Running Windows 2003 server as a desktop OS.

Runes911

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2000
1,683
0
76
Ok I recently bought a copy of Win 2k3 server. I wanted to know can it be run as a desktop OS? I remember seeing something on the internet about being able to and having no problems doing so. Is this true?

The reason I would want to do this is because my friends have LAN parties every now and then and its really annoying having to link up a router to a 24 port switch just to have DHCP/Internet. It would be just so much simpler to be able to hook up and be a server for us.

Edit: forgot to say "server" heh
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
If you spent $800 on an operating system, more power to you. You can use 2003 as a desktop operating system, but many people don't recommend it as there's little or nothing to gain except for the expensive price tag.

Still, your reasoning for wanting a server OS baffles me. Why would having a server operating system eliminate the need for a switch? You still need some way to physically wire the computers together. IMO a router + switch solution is the simplest way to get a group of computers online. Having a server perform DHCP/Internet sharing tasks would only make things more difficult. Perhaps I'm missing something ...
 

NokiaDude

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2002
3,966
0
0
Yes, there is a guide to make it look like XP. I wouldn't game on a server. It's better to leave it alone and run it as a dedicated server.
 

Runes911

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2000
1,683
0
76
Originally posted by: MrChad
Still, your reasoning for wanting a server OS baffles me. Why would having a server operating system eliminate the need for a switch? You still need some way to physically wire the computers together. IMO a router + switch solution is the simplest way to get a group of computers online. Having a server perform DHCP/Internet sharing tasks would only make things more difficult. Perhaps I'm missing something ...

Well we usually have >8 people playing and having to unplug my router to darg it all the way to the garage just to have a DHCP server is a big hassle. Plus there have been times when I didnt have a router on hand at a LAN party and it was SOO much of a pain to manally assign IPs to all the computers.


Originally posted by: NokiaDude
Yes, there is a guide to make it look like XP. I wouldn't game on a server. It's better to leave it alone and run it as a dedicated server.


Why not? Whats your reasoning?
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
Originally posted by: Runes911
Originally posted by: MrChad
Still, your reasoning for wanting a server OS baffles me. Why would having a server operating system eliminate the need for a switch? You still need some way to physically wire the computers together. IMO a router + switch solution is the simplest way to get a group of computers online. Having a server perform DHCP/Internet sharing tasks would only make things more difficult. Perhaps I'm missing something ...

Well we usually have >8 people playing and having to unplug my router to darg it all the way to the garage just to have a DHCP server is a big hassle. Plus there have been times when I didnt have a router on hand at a LAN party and it was SOO much of a pain to manally assign IPs to all the computers.

Why not buy a second router for $20-30?
 

Runes911

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2000
1,683
0
76
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Runes911
Originally posted by: MrChad
Still, your reasoning for wanting a server OS baffles me. Why would having a server operating system eliminate the need for a switch? You still need some way to physically wire the computers together. IMO a router + switch solution is the simplest way to get a group of computers online. Having a server perform DHCP/Internet sharing tasks would only make things more difficult. Perhaps I'm missing something ...

Well we usually have >8 people playing and having to unplug my router to darg it all the way to the garage just to have a DHCP server is a big hassle. Plus there have been times when I didnt have a router on hand at a LAN party and it was SOO much of a pain to manally assign IPs to all the computers.

Why not buy a second router for $20-30?

Bolded...

It would just be easier. So can Win 2003 server function fine as a game OS? Will I have any issues?

 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
602
126
Originally posted by: Runes911
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Runes911
Originally posted by: MrChad
Still, your reasoning for wanting a server OS baffles me. Why would having a server operating system eliminate the need for a switch? You still need some way to physically wire the computers together. IMO a router + switch solution is the simplest way to get a group of computers online. Having a server perform DHCP/Internet sharing tasks would only make things more difficult. Perhaps I'm missing something ...

Well we usually have >8 people playing and having to unplug my router to darg it all the way to the garage just to have a DHCP server is a big hassle. Plus there have been times when I didnt have a router on hand at a LAN party and it was SOO much of a pain to manally assign IPs to all the computers.

Why not buy a second router for $20-30?

Bolded...

It would just be easier. So can Win 2003 server function fine as a game OS? Will I have any issues?

If you want to spend $800 instead of trying to remember to bring a $25 router with you to your lan parties, more power to you. There isn't any reason 2k3 wouldn't work, its solid. Many freeware antivirus won't install on 2k3 however.
 

Runes911

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2000
1,683
0
76
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Runes911
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Runes911
Originally posted by: MrChad
Still, your reasoning for wanting a server OS baffles me. Why would having a server operating system eliminate the need for a switch? You still need some way to physically wire the computers together. IMO a router + switch solution is the simplest way to get a group of computers online. Having a server perform DHCP/Internet sharing tasks would only make things more difficult. Perhaps I'm missing something ...

Well we usually have >8 people playing and having to unplug my router to darg it all the way to the garage just to have a DHCP server is a big hassle. Plus there have been times when I didnt have a router on hand at a LAN party and it was SOO much of a pain to manally assign IPs to all the computers.

Why not buy a second router for $20-30?

Bolded...

It would just be easier. So can Win 2003 server function fine as a game OS? Will I have any issues?

If you want to spend $800 instead of trying to remember to bring a $25 router with you to your lan parties, more power to you. There isn't any reason 2k3 wouldn't work, its solid. Many freeware antivirus won't install on 2k3 however.


Actually I only spent about $250 but this was the answer I was looking for thanks!
 

igowerf

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2000
7,697
1
76
I tried running Windows 2003 as a desktop OS and it was a HUGE pain in the ass.

After a few days, it started shutting itself down because of some network domain policy.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555087

Aside from that, a couple games wouldn't install because the wrong OS was detected, I had some really weird problems getting ffdshow to stay properly configured, I HAD to use a server antivirus, and there were lots of other little things that just didn't work well for a desktop OS.
 

RJR2006

Member
Jul 17, 2005
44
0
0
it is impossible to use Win2003 as a desktop OS, and it is designed to work and act as a server.