Rosie O'Donnell's Latest Bout of Stupidity

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Minerva

Platinum Member
Nov 18, 1999
2,116
13
81
There's conspiracy theories about everything.

Computer viruses, ozone layer, cell phone radiation, AIDS, gas prices, Katrina, you name it. It may even be conspired that this thread will self destruct in ten more posts.
 
Oct 28, 2006
125
0
0
Originally posted by: Minerva
There's conspiracy theories about everything.

Computer viruses, ozone layer, cell phone radiation, AIDS, gas prices, Katrina, you name it. It may even be conspired that this thread will self destruct in ten more posts.

Yep, I love it how these conspiracy nuts think we are not sophisticated enough to actually go to the moon and had to fake it, yet think we are able to orchestrate and cover up somthing as complicated as 911.

Honestly, I almost wish our government were organized and sophisticated enough to pull off somthing like 911 (not actually)... ever dealt with a government organization?? Not exactly efficent and organized.

Do a search on "HARP" or H.A.R.P. (I think thats how you spell it). Some people believe we have a machine in alaska that controls the weather and natural disasters. (And used it to cause Katrina) Once again, we have this but had to fake the moon landing??

EDIT: Actually its HARRP

The kings of the nuts however are the ones that believe in Chemtrails! Love it!

Apologies for sorta hijacking this thread...
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Originally posted by: Minerva
There's conspiracy theories about everything.

Computer viruses, ozone layer, cell phone radiation, AIDS, gas prices, Katrina, you name it. It may even be conspired that this thread will self destruct in ten more posts.

9 left.

These conspiracies make for an interestingly funny sunday morning
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: Wheezer
I hate to break this to you, but there were conspiracy theories about the original WTC bombing in '93.

Of course, especially since the FBI allowed the 1993 WTC bombing to happen:

CBS News

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html

It's hilarious how you take one unsubstantiated comment by some nobody as "proof" of a conspiracy. And you want us to believe that you're not a paranoid schizophrenic?
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: noto12ious

I would suggest you study 9/11 Hero William Rodriguez's statements, which are corroborated by numerous other witnesses. Explosions rocked the lower levels of the towers, including the basements.... some which occurred before the planes even struck the towers.

"BTW, you still haven't answered the question I asked earlier in the thread"

More like I skip your posts since you've done nothing but troll in all 9/11 threads. You've offered nothing except apologist remarks and name calling :)

Who said the bombs heard were only located from "high up" in the building? All the evidence suggests bombs were located throughout the building, including the sub levels. William Rodriguez's and other WTC workers' accounts substantiate that.

This is common knowledge and I've stated this in numerous other 9/11 threads...and I know you've seen that before. You're nothing a but an apologist troll :)

All of you apologists cried / whined when major media networks covered Charlie Sheen's remaks that 9/11 was an inside job. What good did that do? Nothing... now he's narrating Loose Change Final Cut which is going to be distributed by Mark Cuban LOL. Slap in your face if anything.

And now Rosie O. GG. 9/11 Truth continues to spread and millions more continue to wake up :)

Patriots Who Question 9/11


Edit: Demolition experts around the world are saying WTC 7 was brought down by explosives. Here's one such expert: Jowenko reaffirming what he has stated before: Demolition expert says WTC7 brought down by explosives

After reading your posts, I become more and more certain that you're a schizophrenic. It's almost a certainty. You may know it or you may not, but the "fingerprint" of a schizophrenic is definitely there. From the insane dedication to pursue a flawed belief, citing numerous flawed and unlikely "references" to support those flawed beliefs, to the complete disregard of reason and logic, it's evident that you're a few nickels short of a dollar.

The "loose change" is in your head.

 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Originally posted by: Hyperblaze
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Yeah, burn someone at the stake for questioning how weakly-explained history happened!

Are you kidding me? The 9/11 conspiracy videos have been utterly destroyed point by point. They are complete nonsense.

