India shouldn't have an armed response but that they should sit down and chat about it?!

(Interesting aside. My phone auto corrects "armed response" to "American response"!)



Unlike all your fantasies of my so called support for the Russian Invasion is my own personal position is that Ukraine has the utmost moral authority during the course of the hostilities to recover back its lost territory. Unlike the Russians invading a foreign nation, the Ukrainians are fighting for their own country.

So the war waged by Ukraine is not what constitutes an offensive act in my personal books, but is instead a necessary duty/ action on part of the Ukrainians. But all actions by Russia is considered hostile especially when inside Ukrainian territory.

India's position on the Russian Invasion is to be viewed in light of Modi's public rebuke to Putin.


In a stunning public rebuke, Modi told Putin: “Today’s era is not an era of war, and I have spoken to you on the phone about this.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/16/kherson-ukraine-russia-war-putin/
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,165
30,117
146
Gaetz and Boebert seem to believe capital security rules don't apply to them.

Next time they try to flip off security they should be tazered and cuffed. And I hope the pederast resists.

It was amusing watching the TCC (Treasonous Cvnt Caucus) pout and scowl as the 3 of them sat there during Zelenskyy's speech, refusing to join their colleagues in even the barest expression of humanity by simply standing up and clapping, at least once.

Illiteracy is bad, and as a nation we really should strive to prevent creating more idiots like this.
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,165
30,117
146
Unlike all your fantasies of my so called support for the Russian Invasion is my own personal position is that Ukraine has the utmost moral authority during the course of the hostilities to recover back its lost territory. Unlike the Russians invading a foreign nation, the Ukrainians are fighting for their own country.

So the war waged by Ukraine is not what constitutes an offensive act in my personal books, but is instead a necessary duty/ action on part of the Ukrainians. But all actions by Russia is considered hostile especially when inside Ukrainian territory.

India's position on the Russian Invasion is to be viewed in light of Modi's public rebuke to Putin.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/16/kherson-ukraine-russia-war-putin/

uh huh. lol that you think Modi is to be trusted and isn't milking the space between Vlad's legs when they are on the phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indus

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,478
9,380
136
Unlike all your fantasies of my so called support for the Russian Invasion is my own personal position is that Ukraine has the utmost moral authority during the course of the hostilities to recover back its lost territory. Unlike the Russians invading a foreign nation, the Ukrainians are fighting for their own country.

So the war waged by Ukraine is not what constitutes an offensive act in my personal books, but is instead a necessary duty/ action on part of the Ukrainians. But all actions by Russia is considered hostile especially when inside Ukrainian territory.

India's position on the Russian Invasion is to be viewed in light of Modi's public rebuke to Putin.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/16/kherson-ukraine-russia-war-putin/

Maybe you shouldn't have posted this as if you agreed with it then.
India has made its position clear on the war: cessation of all hostilities of the war and resumption of dialog. You approaching this all wrong, don't resurrect the ugly 'if you are not with us, you are against us' mentality.
 

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,619
409
126
Maybe you shouldn't have posted this as if you agreed with it then.

You didn't see Modi rebuke Zelensky over the war did you? No, you saw Modi rebuke Putin.

As for sucking off Putin? Sorry, it may float all your president's boat, but Modi has no time for nonsense.

Also note the US's own words when to comes to deciding between India and Pakistan.

"We have a global strategic partnership with India. I have also spoken about the deep partnership we have with Pakistan. These relationships in our mind are not zero-sum. We do not view them in relation to one another,"

https://zeenews.india.com/world/we-...ilawal-bhuttos-remark-on-pm-modi-2551053.html

The US has maintained strategic relationships with one of India's worst enemies since independence and Indian's have learnt to live with it for over fifty years. It shouldn't hurt you a few more years of strategic ambivalence by India when it comes to balancing the interests between Washington and Moscow
 
Last edited:

Braznor

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2005
4,619
409
126
Diplomacy with mafia states? By definition any just system moves to put criminals in jail.


Do you think American actions over the years has been gleaming with virtue over the years? All states are mafia states in that sense. But you both share a planet and you will have to learn to live with each other especially since you both have nukes.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,710
51,001
136
You didn't see Modi rebuke Zelensky over the war did you? No, you saw Modi rebuke Putin.

As for sucking off Putin? Sorry, it may float all your president's boat, but Modi has no time for nonsense.

Also note the US's own words when to comes to deciding between India and Pakistan.



https://zeenews.india.com/world/we-...ilawal-bhuttos-remark-on-pm-modi-2551053.html

The US has maintained strategic relationships with one of India's worst enemies since independence and Indian's have learnt to live with it for over fifty years. It shouldn't hurt you a few more years of strategic ambivalence by India when it comes to balancing the interests between Washington and Moscow
India learned to live with it first by aligning with the Soviet Union and then only really accepting it after US victory in the Cold War made it so they had no choice.

Both militarily and economically India needs the US more than the US needs India and it’s probably valuable for India to keep that in mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54