Running barefoot the way to go?

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
I will remain a shod runner. Running barefoot does not sound fun to me at all.

KT
 

MiniDoom

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2004
5,305
0
76
I see a guy on the MUP by my house all the time running barefoot. haven't tried it myself.
 

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
It's too bad we don't have a forum for fitness related activities that keep you healthy.
 

JoeKing

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,641
1
81
It's too bad we don't have a forum for fitness related activities that keep you healthy.

WUUAHHH?! Back in my day there were just 10 forums, and you were lucky to have them!


but mods feel free to move if you see "fit" <-----YES, my pun a day is complete!
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
I see the high school soccer team practicing barefoot at the high school close to my house.
They have a nice astroturf field though.

I read an article about this a few years ago.
They said that if you go straight out and run barefoot on your front pad, you can damage your calf muscles because they have not been trained to rin taht way your entire life.

I think it would be good to run every now and then like that.
It probably helps strengthen rarely used portions of your legs.
 

dougp

Diamond Member
May 3, 2002
7,909
4
0
lol! that just looks so wrong... like those socks with the spaces for your toes

They're odd at first, and your pinky toe has NO WHERE near the correct amount of strength to wear them for more than an hour at a time. I want to get the "casual" style to wear around since mine are the running pair that are grey and lime green.
 

SlitheryDee

Lifer
Feb 2, 2005
17,252
19
81
I already strike the ground with my forefoot when running shod. I walk like that too. I have been lead to believe that this is a bad habit my entire life and have tried unsuccessfully to break it. People say that I "tip-toe" everywhere.

It would be pretty funny (and fortuitous) if it is discovered that my way has been better all along.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,675
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Yes and no. If you're running on "soft" ground (dirt/grass, sand, soil, etc) - the human anatomy is designed to be barefoot. If you're running on man made "hard" surfaces such as concrete or asphalt, then you do more harm because the ground doesn't give causing far more stress on your joints and ligaments.
 

InflatableBuddha

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2007
7,416
1
0
The debate about running shod vs. barefoot rages on.

However, midfoot-forefoot striking is more effective and less liable to cause injuries. When you shorten your stride and increase your cadence (turnover), your feet tend to land closer in line with your body rather than way out in front as they would with an extreme heel strike. As your footstrike becomes closer in line with your body, it is more natural to midfoot-forefoot strike and toe-off.

The main benefits of midfoot-forefoot striking are increased propulsion and efficiency (you don't lose as much kinetic energy as you do when you heel strike and rock forward), and less risk of injury, since impacts are less forceful.

I have personally modified my running style to become more of a mid-foot striker, with increased toe-off. Though I have reduced heel-striking, I haven't eliminated it completely (I can tell by looking at wear patterns on my old shoes).

That said, (minimal) shoes are the best way to go. There are many surfaces (gravel, asphalt, etc.) which are simply too harsh/sharp/hard to run barefoot on, though I agree that running barefoot on softer surfaces can be ok.

The most elite runners in the world still wear running shoes, and many of them still have a slight heel-strike. The day I see barefoot runners winning major marathons in close to 2 hours is the day I'll change over.

Check out the photo on this book cover - at least 4 of the runners are heel-striking to some degree:
bigimage.1242932095.jpeg
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,222
10,670
126
Being barefoot is generally better all around imo. If your body did better with shoes, you'd have been born with them. For protection, I'd wear something like a climbers shoe. Just a skin to protect against cuts and abrasion on modern surfaces.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
There was a study done years ago with people who have to stand all day. The ones without shoes said it was better than wearing shoes and less fatigue in the legs and joints.
Of course going to work without shoes has other problems.


There are also a lot of people wearing the wrong shoes. Most people just buy shoes based on looks and assume they are supposed to feel that way. Just because it is a size 10 and fits does not meant it is the right shoe. I saw that one of the shoe or insert companies now has a pressure pad for people to stand on in store to see how their foot is different from others. Haven't tried one myself but that could help many people.

Before they knew x-rays were harmful they had machines people put their feet into then the people could look through the viewer to see the bones move and the fit of the shoe. They even had machines for multiple viewers so moms and kids could view together.


Found the foot mapping site:
http://www.footmapping.com/
 
Last edited:

surfsatwerk

Lifer
Mar 6, 2008
10,110
5
81
I've been wearing those Vibram Five Fingers for several months now. As a big man, 6'1" 305lbs, the barefoot style of running has made an enormous difference. My ankles and knees used to kill me after a run. Planting on my forefoot I can really feel the weight in my thighs and shins and off my joints.

I'm no marathoner, but the change has allowed me to run a lot more than I used to.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
No surprise here.

But yeah, i don't see how i can benefit from this as there's no way in hell i'm stepping outside w/o shoes.

Way too many ways for me to puncture my feet in a hurry w/o 'em :eek:
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,034
127
106
I have a pair of NIKE Free shoes. They aren't as crazy as Vibram Five Fingers but are really comfortable. I don't run though.
 

HydroSqueegee

Golden Member
Oct 27, 2005
1,709
2
71
did no one ever 'run on their toes' as a kid? thats how ive always run. anytime i land heel first my entire body jidders and vision goes all wonkey
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Nike's Free line of shoes gives the feeling of barefoot running with some foot protection.

I tried barefoot running last year but kept stubbing my toes.
 

ModerateRepZero

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2006
1,572
5
81
it's best to run barefoot on soft surfaces, like sandy beaches or grass, although obviously you do have to worry about stepping on nails or any other sharp/spiky things that can be on the ground.

all in all though, nothing's wrong with running with shoes as long as they're comfortable and provide adequate cushioning for your feet.