Why are people not allowed to question spoon-fed government-issued explanations?

Because the conspiracy theories are as ignorant of the clear-cut scientific facts as a Creationist arguing against evolution. It has nothing to do with the Bush administration.

And I suppose you believe everything Bush says?

I didn't hear what Rosie mentioned but to say Bush had absolutely nothing to do with what happened is pure BS. One way or another, he was involved.

This is why I hate politics. Always makes you dirty in one way or another.

:confused:

:roll:

That's not what I said, and I definitely don't trust the Bush admin.

Originally posted by: blackllotus
The "cover-up" that Freeh alleges is that the government covered up its incompetence in preventing 9/11, not that the government caused 9/11.
This is 100% true. Most conspiracy theories revolve around government propaganda. It's a great irony. The government would rather be seen as evil and nefarious than as incompetent. So it's not that a lone crazy gunman killed the president, it was a conspiracy. And it's not that the government knows zip-zero-nada about aliens, they've just been covering it up. Etc.
Like I said, the great irony of the CT'ers is that they're the ones swallowing the spoon-fed explanations. In the real world, we're all just human beings, mostly stupid, bumbling, clueless, and incompetent, even those at the highest levels of government. And those at those highest levels would rather not have you know that. Better to be seen as evil than bumbling.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Non-political figures, most notably those in the entertainment business, should not be taken seriously when speaking out of their element... I don't know why the public continue to care (most often put down) what they say.
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
Originally posted by: rh71
Non-political figures, most notably those in the entertainment business, should not be taken seriously when speaking out of their element... I don't know why the public continue to care (most often put down) what they say.

Look at how much the public "seems"* to care about Anna Nicole Smith's death and all the drama surrounding it. It's no wonder to me.

* Note: I say "seems" because watching the news would have you believe nothing else since it's the only story I see being covered when I switch on the boobtube, in the last month. Everyone I know, however, was sick and tired of the drivel after the first article.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: rh71
Non-political figures, most notably those in the entertainment business, should not be taken seriously when speaking out of their element... I don't know why the public continue to care (most often put down) what they say.

Look at how much the public "seems"* to care about Anna Nicole Smith's death and all the drama surrounding it. It's no wonder to me.

* Note: I say "seems" because watching the news would have you believe nothing else since it's the only story I see being covered when I switch on the boobtube, in the last month. Everyone I know, however, was sick and tired of the drivel after the first article.

The news media (and related industries) are the most profitable industries by margin on earth. Typically more than 30% up to as much as 50%. That's roughly 10 times the typical profit margins in other industries (Exxon averages about 7% right now for example, and those evil predatory mortgage lenders you've probably been reading about lately average about 2%-3% gross margins, with a federal cap at 5%).
In addition, the news media wields virtually as much power as the government. So, in short, they can pretty much do whatever they want. They are the 800 lb. gorilla.
All Rosie was doing here was stirring up publicity and keeping her name out there.
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: noto12ious

I would suggest you study 9/11 Hero William Rodriguez's statements, which are corroborated by numerous other witnesses. Explosions rocked the lower levels of the towers, including the basements.... some which occurred before the planes even struck the towers.

"BTW, you still haven't answered the question I asked earlier in the thread"

More like I skip your posts since you've done nothing but troll in all 9/11 threads. You've offered nothing except apologist remarks and name calling :)

Who said the bombs heard were only located from "high up" in the building? All the evidence suggests bombs were located throughout the building, including the sub levels. William Rodriguez's and other WTC workers' accounts substantiate that.

This is common knowledge and I've stated this in numerous other 9/11 threads...and I know you've seen that before. You're nothing a but an apologist troll :)

All of you apologists cried / whined when major media networks covered Charlie Sheen's remaks that 9/11 was an inside job. What good did that do? Nothing... now he's narrating Loose Change Final Cut which is going to be distributed by Mark Cuban LOL. Slap in your face if anything.

