• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rupert Murdoch Confesses To Propaganda On Iraq

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
How "fair and balanced" is Faux Noise and the rest of Rupert Murdoch's evil media empire? Last Friday, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Rupert Murdoch blatantly admitted he had tried to use his media outlets to pimp the Bushwhackos' illegal war in Iraq.

To see Keith Olbermann's coverage of the story, click the video link, "Rupert Murdoch's revelation" on the upper right of the page. That may change within a few days. The transcript won't be online until tomorrow (2-8-07). Note -- It only works in IE for me.

The original story:
Murdoch Confesses To Propaganda On Iraq

News Corpse | February 5, 2007

Last Friday, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Rupert Murdoch sat on a panel where he lamented what he described as a ?loss of power? due to the ascension of the Internet and other new media. The notion that this captain of one of the most dominant media conglomerates in the world is trembling in the shadow of bloggers is simply absurd. Especially when you consider the fact that his company is also a dominant player on the Internet with an aggressive acquisitiveness that includes MySpace, the world?s largest online social networking site.

But there was a more shocking exchange that took place that ought to have caused more of a stir amongst professional journalists and all freedom loving people. It was an exchange that revealed something that most conscious beings knew, but which I have never seen explicitly articulated.

Murdoch was asked if News Corp. had managed to shape the agenda on the war in Iraq. His answer?

?No, I don?t think so. We tried.?
Asked by Rose for further comment, he said: ?We basically supported the Bush policy in the Middle East?but we have been very critical of his execution.?

Let me repeat this: ?We Tried!?

Setting aside the nonsense that they had ever been critical of Bush?s adventures in Baghdad, having confessed to being deliberatly deceitful raises some questions. For instance, how can anyone ever again take seriously Fox News or any of Murdoch?s other instruments of bias? How can News Corp. continue to pretend that they are ?fair and balanced?? How can any other media company exhibit the slightest expression of respect or patronization?

And speaking of other media companies, where are they now? The Chairman and CEO of a media empire that includes the number one rated cable news network, and numerous newspapers around the world, has just admitted that he tried to use that empire to ?shape the agenda? in support of a partisan political goal with consequences of life, death, and global destabilization. Why has the media, who you might think would have some interest in this subject, virtually ignored these remarks? We know they were there because, on the very same day, there was a media tempest over remarks by John Kerry on whether Bush had turned the U. S. into an international pariah. That trumped up commotion was led, of course, by Fox News. Even the Hollywood Reporter downplayed the most startling portion of Murdoch?s presentation by headlining their story: ?Big media has less sway on Internet.? They apparently felt that that was a more weighty revelation than the attempted thought-control exposed by Murdoch.

Where is the outrage? Where are the calls to disband this mammoth and unlawful propaganda machine? Murdoch, who was made an American citizen by an act of Congress because, otherwise, he could not own an American television network, should have his citizenship revoked and be deported back to Australia. Think of the precedent this sets for any other wealthy and ambitious ideologue that seeks to manipulate public opinion. There are plenty of wealthy and ambitious ideologues in the Middle East and elsewhere who may view Murdoch as a role model.

At the very least, it needs to be broadcast far and wide that News Corp. and Fox News are nothing but a tool of the neo-con operatives in government. You might say we already knew that, but this is different. We are not merely accusing them of this stance, they have now admitted it. And it can not be tolerated! Not by any standard of journalistic ethics. Not by a nation that values a free press so much that it incorporated that freedom into its Constitution.
"Fair and balanced" may be a Faux advertising slogan, but I think it's fair to say that Murdoch and his band of liars are anything but "fair," and considering the disasterous results of the Bushswhackos' war, there are probably a number of clinical psychiatrists who would question whether the word, "balanced" would apply to Murdoch, either. :roll:
 
There is no accountability in the news media, nor has there been for some time. In any other country the outrages done to us by Bush and now by Rupert would have people up in arms in the street, but apparently not the sheeple of America.


Can't wait to hear the spin that's gonna be put on this one...
 
Originally posted by: techs
Rupert Murdoch is a dangerous man. He should be deported.

No he shouldn't. Our laws say that money is speech and that if you have enough of it you can take over the entire media and be the only voice that gets heard.
 
Originally posted by: Arcex
There is no accountability in the news media, nor has there been for some time. In any other country the outrages done to us by Bush and now by Rupert would have people up in arms in the street, but apparently not the sheeple of America.


Can't wait to hear the spin that's gonna be put on this one...

Um you sir are deranged. In any other country you would have your arms and legs chopped off for even disagreeing with the government. It is only a few select countries including the USA which do not do that.
 
Originally posted by: FrancesBeansRevenge
Originally posted by: Vich
In any other country you would have your arms and legs chopped off for even disagreeing with the government.

ROFL. This is such a typically American statement.

In his defence: he did acknowledge that the US wasn't the only country where it's true.
 
