K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 48,246
- 37,668
- 136
What? More weapons for Ukraine? Sure, no problem.
but the point that counts is their content is generally valid and imho, fairly reliable.
You should not play Russian Roulette with semi automatics. Get better soon.I realize they have a bias (might be hard if not to, if one actually was aware of the reality), but the point that counts is their content is generally valid and imho, fairly reliable. That's something you'd have to see for yourself.
It wouldn't surprise me that some of their field and front line footage is forwarded to them via FSB services.
Yes, to serve OUR country. Not Ukraine's country. The US entering Ukraine to fight Russia will initiate a global thermonuclear war. Nobody wins that.You are exactly right, fortunately we have people already trained and available, people that have already willingly joined our military to serve our country.
If you'll notice he ignores any substantive criticism of his points and has entirely adopted the language of Russian propaganda. He calls Ukraine's democratically elected government the 'regime', he links directly to Russian propaganda sites, etc. Whatever the reason he's not interested in debate, he's just trying to keep pumping out Russian lies.How can you say that after countless posts here point out the discrepancies in what you have posted. Each time you say, “Oh well, it what I know is true.” It seems you have your entrenched point of view and you are reluctant to change.
Maybe you could start a thread with all your “facts” and stay out this one so we can continue to not be sidetracked by trying to help you see the truth.
I have tried not to put you on ignore, but it seems the best way to deal with you is exactly that. I funny thing about opinions, as you state this repeatedly, is that given data they change. I would not count your posts as opinion because they have be consistently repudiated and you are still dug in.
So by your logic only those gung ho types should go over and fight.
No it wont. I dont believe that for a second. (quarter second maybe...)Yes, to serve OUR country. Not Ukraine's country. The US entering Ukraine to fight Russia will initiate a global thermonuclear war. Nobody wins that.
Ukraine is probably going to wreck Russia's shit over the next week, no need for us to be involved there.
Yes, to serve OUR country. Not Ukraine's country. The US entering Ukraine to fight Russia will initiate a global thermonuclear war. Nobody wins that.
Ukraine is probably going to wreck Russia's shit over the next week, no need for us to be involved there.
Really? The old irrational egotist dictator who thinks he cannot possibly lose won't deploy a nuclear weapon on his enemies? What makes you so confident of that?No it wont. I dont believe that for a second. (quarter second maybe...)
Frankly, no one knows even close to an exact figure - not even the Russians. Too many fronts, too much indirect fire, and too many liars up and down the chain on both sides.Did Vlad lose 3,000 troops yesterday?
![]()
Russian losses in the War against Ukraine: Day 21th | Defense Express
Russians are facing non-stop military losses on Ukrainian soilen.defence-ua.com
Numbers I saw yesterday said much lower.
I realize they have a bias (might be hard if not to, if one actually was aware of the reality), but the point that counts is their content is generally valid and imho, fairly reliable. That's something you'd have to see for yourself.
mediabiasfactcheck.com

It's nice to see people stepping up, but I can't help but remember that they often closed the door to other refugees fleeing conflict.
Poland realy stepping up and helping Ukrainians, that's a massive influx of people
Many countries in Europe has a worker shortage and Ukrainians is plug-n-play into the system, so I am guessing many countries is actually betting on a sizeable fraction of them is gonna stay.
Poland realy stepping up and helping Ukrainians, that's a massive influx of people
Europeans are more willing to help other Europeans. Poland was pretty ruthless in shutting out refugees from various conflicts in Asia.It's nice to see people stepping up, but I can't help but remember that they often closed the door to other refugees fleeing conflict.
While I don't think Vladimir would go straight to global thermonuclear war, the Russians don't see nearly as sharp a divide between conventional and tactical nukes.No it wont. I dont believe that for a second. (quarter second maybe...)
This statement might as well been issued from Tucker CarlsonHahaha fuck off Putin. Your embarrassing existence only gets more hilarious every day.
Still time for his evening show.This statement might as well been issued from Tucker Carlson
Sure. But all things considered… he should do that right now, specially right now with the way its going in Ukraine.While I don't think Vladimir would go straight to global thermonuclear war, the Russians don't see nearly as sharp a divide between conventional and tactical nukes.
If NATO entered the war, there is real risk that Russia would see that as enough of an existential threat to quickly escalate to 5kt-10kt tactical nukes on US and NATO military bases in Europe - with objective of destroying majority of aviation and ground armor (all nicely stockpiled at military bases) with just a double handful of strikes, causing limited broader impacts, and demand the now largely declawed NATO in Europe to stand-down or face that strategic nuke threat.
While the West would have a very different view of the "limited" broader impacts from that tactical nukes usage.