And now Rosie O. GG. 9/11 Truth continues to spread and millions more continue to wake up :)

Patriots Who Question 9/11


Edit: Demolition experts around the world are saying WTC 7 was brought down by explosives. Here's one such expert: Jowenko reaffirming what he has stated before: Demolition expert says WTC7 brought down by explosives

After reading your posts, I become more and more certain that you're a schizophrenic. It's almost a certainty. You may know it or you may not, but the "fingerprint" of a schizophrenic is definitely there. From the insane dedication to pursue a flawed belief, citing numerous flawed and unlikely "references" to support those flawed beliefs, to the complete disregard of reason and logic, it's evident that you're a few nickels short of a dollar.

The "loose change" is in your head.

Just as I figured... you have nothing to respond with except name calling :) Troll indeed.

William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts > you.

Edit: I'm betting 91TTZ won't have the guts to respond because his entire argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts. :laugh:
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: Wheezer
I hate to break this to you, but there were conspiracy theories about the original WTC bombing in '93.

Of course, especially since the FBI allowed the 1993 WTC bombing to happen:

CBS News

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html

It's hilarious how you take one unsubstantiated comment by some nobody as "proof" of a conspiracy. And you want us to believe that you're not a paranoid schizophrenic?

Where did I say "proof" of a conspiracy? The "nobody" is backed up by his tapes. Whether that implies a conspiracy or not is another question. GG. Keep trolling :)

You still haven't addressed William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts. How convenient of you to ignore that once your argument has been shot down :)
 

Safeway

Lifer
Jun 22, 2004
12,074
9
81
What a worthless bag of fat. Rosie is detrimental to the American society. She advocates obesity, she advocates ignorance, she advocates hate.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: crt1530
I need to go through some of the 9/11 conspiracy theory threads, the "Plane on a treadmill" threads and the .9repeating = 1 threads and take notes on all of the morons to completely ignore. When I play poker online, the software allows me to keep notes on people. It'd be really nice if FuseTalk had a similar feature.

that would be a very nifty feature

Turn your buddy list into an idiot list.

Keep a Nixon style enemies list with notes on each one and save it to Word. :D

Actually, quite a while ago, I turned my buddy list into a non-idiot list, for simplicity's sake. Trust me, it's a much shorter list than the idiot list would be. :p :)

I have entertained the idea of compiling a list of all the bigger idiots, exactly from such threads as crt mentioned, providing links, and creating a thread. But, I'm not enough of an idiot to actually post such a list - it'd get me banned! (Or, would it make me elite? Hmmm.) :p
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,081
10,883
136
i hate when people are armchair engineers.. especially incredible retards, like rosie.
i doubt many people know what "creep" is aside from a) a very weird/scary person, b) a neutral monster in warcraft3. they also dont know how materials fracture, the necessary conditions for fracture, etc. etc.... one day, when all is right in the universe, engineers will rule the world with science,logic, and fact :p
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i hate when people are armchair engineers.. especially incredible retards, like rosie.
i doubt many people know what "creep" is aside from a) a very weird/scary person, b) a neutral monster in warcraft3. they also dont know how materials fracture, the necessary conditions for fracture, etc. etc.... one day, when all is right in the universe, engineers will rule the world with science,logic, and fact :p

One can only hope.
 
Mar 15, 2003
12,668
103
106
I think the comment is idiotic and that Rosie has a tendency to whip up controversies for ratings, but fired for having an (admittedly stupid) opinion? Free speech is more important to me than corporate responsibility.
 

beaulanger

Junior Member
Mar 25, 2007
22
0
0
If Rosie wasn't so darn sexy and hot I'd have to vehemently disagree with her comments. It's just too bad she's not even remotely interested in me because of celebrity status and "preferences".
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: noto12ious


Just as I figured... you have nothing to respond with except name calling :) Troll indeed.

William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts > you.

