Originally posted by: misle
[One more question:
What's the difference between an IRA and a Roth IRA?
Traditional IRA: Contributions are made pre-tax and earnings are tax deferred. Translation: contributions to a traditional IRA can be deducted on your income taxes. You do not pay taxes on these funds until you take a distribution. The idea being that when you are retired, you are in a lower tax bracket.
Roth IRA: Contributions are made after-tax (money you have already paid income taxes on). Advantage: With a Roth IRA, any earnings are never taxed. That's right, never. You also can take a distribution of principal (contributions you made) at any time without penalty or taxes. You may only take a distribution of earnings once you are 59-1/2, or else you pay penalties. You must meet certain income requirements to be able to contribute to a Roth.
A lot of people on ATOT answer Roth IRA no matter what the question, however, I suggest you meet with a financial consultant (a certified FC, not an ATOT armchair investor) to discuss retirement planning, and also talk to a tax professional to discuss tax implications of a Traditional IRA vs Roth. A good FC and tax professional will look at *YOUR* circumstances and make appropriate suggestions. You may find that Roth always isn't the right answer.........
On edit: so what's the difference between Roth and Traditional IRA's in a nutshell: how contributions and earnings are taxed. Both plans will have equal earnings potential when equally invested.
Also on edit: so you are saying that this plan was entirely funded by your employer? If so, that sounds similar to a SEP IRA (except it isn't in this case). If you provide more details, I can provide more insight. Do you want to take this discussion to PM?