Rosetta@Home - 02/05: Stats

BlackMountainCow

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,759
0
0

No new members today :(

[TA]R@H is now 108 members strong with 78 active members (72.22%).




Need some stats? Take a look at Free-DC, BOINC-Stats and BOINC-Synergy

Got some questions? Try the Official R@H FAQ (work in progress).

Want to know something about the medical relevanc of Rosetta? Take a look at this article.




Yesterday's highest overall climber: strider7 (1,434 spots)

Yesterday's highest TeAm climber: strider7 (4 spots)



Yesterday's production for TA: 85,720 (day before: 93,025 = -7,305) :thumbsdown:

TA's total score: 4,906,222

TA's RAC: 80,305 :thumbsup:

TA's world rank is: #4



Upcoming Threats: XtremeSystems - Daily Gain: -69,103.77, Days to overtake: 11.73

Upcoming Conquests: XPC - Daily Gain: 11,368, Days to overtake: 17.87




Milestone Makers:

Kelemvor passed 50,000 creds :D

strider7 passed 1,000 creds :)




Yesterday's top 25 producers:
  • Rebel Alliance (14,008 creds)
  • TeAm Enterprise (10,534 creds)
  • BadThad (6,778 creds)
  • OhioDude (5,209 creds)
  • mondobyte (3,840 creds)

  • TA_JC (3,811 creds)
  • TA_TheReaper (3,793 creds)
  • Dalephi (3,262 creds)
  • Kelemvor (3,026 creds)
  • mrwizer (2,437 creds)

  • TA_GeoffS (2,181 creds)
  • Sofa King (2,103 creds)
  • CyGoR (1,858 creds)
  • jw.middleton (1,764 creds)
  • Neurodog (1,740 creds)

  • ken008 (1,329 creds)
  • chessaroo (1,295 creds)
  • Insidious (1,188 creds)
  • uallas5 (1,087 creds)
  • Surge_On (843 creds)

  • TA_EvilWobbles (754 creds)
  • rise4310 (735 creds)
  • Strikermike (734 creds)
  • mk (682 creds)
  • TA_andy (677 creds)


SitRep for the TeAm:
  • We should pass XPC in about 18 days. :)
  • XtremeSystems will roadkill us in 12 days :(
  • We had 78 active members (72.22%) yesterday. :)
  • Congrats to strider7 for passing 1,000 creds and to Kelemvor for passing 50,000 creds :wine:



Rosetta News and Probs:

  • There appears to be a batch of bad WUs out there: O_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE. For more info, take a look here.
  • Do you have a"stuck at 1%" WU? Then please make sure to read the following thread BEFORE you abort that WU and help to get rid of that problem once and for all: Official 1% thread.
  • Do you have a WU that errored out due to Maximum CPU Time Exceeded? Then please report it here.
  • Do you have a WU that's stuck or was aborted for any other reason: Then please report it here.



:beer::p:beer:

BMC with thx to CyGoR
 

Insidious

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2001
7,649
0
0
Thanks BMC :cool:

and :beer: for the Milestone Makers! That's a BIG one for Kelemvor and a great start for Strider7

-Sid
 

Dalephi

Golden Member
Nov 30, 2003
1,997
0
0
Thanks BMC.

Congratulations to the Milestone Makers!!!:D

Those "Maximum CPU Time Exceeded" units are killing me. Most of them are on my dual core. They are up to about 220 points each when they error out.:(
 

BlackMountainCow

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,759
0
0
But you get credits for them, don't you? I once reported a "broken" WU and got credit for it after a couple of days. :)
 

Dalephi

Golden Member
Nov 30, 2003
1,997
0
0
I am not sure on that BMC. I just reported mine to Rosetta. They have not said anything about giving the credit yet.
 

BadThad

Lifer
Feb 22, 2000
12,100
49
91
Originally posted by: Dalephi
Thanks BMC.

Congratulations to the Milestone Makers!!!:D

Those "Maximum CPU Time Exceeded" units are killing me. Most of them are on my dual core. They are up to about 220 points each when they error out.:(

I hear you! The biggest issue is Rosetta is wasting CPU time and I have to keep running around to stalled machines to abort wu's. I can't take much more of this, I don't like high maintenance DC projects. They need to have some QC on their work units because I'm not going to keep spending time to manually help the project along. :|
 

JC

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
5,854
73
91
Hmmm...maybe it's because you run a lot more machines than I do, or maybe I'm just lucky, but I have only had a scarce few stuck WUs.
 

Smoke

Distributed Computing Elite Member
Jan 3, 2001
12,650
207
106
Originally posted by: BadThad
Originally posted by: Dalephi
Thanks BMC.

