Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 33,445
- 7,506
- 136
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
There are two aspects to consider here. Domestic policy and foreign policy. Domestically I am libertarian and adamantly oppose increases in taxation and government. This includes opposing the Patriot Act.
However, Ron Paul and I could not be more polar opposite on foreign policy. On this side of politics he sounds like the far left of the Democratic Party where as I know no one to my right on these issues. I am of the mindset of WW2 and the civil war eras, vouching for total war and unwavering forceful demand for victory and security over the threats out there.
While I?d love to find someone I agree with domestically, we?re in the beginning of a global war and when I saw Ron Paul on the debate I crossed him off my list. There?s no way I could ever cast a vote for him.
Good, the Libertarian movement needs fewer morons such as yourself. The government does a sh*tty job at things such as running public schools. What makes you so sure they can go invading any country it pleases and install democracies which is infinitely harder than running a public school? Want to know why our security is so bad? It's because we stick our noses where it doesn't belong. Even a 5 year old knows that every time you take an action, there's going to be a reaction.
A pacifist, who?ll let anyone come along and slit their throats. You may subjugate yourself to foreign militant ideologies; I intend to advocate something more natural. Perhaps before you object to our government raising a military to deal with foreign fighters, you should read up on the basic purposes of a government.
As for every action having an equal and opposite reaction. Where is our reaction to having war declared on us? That is what you stand against and what I stand for.
If the libertarian party is to be a bunch of small government liberals then you?re right, I shall have nothing to do with it.