Originally posted by: Harvey
How "fair and balanced" is Faux Noise and the rest of Rupert Murdoch's evil media empire?

Last Friday, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Rupert Murdoch blatantly admitted he had tried to use his media outlets to pimp the Bushwhackos' illegal war in Iraq.

He just didn't "try", he was successful along with the Republicans in here that continue to pimp the false war for their hero.
 
Originally posted by: Vich
Originally posted by: Arcex
There is no accountability in the news media, nor has there been for some time. In any other country the outrages done to us by Bush and now by Rupert would have people up in arms in the street, but apparently not the sheeple of America.


Can't wait to hear the spin that's gonna be put on this one...

Um you sir are deranged. In any other country you would have your arms and legs chopped off for even disagreeing with the government. It is only a few select countries including the USA which do not do that.

The governments of France, Germany, Canada, Britain, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Australia, Austria, Poland, Greece, Spain, Israel, Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Brazil, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Finland, India, New Zealand, and may others are a few?
 
Originally posted by: Vich
Originally posted by: Arcex
There is no accountability in the news media, nor has there been for some time. In any other country the outrages done to us by Bush and now by Rupert would have people up in arms in the street, but apparently not the sheeple of America.


Can't wait to hear the spin that's gonna be put on this one...

Um you sir are deranged. In any other country you would have your arms and legs chopped off for even disagreeing with the government. It is only a few select countries including the USA which do not do that.

Really? Are you actually trying to tell me that in any country where the president outright lied, instigated a war for personal reasons, engaged in actions that according to the Constitution are TREASONOUS (leaking sensitive data to a news agency), engaged in numerous other violations of the Constitution (disappearing, torturing, holding without due process), engaged numerous violations of UN treaties and regulations (invading a foreign power without cause, torture, disappearing people), and violated at least one states laws (when he stopped a medical procedure with a clear abuse of power), you are actually telling me there is no country on this planet where actions like that would cause at the very least riots?

Are you really saying that?
 
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Newcorpse and Keith Olbermann? Nothing like a "fair and balanced" look at this story.
You're welcome to question the source, but it doesn't mean squat if the facts are as reported. :roll:

The quote was Murdoch's own response to Charlie Rose's question. If you can't challenge that, you've got nothing to say.
 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: techs
Rupert Murdoch is a dangerous man. He should be deported.

If only the 1st amendment did not protect him, pesky Bill of Rights.

This stupid country!

Seriously, this is how freedom of speech works, it doesn't just protect speech you personally approve of. This simple fact seems to escape a rather large number of people on both sides of the aisle.
 
I don't think its wrong. Murdoch is free to publish/broadcast whatever he wants. I do remember in recent weeks however people coming and trying to say that Fox was not biased... that they had never seen any bias at Fox.

Well... there you have it.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: techs
Rupert Murdoch is a dangerous man. He should be deported.

If only the 1st amendment did not protect him, pesky Bill of Rights.

This stupid country!

Seriously, this is how freedom of speech works, it doesn't just protect speech you personally approve of. This simple fact seems to escape a rather large number of people on both sides of the aisle.

I don't have a problem with what he says and how he presents it... it's the fact that Fox pushes themselves as 'Fair and Balance'.
 
Originally posted by: ScottyB
Originally posted by: Vich
Originally posted by: Arcex
There is no accountability in the news media, nor has there been for some time. In any other country the outrages done to us by Bush and now by Rupert would have people up in arms in the street, but apparently not the sheeple of America.


Can't wait to hear the spin that's gonna be put on this one...

Um you sir are deranged. In any other country you would have your arms and legs chopped off for even disagreeing with the government. It is only a few select countries including the USA which do not do that.

The governments of France, Germany, Canada, Britain, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Australia, Austria, Poland, Greece, Spain, Israel, Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Brazil, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Finland, India, New Zealand, and may others are a few?

You have 219 countries left.
 
Originally posted by: Arcex
Originally posted by: Vich
Originally posted by: Arcex
There is no accountability in the news media, nor has there been for some time. In any other country the outrages done to us by Bush and now by Rupert would have people up in arms in the street, but apparently not the sheeple of America.


Can't wait to hear the spin that's gonna be put on this one...

Um you sir are deranged. In any other country you would have your arms and legs chopped off for even disagreeing with the government. It is only a few select countries including the USA which do not do that.

Really? Are you actually trying to tell me that in any country where the president outright lied, instigated a war for personal reasons, engaged in actions that according to the Constitution are TREASONOUS (leaking sensitive data to a news agency), engaged in numerous other violations of the Constitution (disappearing, torturing, holding without due process), engaged numerous violations of UN treaties and regulations (invading a foreign power without cause, torture, disappearing people), and violated at least one states laws (when he stopped a medical procedure with a clear abuse of power), you are actually telling me there is no country on this planet where actions like that would cause at the very least riots?

Are you really saying that?
Stop listening to michael moore.
 
Back
Top