Edit: I'm betting 91TTZ won't have the guts to respond because his entire argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts. :laugh:

I've argued with schizophrenics before... there is no winning, even if they're trying to prove that the CIA is controlling their mind with radio waves. They will find TONS of "evidence" proving their case to be right. The problem is that to a normal person, that evidence doesn't look like evidence at all, it's just a bunch of loosely related, poorly supported claims by shady people. Schizophrenics often are intelligent people and they often have plenty of motivation and desire to tell their story. The problem isn't with their intelligence, it's with their sanity. There is a short circuit somewhere in their head and things which would otherwise be common sense to some people completely escapes others.

A normal person will quickly be able to identify someone who is not right in the head. Usually it's because those nuts don't just believe in one radical conspiracy theory. Since it's their mind that is skewed and not the events that their mind witnesses, they'll tend to believe in many different conspiracy theories.

I solve problems for a living. Forming a mental profile of how something works and then figuring out where a problem lies is just basic troubleshooting, and anyone with a job that requires them to solve problems will pick up on it. For instance, if a PC consistently crashes running one particular program that other identical PCs run without a problem, the most likely cause is the program- it may be corrupt or just be configured incorrectly. On the other hand, if that one PC has problems running all programs, the most likely culprit is something far more serious, such as the OS or a hardware problem.

As it relates to people with mental problems, if a person seems otherwise normal, has a normal thought process, but has one belief that seems a little sketchy or unlikely, such as the FBI is monitoring him, I'd look for consistency and commonality and focus on what doesn't seem right. I'd tend to listen to his story and try to figure out if and why the FBI is monitoring him- maybe he's associated with shady individuals or has done something suspect. On the other hand, if a person tells me that the FBI is monitoring him, he believes the moon landing was faked, the JFK assassination was a conspiracy by Bush Sr., 9/11 was a conspiracy, the election was rigged, and alien abductions take place, I'd tend to think that the problem is with their head. Either a single point of failure (the person's mind) has failed, or various unlikely events have conspired, and the vast majority of onlookers came to the wrong conclusion.

In this case, I can say that in all likelihood you have a mental problem. You believe in various conspiracy theories and are so ardent about them that you chime in on various threads about them and even have some posted in your sig.

Wake up to the fact that you should seek help from a doctor.
 

AAman

Golden Member
May 29, 2001
1,432
0
0
When the man in charge of your nation lacks the most basic intelligence and morality, when 'shades' of the truth don't even count as lies with his stormtroopers, then people will come to believe anything, because when the enemies of freedom at home will tell any lie just to maintain power, who are you to let 'truth' stop you from fighting back on the same level?

In other words, since every word from the administration's lips is a lie followed by another lie (if caught in the first lie), and people (like the Wilsons) are punished for telling the truth...I personally will now believe any lie told about Bush and his crew...because lies are nicer than the truth (Americans sacrificed their liberty for nothing after 9-11). I work with many lawyers, nurses, doctors, etc.- many of them now believe Bush was behind 9-11 (Repubs and Dems alike)...I've given up on saying anything. How can you defend the truth about 9-11 when it just benefits Bush and his war in Iraq and is used to kill more Americans than Al-Qaeda?
 

tboo

Diamond Member
Jun 25, 2000
7,626
1
81
Originally posted by: AAman
When the man in charge of your nation lacks the most basic intelligence and morality, when 'shades' of the truth don't even count as lies with his stormtroopers, then people will come to believe anything, because when the enemies of freedom at home will tell any lie just to maintain power, who are you to let 'truth' stop you from fighting back on the same level?

In other words, since every word from the administration's lips is a lie followed by another lie (if caught in the first lie), and people (like the Wilsons) are punished for telling the truth...I personally will now believe any lie told about Bush and his crew...because lies are nicer than the truth (Americans sacrificed their liberty for nothing after 9-11). I work with many lawyers, nurses, doctors, etc.- many of them now believe Bush was behind 9-11 (Repubs and Dems alike)...I've given up on saying anything. How can you defend the truth about 9-11 when it just benefits Bush and his war in Iraq and is used to kill more Americans than Al-Qaeda?



