http://www.unelected.org/president-paul-would-have-killed-bin-laden-earlier
Bush is the one who didn't give a flying shit about Americans. After all, it was not Paul, but rather it was Bush who taxed the hell out of them, put thousands of our troops in harms' way, and continued Clinton's dangerous, expansive, and expensive foreign policy which lead to the 9/11 attacks (assuming the WTC didn't explode from within).
The smears against Dr. Paul are really beginning to piss me off (not the least of which are the smears trying to say that he now has a far left stance on immigration).
Why do so many reporters smear Dr. Paul and either ignore Romney's shortcomings, or even worse, deliberately hide them (like how he increased taxes and expenditures in MA)?
Bush is the one who didn't give a flying shit about Americans. After all, it was not Paul, but rather it was Bush who taxed the hell out of them, put thousands of our troops in harms' way, and continued Clinton's dangerous, expansive, and expensive foreign policy which lead to the 9/11 attacks (assuming the WTC didn't explode from within).
The smears against Dr. Paul are really beginning to piss me off (not the least of which are the smears trying to say that he now has a far left stance on immigration).
Why do so many reporters smear Dr. Paul and either ignore Romney's shortcomings, or even worse, deliberately hide them (like how he increased taxes and expenditures in MA)?
Last edited: