Robert Blake: Did he do it? Your opinion?

[MichaelD]

If this is a repost of a repost, I aplogize in advance and request lockage. That said.

Here's the link to the CNN story

I think he did it. He married his wife under duress, basically. Addtionally, his wife was a known "extortionist" and had already bilked/pressured money out of former husbands.

I think he did it and he will go down in flames for it. The court system will not permit another OJ. What's your take, ATOT?

 

[Lucky]

dont know if he'll be found guilty but I think he is.

No hard evidence, but there is the bodyguard, the filed-down gun (thats his), the unwanted marriage from a hollywood gold digger...so much.

 

[Pliablemoose]

Pretty sure there won't be rioting if he's convicted.

I'd love to see a real jury of his peers, Todd Bridges, Gary Coleman, etc...

 

[pulse8]

I don't know enough about the case to really say if he did it or not.

 

[sohcrates]

I just wonder why anyone cares...he hasn't been in the public eye for years.

I think everyone just wanted something to take their minds off terrorism for awhile...

Did anyone see SNL sat? They sorta made fun of that aspect in the opening sketch...

 

[pulse8]

<< I just wonder why anyone cares...he hasn't been in the public eye for years. >>

Doesn't matter. People still know who he is and he's being charged with murder.

 

[sohcrates]

<<

<< I just wonder why anyone cares...he hasn't been in the public eye for years. >>

Doesn't matter. People still know who he is and he's being charged with murder. >>



true.

so anyway, yeah, he did it. pretty straightforward...

the worst part is him going back into the restaurant to look for a FRIGGIN' GUN!

it's just an awful case, and it looks like 'da police took their time with this one...lots of evidence (35,000 pages of it is what i heard)

 

[MazerRackham]

Yeah I think he did it... who else would want his wife dead besides him? I can never figure out why people are so stupid as to think that they won't be considered suspects with such lame alibis.

 

[MichaelD]

<< it's just an awful case, and it looks like 'da police took their time with this one...lots of evidence (35,000 pages of it is what i heard) >>




I'm thinking along the same lines. They started out w/the intention of nailing his butt to the wall right from the get-go. 35K pages of evidence sounds pretty damning to me!:Q (how do you get 35K pages of evidence anyway?)

 

[Tripleshot]

After the way the LAPD screwed up the OJ case, I will wait to see a confession before I believe he did it just based on circumstancial evidence. His friends and people who have known him alot longer than any of us argue he could not have done it, its not in him to do something like that.

At any rate, this whole thing is confusing as to motive and why he would kill his wife as apposed to just filing a freaking divorce. Somthing doesn't add up here. That is why we need to see the evidence, not inuendo, to make a clear judgement.

A man is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. I hope we don't lose sight of that precious law. The rush to judgement is not the foundation to due process. Hard evidence, witnesses,and a confession can be the compelling factors to sway me, but I do not believe any of that has been established yet.

 

[pulse8]

<< Yeah I think he did it... who else would want his wife dead besides him? >>

From what I've heard, lots of people wouldn't have minded her dead. She screwed over a bunch of people using some kind of scam.

 

[MichaelD]

<< After the way the LAPD screwed up the OJ case, I will wait to see a confession before I believe he did it just based on circumstancial evidence. His friends and people who have known him alot longer than any of us argue he could not have done it, its not in him to do something like that.

At any rate, this whole thing is confusing as to motive and why he would kill his wife as apposed to just filing a freaking divorce. Somthing doesn't add up here. That is why we need to see the evidence, not inuendo, to make a clear judgement.

A man is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. I hope we don't lose sight of that precious law. The rush to judgement is not the foundation to due process. Hard evidence, witnesses,and a confession can be the compelling factors to sway me, but I do not believe any of that has been established yet. >>




Hi Shot3 (get it? )

I agree w/you 100%. Innocent until proven guilty. I also agree w/Pulse8; she screwed-over many guys,any number of which would like to see her get whacked. But the cops just seem so unusually methodical about this one. All the paper trails and all that. Almost as if they actually did this one the right way or something ludicrous like that.

 

[toant103]

Quilty