April Fools!
 

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: crt1530
I need to go through some of the 9/11 conspiracy theory threads, the "Plane on a treadmill" threads and the .9repeating = 1 threads and take notes on all of the morons to completely ignore. When I play poker online, the software allows me to keep notes on people. It'd be really nice if FuseTalk had a similar feature.

that would be a very nifty feature

Turn your buddy list into an idiot list.

Keep a Nixon style enemies list with notes on each one and save it to Word. :D

Actually, quite a while ago, I turned my buddy list into a non-idiot list, for simplicity's sake. Trust me, it's a much shorter list than the idiot list would be. :p :)

I have entertained the idea of compiling a list of all the bigger idiots, exactly from such threads as crt mentioned, providing links, and creating a thread. But, I'm not enough of an idiot to actually post such a list - it'd get me banned! (Or, would it make me elite? Hmmm.) :p

I'd nominate you for elite. That would be one of the most useful threads on these forums.
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: noto12ious


Just as I figured... you have nothing to respond with except name calling :) Troll indeed.

William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts > you.

Edit: I'm betting 91TTZ won't have the guts to respond because his entire argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts. :laugh:

I've argued with schizophrenics before... there is no winning, even if they're trying to prove that the CIA is controlling their mind with radio waves. They will find TONS of "evidence" proving their case to be right. The problem is that to a normal person, that evidence doesn't look like evidence at all, it's just a bunch of loosely related, poorly supported claims by shady people. Schizophrenics often are intelligent people and they often have plenty of motivation and desire to tell their story. The problem isn't with their intelligence, it's with their sanity. There is a short circuit somewhere in their head and things which would otherwise be common sense to some people completely escapes others.

A normal person will quickly be able to identify someone who is not right in the head. Usually it's because those nuts don't just believe in one radical conspiracy theory. Since it's their mind that is skewed and not the events that their mind witnesses, they'll tend to believe in many different conspiracy theories.

I solve problems for a living. Forming a mental profile of how something works and then figuring out where a problem lies is just basic troubleshooting, and anyone with a job that requires them to solve problems will pick up on it. For instance, if a PC consistently crashes running one particular program that other identical PCs run without a problem, the most likely cause is the program- it may be corrupt or just be configured incorrectly. On the other hand, if that one PC has problems running all programs, the most likely culprit is something far more serious, such as the OS or a hardware problem.

As it relates to people with mental problems, if a person seems otherwise normal, has a normal thought process, but has one belief that seems a little sketchy or unlikely, such as the FBI is monitoring him, I'd look for consistency and commonality and focus on what doesn't seem right. I'd tend to listen to his story and try to figure out if and why the FBI is monitoring him- maybe he's associated with shady individuals or has done something suspect. On the other hand, if a person tells me that the FBI is monitoring him, he believes the moon landing was faked, the JFK assassination was a conspiracy by Bush Sr., 9/11 was a conspiracy, the election was rigged, and alien abductions take place, I'd tend to think that the problem is with their head. Either a single point of failure (the person's mind) has failed, or various unlikely events have conspired, and the vast majority of onlookers came to the wrong conclusion.

In this case, I can say that in all likelihood you have a mental problem. You believe in various conspiracy theories and are so ardent about them that you chime in on various threads about them and even have some posted in your sig.

Wake up to the fact that you should seek help from a doctor.

Ladies and gentlemen, observe how the troll continues to avoid any discussion about how his argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts :)

9/11 Truth > 91TTZ :)
 

SarcasticDwarf

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2001
9,574
1
76
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: noto12ious


Just as I figured... you have nothing to respond with except name calling :) Troll indeed.

William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts > you.

