ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,766
- 18,045
- 146
Great double-think on display here!
Yea, sure. You sure nailed it, lulz.
Great double-think on display here!
Why don't you explain how you think Rush is gas-lighting in this case when the next moment you turn around and say "Sure, those [bigoted] demographics are technically a minority of the population, but thanks for gerrymandering and the EC, that minority gets to set policy for everyone."
If it wasn't for that last sentence I may have given you the benefit of the doubt and thought "Well, he could add some qualifiers, some of which may be genuine," but you really destroyed yourself here. You're simultaneously holding two contradictory positions in a very obvious way.
There would need to be a rational argument to address, as opposed to an ocean of snark with no substance. I could respond with my own snark, but that's not me. That said, you saying that Rush is gas lighting you and then turning around and agreeing with him a few sentences later was too good to pass up on.
I'm not a Rush Limbaugh fan, but after reading the article I have no idea what you guys are making a fuss over. The quotes in the story aren't a condemnation of Buttigieg's sexuality, they're a claim that if Buttigieg shows PDAs with his husband in the general that it will hurt his electability. Which certainly may be the case given the predilections of some minority demographics that usually lean Democrat.
But even if there were something there, that hardly excuses you guys from celebrating a cancer diagnosis.
When asked if he considered himself a combat veteran, he replied, “Some say you are a combat veteran if you have a Combat Action Ribbon (I do not). Others say deploying to a combat zone makes you one. I simply consider myself a veteran, and I’ll leave it to others to decide what else to call it.”,-- which he is!!It doesn’t take anything away from the argument, but he’s not a combat veteran.
well, it's rush limbaugh soI'm not a Rush Limbaugh fan, but after reading the article I have no idea what you guys are making a fuss over. The quotes in the story aren't a condemnation of Buttigieg's sexuality, they're a claim that if Buttigieg shows PDAs with his husband in the general that it will hurt his electability. Which certainly may be the case given the predilections of some minority demographics that usually lean Democrat.
But even if there were something there, that hardly excuses you guys from celebrating a cancer diagnosis.
He is a lesser evil than Trump.About 0.1% as many as to dislike Trump.