So Ukraine has no right to self determination and no right to defend itself because the west is bad? Ukraine is asking the west for help, not Russia. Do you suppose there is a legitimate reason for that?
Edit : Look at the first post on this page which sums up Russian negotiating tactics in all their glory.
No. Rather, Ukraine was manipulated by the West in 2004 onward through the color revolution and NATO enlargement. The goal of the latter is not to give Ukraine the right to self determination but to use that as a pretext for containing Russia. That's why the U.S. has over 700 military bases and installations worldwide, and according to one of its former Presidents, the most warlike in modern history:
The only US president to complete his term without war, military attack or occupation has called the United States “the most warlike nation in the history
www.counterpunch.org
Around 400 of those are even used to encircle China:
Recall that when the Soviet Union fell apart, the West guaranteed that NATO would not advance one inch forward:
Here is how the history of NATO, Russia and Ukraine got so complicated.
www.npr.org
But the U.S. reversed that during the late 1990s, as part of aggressive policies towards other countries, prompted by Reagan's "evil empire" speech. Kennan, who actually formulated containment policies against the Soviet Union, correctly predicted that by doing so it the West would meet the ire of nationalist countries like Russia and even China:
George F Kennan Op-Ed article contends that expanding NATO would be 'most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-cold-war era;' maintains that such decision would inflame nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion and have adverse effect on...
www.nytimes.com
And that's precisely what happened.
One question that wasn't answered: if NATO was meant to counter the Soviet Union, and given the fact that Russia wanted to even join NATO, then why did the U.S. insist on not only NATO enlargement but even a pivot to the Middle East through Bush, and later a pivot to Asia through Obama? Why was the U.S. and its chamchas so keen on containing not just Russia and China but even other members of BRICS and emerging markets? Might it have to do with the idea of a grand chessboard strategy
Alienating Ukraine from Russia while ignoring its security concerns has been a lasting goal for the US hegemony. How did Zbigniew Brzezinski's theories affect the decision-making process and strategic planning of consecutive US administrations?
english.almayadeen.net
and the need to use a combination of neoconservatism (backed by American exceptionalism) and neoliberalism to make sure that other countries remain in the orbit of U.S. influence or are contained?