Edit: I'm betting 91TTZ won't have the guts to respond because his entire argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts. :laugh:

I've argued with schizophrenics before... there is no winning, even if they're trying to prove that the CIA is controlling their mind with radio waves. They will find TONS of "evidence" proving their case to be right. The problem is that to a normal person, that evidence doesn't look like evidence at all, it's just a bunch of loosely related, poorly supported claims by shady people. Schizophrenics often are intelligent people and they often have plenty of motivation and desire to tell their story. The problem isn't with their intelligence, it's with their sanity. There is a short circuit somewhere in their head and things which would otherwise be common sense to some people completely escapes others.

A normal person will quickly be able to identify someone who is not right in the head. Usually it's because those nuts don't just believe in one radical conspiracy theory. Since it's their mind that is skewed and not the events that their mind witnesses, they'll tend to believe in many different conspiracy theories.

I solve problems for a living. Forming a mental profile of how something works and then figuring out where a problem lies is just basic troubleshooting, and anyone with a job that requires them to solve problems will pick up on it. For instance, if a PC consistently crashes running one particular program that other identical PCs run without a problem, the most likely cause is the program- it may be corrupt or just be configured incorrectly. On the other hand, if that one PC has problems running all programs, the most likely culprit is something far more serious, such as the OS or a hardware problem.

As it relates to people with mental problems, if a person seems otherwise normal, has a normal thought process, but has one belief that seems a little sketchy or unlikely, such as the FBI is monitoring him, I'd look for consistency and commonality and focus on what doesn't seem right. I'd tend to listen to his story and try to figure out if and why the FBI is monitoring him- maybe he's associated with shady individuals or has done something suspect. On the other hand, if a person tells me that the FBI is monitoring him, he believes the moon landing was faked, the JFK assassination was a conspiracy by Bush Sr., 9/11 was a conspiracy, the election was rigged, and alien abductions take place, I'd tend to think that the problem is with their head. Either a single point of failure (the person's mind) has failed, or various unlikely events have conspired, and the vast majority of onlookers came to the wrong conclusion.

In this case, I can say that in all likelihood you have a mental problem. You believe in various conspiracy theories and are so ardent about them that you chime in on various threads about them and even have some posted in your sig.

Wake up to the fact that you should seek help from a doctor.

Ladies and gentlemen, observe how the troll continues to avoid any discussion about how his argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts :)

9/11 Truth > 91TTZ :)

Here's a response:

1) It is logical that the explosion would be heard first from below as the sound of the plane impacting on the steel support structure of the building travels faster through steel than it does through the air. What the heard and felt was the entire structure (anchored just below their feet) ringing like a church bell.

2) If explosives were used, how were they hidden. If you know *anything* about demolition you know that a large amount are required, even when shaped charges are used. Furthermore, wiring must be strung between each charge.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: noto12ious

Ladies and gentlemen, observe how the troll continues to avoid any discussion about how his argument was shot down by William Rodriguez's (corroborated) accounts :)

9/11 Truth > 91TTZ :)

1. If anyone is a troll it's you, since you blindly perpetuate conspiracy theories even in the face of facts. You then discount the facts and present testimony from less than reputable people.

2. Also, "(corroborated)" isn't part of William Rodriquez's name. You don't need to type William Rodriguez (corroborated) each time.

3. Adding a smiley face at the end of every sentence does nothing to improve one's image of you. We already know that you're a loon, there's no need to punctuate your sentences with lunacy.

In addition, the guy was like Kato Kaelin, he's a no-talent aspiring showbiz lamer who craves the spotlight. The guy thrusts himself into the spotlight whenever possible. He wasn't a structural engineer or a WTC expert, he was a janitor. If I was looking for information about the nearest garbage receptacle in the building I might ask him. If I was looking for information relating to the physics of a building collapsing I wouldn't ask him. After his 15 minutes of fame ended he converted to Islam to gain even more attention.

He's a loony tune.