• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ruling: Pregnant Woman not equal to Two people in HOV lane

Judge: Don't Count Fetus for Carpool Quota
Jan 11 2:36 PM US/Eastern

MESA, Ariz.

Unborn children don't count when it comes to carpool lanes, according to a judge's ruling.

Even after being fined $367 for improper use of a High Occupancy Vehicle lane, Ahwatukee Foothills resident Candace Dickinson stood by her contention that Arizona traffic laws don't define what a person is, so the child inside her womb justified her use of the lane.

"To follow her philosophy would require officers to carry guns, radios and pregnancy testers, and I don't think we want to go there," said Sgt. Dave Norton, the Phoenix police officer who cited Dickinson on Nov. 8.

Sole occupant vehicles aren't allowed to use the carpool lanes during morning and evening rush hours Monday through Friday.

The idea is to lessen traffic congestion, Norton said, citing federal guidelines for creating the lanes.

Norton said when he stopped Dickinson's car on Interstate 10, only one person was visible in the car.

When he asked Dickinson how many people were in the car, "she said two as she pointed to her obvious pregnancy," Norton said.

The case set off a firestorm of opinion but Phoenix Municipal Court Judge Dennis Freeman used a "common sense" definition in which an individual occupies a "separate and distinct" space in a vehicle.

"The law is meant to fill empty space in a vehicle," Freeman said.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/11/D8F2LSD84.html
 
The law is meant to keep people from driving seperately, using more fuel and damaging the economy, in my opinion. Not just to fill space..
 
The law is meant to keep people from driving seperately, using more fuel and damaging the economy, in my opinion. Not just to fill space..

If you believed that the addition of a carpool lane would influence behavior that way you might be correct, but that's not the case for probably 99% of the population. HOV lanes are simply a waste of resources to allow a feel-good moment for folks who qualify for the lane by sheer accident in most cases (your co-worker just happens to live three houses down the street). It's wasting perfectly good travel lanes to give an insufferable minority the ability to crow about how noble they are for "saving the planet."
 
The fetus doesn't have a birth certificate or social security number yet. There are several good reasons for this.

Some of these reasons apply to why you can't use the HOV lane when you're pregnant.
 
My wife mentioned (when it first made news) she heard someone else say if she had won, then they could give tickets to pregnant women for driving with a child in the front seat, etc.


 
Back
Top