Run Windows Vista for a year without being activated

NoobyDoo

Senior member
Nov 13, 2006
463
0
71
Link

The same one-line command that postpones Vista's activation deadline to 120 days can be used an indefinite number of times by first changing a Registry key from 0 to 1.

This isn't a hacker exploit. It doesn't require any tools or utilities whatsoever. Microsoft even documented the Registry key, although obtusely, on its Technet site.
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
2 thoughts:
1) Can you use Windows Update with it? I'd consider it moderately useless without the ability to install security updates.
2) How long until MS changes this behavior through a patch?
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: ViRGE
2 thoughts:
1) Can you use Windows Update with it? I'd consider it moderately useless without the ability to install security updates.
2) How long until MS changes this behavior through a patch?
I've used the postponement command and Windows Update functions perfectly.
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: nerp
Why not activate?
For me, it's because I may or may not move this copy of Vista to my laptop and get a copy of Home Premium for the desktop to have Media Center for my Xbox 360. I just don't want to deal with the hassle of calling Microsoft and explaining why I'm moving licenses around.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
This is all quite true, and Microsoft has done it deliberately to facilitate deployment in quantity environments. This is designed to give the IT managers time to deploy Vista to possibly hundreds of systems, and it will not be changed.
 

Noema

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2005
2,974
0
0
According to the article it's not only legal; it complies with the EULA and Microsoft themselves have documented it.

The article also raises an interesting point:

"...dishonest PC sellers could use the procedure to install thousands of copies of Vista and sell them to unsuspecting consumers or businesses as legitimately activated copies. This would certainly violate the Vista EULA, but consumers might not realize this until the PCs they bought started demanding activation ? and failing ? months or years later."