• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

running memory in-sync with FSB??

jjyiz28

Platinum Member
i think a remember a while back ago that optimal memory frequency is when it runs insync with the FSB of the motherboard/cpu.

is this correct, and does this still apply? using my q6600 running at 266x9(2.4ghz) overclocked to 333x9(3.0GHz), is it better running my memory at 1300mhz(hypothetically) , or leaving it at 800mhz
 
Doesn't matter one little bit. 10+ years ago, with P4 or Athlon XPs, sure. Even though Core 2s have an FSB, running your RAM faster makes no difference, though can occasionally increase performance slightly, especially if the timings are similar between the FSB speed and rated speed (IE, CAS 5 at 800MHz is faster than CAS 5 at 677MHz is faster than CAS 5 at 533MHz).
 
i think a remember a while back ago that optimal memory frequency is when it runs insync with the FSB of the motherboard/cpu.

is this correct, and does this still apply? using my q6600 running at 266x9(2.4ghz) overclocked to 333x9(3.0GHz), is it better running my memory at 1300mhz(hypothetically) , or leaving it at 800mhz

There's no benefit to running it faster than 667 in your case.
 
Back
Top