- Feb 6, 2002
- 38,742
- 31,787
- 136
The Romney camp in an attempt to defend ad where someone claimed Romney cancelled his healthcare and didn't care, said if he had healthcare in Massachusetts he would have been fine. Remember Romney said his Mass plan should be a model for the nation
Before anyone accuses me of title malpractice I defer to the creator of healthcare reform in both Massaschusetts and at the federal level
Wow!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021093946Mitt Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul appeared on Fox News Wednesday morning to criticize a controversial Priorities USA ad, which implies that the former Bain Capital executive is to blame for a womans death after her husband was laid off by the company. But in absolving Romney of responsibility, Saul awkwardly embraced the individual mandate and other provisions in the Massachusetts health care law that Romney has pledged to repeal for the nation as part of his attack on Obamacare.
Before anyone accuses me of title malpractice I defer to the creator of healthcare reform in both Massaschusetts and at the federal level
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...care-differ-only-in-inconsequential-ways.htmlThe problem for Romney is that there are no fundamental differences between the two laws. Both programs create exchanges where private insurers compete. Both require individuals to purchase insurance. And both subsidize those who cant afford it. Its a relatively new way of extending coverage. Massachusetts was the first place it was adopted, and the Affordable Care Act was the second. The two laws are, in the words of Jonathan Gruber, who helped design both the Romney and Obama plans, the same fucking bill.
Wow!