I don't understand why so many people think we're going to go after Saddam, when we could have gone after him before.. We didn't before, and I doubt we do now, mainly because he's so predictable, and he's not a viable threat to the Mideast, or to our security. We throw a few bombs down on him every once in a while to keep him in check, but that's about it.. Its better to have him in there, than someone else who is unpredictable, and/or a major threat.. That only makes sense..
Sure, we might drop a few extra bombs on him, just to give him a little extra warning, but he really isn't that much of a threat... We've got him where we want him, why not leave him?
Sure, we might drop a few extra bombs on him, just to give him a little extra warning, but he really isn't that much of a threat... We've got him where we want him, why not leave him?
