Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
It's rediculous to ask Hamm to make this right because HE DID NOTHING WRONG. He didn't bribe the judges. They messed up. Hamm won gold and now to try and go back to correct it is crazy. Think about it. If we go back say "oh, this was a mistake and he should have been given .1 pts higher" what sort of impact does that have on the competition? We can't say that everything would have turned out exactly the same way, so how can we go back and say that the Korean "should have" won the gold? I hate to say it, but the events that transpired in the scoring influenced the event, and, thus, changing the Korean's score could have potentially altered the entire medal standings.
On top of that, why don't we go back and exam all the film with a fine-toothed comb? I'm sure we can find other judging mistakes that influence the event as well. Where do we draw the line when we are trying to correct for mistakes like this?
People should recognize that, like anything, humans make mistakes and nomatter how much technology we add into judging sports like gymnastics, there is always a subjective interpretation by a human. Thus, there will be mistakes, but trying to place the blame on an American athlete who simply competed is absurd.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
It's rediculous to ask Hamm to make this right because HE DID NOTHING WRONG. He didn't bribe the judges. They messed up. Hamm won gold and now to try and go back to correct it is crazy. Think about it. If we go back say "oh, this was a mistake and he should have been given .1 pts higher" what sort of impact does that have on the competition? We can't say that everything would have turned out exactly the same way, so how can we go back and say that the Korean "should have" won the gold? I hate to say it, but the events that transpired in the scoring influenced the event, and, thus, changing the Korean's score could have potentially altered the entire medal standings.
On top of that, why don't we go back and exam all the film with a fine-toothed comb? I'm sure we can find other judging mistakes that influence the event as well. Where do we draw the line when we are trying to correct for mistakes like this?
People should recognize that, like anything, humans make mistakes and nomatter how much technology we add into judging sports like gymnastics, there is always a subjective interpretation by a human. Thus, there will be mistakes, but trying to place the blame on an American athlete who simply competed is absurd.
Originally posted by: Rufio
WTF!
I think Paul Hamm and Yang should have a breakdance battle for the medal!!!!
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Originally posted by: Rufio
WTF!
I think Paul Hamm and Yang should have a breakdance battle for the medal!!!!
<Zoolander>"They're breakdance fighting!"</Zoolander>
Originally posted by: BaboonGuy
I think they should share the medal personally.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
What a crock of sh!t. Talk about liberal ideolgy at work!
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
What a crock of sh!t. Talk about liberal ideolgy at work!
Your a fscking idiot I swear. Hamm does not DESERVE this medal. Regardless of how the judges messed up, it says a lot about the character of Paul Hamm. I think it is a very selfish move on his part to keep the medal. The right thing to do would be to give up the medal to the Korean, Hamm did not earn this medal fairly.
In all of this discussion, I ask you how must the Korean guy be feeling? He worked his butt off his whole life to train for this one moment, and now its ruined because of a technicality that was entirely out of his hands. Hamm can make this right and give back the medal. Otherwise, he will always be remembered for NOT actually winning the gold medal.
No, there are rules in place for contesting this type of scoring error. Since the Korean's coach didn't contest the score on the floor, that night, they forfeited their claim. There has to be an end to every game, and that is set by the rules. The rules were not followed (by the coach to correct the score) and they lost the medal, according to the rules.Originally posted by: Sudheer AnneThe right thing to do would be to give up the medal to the Korean, Hamm did not earn this medal fairly.
No, we would have contested the score before it became a problem, like we did twice in the mens all around. The blame falls squarely on the judges AND, perhaps most importantly, the Korean coach(s).Originally posted by: new2AMD
All I know is that if America got screwed out of the medal we would be going nuts also.
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
What a crock of sh!t. Talk about liberal ideolgy at work!
Your a fscking idiot I swear. Hamm does not DESERVE this medal. Regardless of how the judges messed up, it says a lot about the character of Paul Hamm. I think it is a very selfish move on his part to keep the medal. The right thing to do would be to give up the medal to the Korean, Hamm did not earn this medal fairly.
In all of this discussion, I ask you how must the Korean guy be feeling? He worked his butt off his whole life to train for this one moment, and now its ruined because of a technicality that was entirely out of his hands. Hamm can make this right and give back the medal. Otherwise, he will always be remembered for NOT actually winning the gold medal.
No one will care how he won it in a few years. They will only remember how f'ed up the judges were in the 2004 Olympics. I think a precedence was set in Canada for the winter Olympics where they issued a second Gold Medal for their FU. Pony up the funds and get another Gold