Ron Paul agrees with Time magazine....

Status
Not open for further replies.

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Just when you thought stranger things could happen....Ron paul steps up to the plate....too funny!!!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ul-bernanke-deserves-person-of-the-year-honor

One of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's biggest critics said that he deserves Time magazine's "Person of the Year" award bestowed to him on Wednesday. [/v]


Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), one of Bernanke's greatest critic, said that the award is fitting because Bernanke is the "most powerful man in the world."


MSNBC's Joe Scarborough said that Paul had admitted off camera that Bernanke deserved the award because of his economic power. Paul replied "He is. He is the most powerful man in the world. I believe a case can be made for that... He controls the supply of money, which is the reserve currency of the world."

The Texas congressman added "He could create a trillion dollars in secret without any monitoring of the Congress...I think he's more powerful than the president."

Paul is an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve, oftentimes saying it should be disbanded. Paul amendment's requiring an audit of the Fed's monetary activities was included in the financial regulatory overhaul bill passed by the House last week.

Bernanke was awarded the title on Wednesday morning. A number of other public officials were selected as finalists such as President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Afghanistan commanding Gen. Stanley McChrystal.




Time names Bernanke Person of the Year December 16, 2009 4:24 p.m. EST

CNN) -- Time magazine on Wednesday named Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as its 2009 Person of the Year, calling him "the most powerful nerd on the planet."

Bernanke will be featured on the cover of the magazine that hits stores Friday.

He beat out Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt, President Obama, Apple CEO Steve Jobs and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi among other finalists.

Time said Bernanke was the reason the U.S. financial crisis wasn't worse.

"The story of the year was a weak economy that could have been much, much weaker. Thank the man who runs the Federal Reserve, our mild-mannered economic overlord," the article said.



Video: An editor on Time's selection RELATED TOPICS
Ben Bernanke
U.S. Federal Reserve
Time Inc.
National Economy
"He didn't just reshape U.S. monetary policy; he led an effort to save the world economy."

Time: Person of the Year 2009

Bernanke is considered a scholar of the Great Depression. A series of his writings were compiled into the book "Essays of the Great Depression."

Michael Grunwald, who authored Time's article, on Wednesday told NBC's "Today" that "basically [Bernanke] saw what looked like another depression coming, and he decided he would do whatever it takes to forestall that. And basically, I think he did. It could have been a lot worse."

Grunwald said, "There are things that he could have done better. One of his responsibilities is for full employment in society, and he hasn't really stepped up on that, but basically in terms of influencing how the economy went this year, Bernanke was the guy."

The Time senior correspondent added, "Look, he's been criticized from left and right, from liberals and conservatives, you know, for ... running the unelected fourth branch of government. He's a controversial figure."

Wednesday's announcement comes a day before a Senate Banking Committee vote on whether Bernanke should be given another term.

"Remember, he's a Republican appointed by a Democratic president. It's the Democrats on the committee that are going to vote to confirm. It's a really interesting combination of factors," Grunwald said.

One of Bernanke's harshest critics is Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Kentucky, the only senator to vote against the economist's appointment four years ago by President Bush.

In a statement Wednesday, Bunning said, "I find it ironic that a man who has spent the last year rewarding others for failure is now being named 'Person of the Year.'

"But if Time magazine is in the business of rewarding failure, Ben Bernanke is their man -- he has certainly excelled at that."

Bunning called Bernanke a "moral hazard," accusing him of supporting the "easy money policies of his predecessor, Alan Greenspan," who made the cover of Time in February 1999, along with then-Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and his successor, Lawrence H. Summers.

Another sharp critic of Bernanke, independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, said December 2 that he plans to place a "hold" on Bernanke's nomination for a second term once it leaves the Banking Committee.

A "hold" is an informal practice in which a senator informs the majority leader that he or she does not want a bill or nomination to reach the floor for a vote.

Majority leader Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nevada, would not need to act on Sanders' request, but Sanders could launch a filibuster to delay the motion to nominate the Fed chairman for another four-year term.

"The American people overwhelmingly voted last year for a change in our national priorities to put the interests of ordinary people ahead of the greed of Wall Street and the wealthy few," Sanders said then, explaining his action.

"What the American people did not bargain for was another four years for one of the key architects of the Bush economy."

Time magazine noted that Bernanke, who turned 56 Sunday, defies the stereotype of "a typical Beltway power broker."

"He doesn't have a commanding presence. He isn't a mesmerizing speaker. He has none of the look-at-me swagger or listen-to-me charisma so common among men with oversize Washington offices," the article said.

Bernanke was sworn in as Federal Reserve chairman in February 2006. He spent years in academia, as a professor at Princeton, Stanford and New York universities and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, according to the Fed's Web site.
 
Last edited:

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
POY doesn't necessarily mean good. Of course, POY is junk these days anyways. Giulani, whistleblowers, you, et cetera.
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Hitler won POY in like 43 or 44, didn't he? Like MotF said, it is about the person's ability to change the world that year and the importance of what thy did; not the good or bad they did.
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Also, I am having trouble figuring out what is quoted from articles and where is your commentary.

Might want to clean it up a little or it might get locked (no offense, just hate seeing a potentially good debate stifled).
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Also, I am having trouble figuring out what is quoted from articles and where is your commentary.

Might want to clean it up a little or it might get locked (no offense, just hate seeing a potentially good debate stifled).

open your eyes...it`s there......muahahaaaa
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Why does anyone care what Ron Paul says????

Ron Paul has no real following and despite all efforts to puff up his influence in 2008, it was an epic fail.

Shall we next waste forum space on what my wife's hairdressers niece has to say? It would be equally productive.

Now if we want to talk about the policies of Ben Bernanke, and some of the mistakes I think he has made, and the snowballs chance of getting someone better, there is a thread topic that would be better without citing Ron Paul.

Sadly because the political unity is almost zero today, I doubt if enough opposition will ever agree and come together to prevent Bernanke's reappointment.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Why does anyone care what Ron Paul says????

Ron Paul has no real following and despite all efforts to puff up his influence in 2008, it was an epic fail.

Shall we next waste forum space on what my wife's hairdressers niece has to say? It would be equally productive.

Now if we want to talk about the policies of Ben Bernanke, and some of the mistakes I think he has made, and the snowballs chance of getting someone better, there is a thread topic that would be better without citing Ron Paul.

Sadly because the political unity is almost zero today, I doubt if enough opposition will ever agree and come together to prevent Bernanke's reappointment.
Careful, dude, you're insulting a very vocal 1% of America. What's next, dissing Kucinich?
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
Why does anyone care what Ron Paul says????

Ron Paul has no real following and despite all efforts to puff up his influence in 2008, it was an epic fail.

Shall we next waste forum space on what my wife's hairdressers niece has to say? It would be equally productive.

Now if we want to talk about the policies of Ben Bernanke, and some of the mistakes I think he has made, and the snowballs chance of getting someone better, there is a thread topic that would be better without citing Ron Paul.

Sadly because the political unity is almost zero today, I doubt if enough opposition will ever agree and come together to prevent Bernanke's reappointment.

Bullshit he has no real following.. http://www.campaignforliberty.com/

Ron Paul has been a staple on financial news programs ever since the recession has started. The entire reason the Federal Reserve is in the center of the spotlight is because Ron Paul brought attention to it.

His book, 'End the Fed' debuted at #6 on the New York Times Bestseller list and still currently sits at #19 in Amazon's list..

http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers...5Fts%5Fb%5Fnav

'No real following' What constitutes a real following?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.