Rudi Johnson benched...better adjust your FFL teams

[FreshPrince]

 

[venk]

LINK OR BAN!!!!!!!!

 

[FreshPrince]

fanball.com

 

[ThePresence]

Text

CLEVELAND - Running back Rudi Johnson won't start the Bengals opener in Cleveland on Sunday because of the violation of an unspecified team rule.

 

[RedPickle]

RB Chris Perry will start, but Johnson could play the second snap and in the first possession. The violation is believed to be minor, such as being late for a meeting. Johnson is habitually the last player to get onto the field for practice or into meeting rooms.

 

[BrokenVisage]

Wow, thanks man, that would have sucked in one of my leagues if you didn't say something.

 

[Tylanner]

he didn't flush

 

[blurredvision]

Thanks for the heads up, but he should still see signifcant action to justify leaving him in.

 

[iamme]

ok, i'm an admitted FF n00b.

i have Rudi Johnson, so i'm guessing i should bench him?

my alternative RB is Tatum Bell. should i play him instead?

 

[Tylanner]

Originally posted by: iamme
ok, i'm an admitted FF n00b.

i have Rudi Johnson, so i'm guessing i should bench him?

my alternative RB is Tatum Bell. should i play him instead?

Keep rudi

I any goaline situation Rudi will get the call, so he'll get the TD's.

I would play rudi as if he were starting.

 

[Slick5150]

Yeah, this thread is incredibly misleading. He's just not playing the opening snap as a symbolic penalty for missing a meeting. He's still playing his usual load

 

[Tylanner]

TD Rudi

 

[blurredvision]

I feel sorry for any of you suckers that benched Rudi due to this thread. Great day for him .

GO BENGALS!! UNDEFEATED!!!