Congratulations to the Milestone Makers!!!:D

Those "Maximum CPU Time Exceeded" units are killing me. Most of them are on my dual core. They are up to about 220 points each when they error out.:(

I hear you! The biggest issue is Rosetta is wasting CPU time and I have to keep running around to stalled machines to abort wu's. I can't take much more of this, I don't like high maintenance DC projects. They need to have some QC on their work units because I'm not going to keep spending time to manually help the project along. :|
ditto

 

BadThad

Lifer
Feb 22, 2000
12,100
49
91
Originally posted by: Smoke
Originally posted by: BadThad
Originally posted by: Dalephi
Thanks BMC.

Congratulations to the Milestone Makers!!!:D

Those "Maximum CPU Time Exceeded" units are killing me. Most of them are on my dual core. They are up to about 220 points each when they error out.:(

I hear you! The biggest issue is Rosetta is wasting CPU time and I have to keep running around to stalled machines to abort wu's. I can't take much more of this, I don't like high maintenance DC projects. They need to have some QC on their work units because I'm not going to keep spending time to manually help the project along. :|
ditto

Feel like a babysitter yet? LOL :p
 

Freewolf

Diamond Member
Feb 15, 2001
9,673
1
81
You need to get Sid to show you how to setup boincview and it will make your life much easier.
 

GeoffS

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,583
0
71
Originally posted by: BadThad
Originally posted by: Dalephi
Thanks BMC.

Congratulations to the Milestone Makers!!!:D

Those "Maximum CPU Time Exceeded" units are killing me. Most of them are on my dual core. They are up to about 220 points each when they error out.:(

I hear you! The biggest issue is Rosetta is wasting CPU time and I have to keep running around to stalled machines to abort wu's. I can't take much more of this, I don't like high maintenance DC projects. They need to have some QC on their work units because I'm not going to keep spending time to manually help the project along. :|

Guess I'm just luckly lately... I've got seven machines running (2 are dual) and I haven't had a Max CPU Time Exceeded in quite a while (month maybe?)... scrolling though the completed work, I don't see any work that I haven't been credited for. I wonder if when my crunchers finally get around to crunching old work in my queue (reprioritized due to the change in due date that they recently made) I'll see more of these... Maybe I should just abort those old ones now and not worry about them... except for the ones that were pre-empted with lots of time already put into them...
 

Smoke

Distributed Computing Elite Member
Jan 3, 2001
12,650
207
106
Originally posted by: Freewolf
You need to get Sid to show you how to setup boincview and it will make your life much easier.

I'm running BOINC VIEW (thanks to Sid for his help). If it wasn't for Bonic View there is no telling how long some of the systems would sit there crunching away at 1%. The trouble is I only have four systems on my LAN and I'm having to "baby sit" them a lot so there is no telling how many of my distant (non-LAN) systems are also getting hung.
 

BadThad

Lifer
Feb 22, 2000
12,100
49
91
Originally posted by: Smoke
Originally posted by: Freewolf
You need to get Sid to show you how to setup boincview and it will make your life much easier.

I'm running BOINC VIEW (thanks to Sid for his help). If it wasn't for Bonic View there is no telling how long some of the systems would sit there crunching away at 1%. The trouble is I only have four systems on my LAN and I'm having to "baby sit" them a lot so there is no telling how many of my distant (non-LAN) systems are also getting hung.

Not sure that BIONC VIEW would help me. I don't want to install/use it at work where babysitting is the biggest issue. I only have local admin rights and not domain. At home, I check all the machines pretty much daily anyway. Point is, I shouldn't have to watch these things. I never had to with SETI classic, RC5 nor FaD.
 

Insidious

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2001
7,649
0
0
Hey Smoke,

I think you can also use BoincView on those remote machines as long as you get the firewalls to allow your BoincView machine to access them. (just enter their IP addys the same way as on the local LAN)

-Sid

(edit) I have only had 2 stuck WUs in the last few weeks. I can't figure out what is different for those of us not getting them.
 

Smoke

Distributed Computing Elite Member
Jan 3, 2001
12,650
207
106
Originally posted by: Insidious
Hey Smoke,

I think you can also use BoincView on those remote machines as long as you get the firewalls to allow your BoincView machine to access them. (just enter their IP addys the same way as on the local LAN)

-Sid

(edit) I have only had 2 stuck WUs in the last few weeks. I can't figure out what is different for those of us not getting them.

All of my distant systems are on dynamic IPs so Boinc View would not be practical ... unless you know a way around that? ;)

Even if I paid for a fixed IP service for all of my remote systems, it would be a PIA calling the remote "user" all the time and telling them to stop and start BOINC.



 

Insidious

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2001
7,649
0
0
My router is constantly shuffling the addys of my computers around so I entered the hostnames instead of ip addys. I wonder if some form of that works for the 'outside world'

-Sid

PS: You don't really have to stop and restart boinc. You can use boincview to abort a work unit remotely. no local ops. necessary.

you can do every boincmanager command (except stop and start boincmanager itself) remotely with boincview.

(Jeeze, it never stops.... stop giving me buttons to explore.... don't I have enough ways to break this thing already? :roll: )