Rollseyes to Zuni

[jjones]

Zuni, i don't know if you saw this posted in the other thread that everyone was thanking you for the rollseyes emoticon but I made one that has the same style as the rest of the emoticons.

rollseyes

It's all yours if you want to use it. 🙂

 

[Azraele]

That's a nice idea. One of the misgivings I had about the eyeroll is that it didn't quite match the others.

 

[Migroo]

Agreed.

 

[compuwiz1]

 

[Hossenfeffer]

Sounds like a plan



(Now I just need to design a "Delete" button for PM's and I'm sure we'll see that implemented as well 😉 )

 

[Jeff7]

The linked one does match the rest perfectly.

Us Anandtechers are never happy, are we. 😀

 

[IndyJaws]

Zuni,

Thanks very much for the rolling eyes emoticon! I'm sure you did it to shut up all the requests, but thanks nonetheless! 😀

 

[Rainguy]

I like it......I like any new toys to play with here 😀

 

[John]

Nice match jjones.

 

[Jason Clark]

We wont be changing them guys, as bandwidth is important here we'll stick with the file size we have now which is 500bytes, vs. jjones image which is over 2K. Thanks for the work though jones.

 

[sciencewhiz]

Is 638 bytes small enough?

 

[Hossenfeffer]

Translation: In order to keep bandwidth consumption as streamlined as possible, we would need a much smaller version of this better match (currently 2k or so). Pare it down to 500-600 bytes and you might have a deal, until then, shut up and enjoy the icon 😉

 

[Jason Clark]

Problem with the icon is it doesnt have the same facial look. When you roll your eyes at something it is intended to be a not impressed kind of look, his guy is smiling almost which throws off the meaning, fix that and make it 600bytes or less and we'll see.

 

[gwlam12]

LOL its smiling

 

[b0mbrman]

<< Problem with the icon is it doesnt have the same facial look. When you roll your eyes at something it is intended to be a not impressed kind of look, his guy is smiling almost which throws off the meaning, fix that and make it 600bytes or less and we'll see. >>



It could definitely use more sass