• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

Rihanna's lingerie line is offering crotchless, butt-revealing leggings. The internet isn't sure it wants them

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
28,042
5,101
126
Not seen the back side of a g-string before? Not that you're wrong, mind you.
Those kinda looked like they were attached to the tights! I could see all sorts of weird tension going on! It would saw you in half!


On a different note, I think she looks fine.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: pcgeek11

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
18,261
2,122
126
Can you even imagine how huge that rear end is going to be in 20 years. She is going to look like a pear.

1623898897938.png

:oops:
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,491
4,669
136
Psh every type of lingerie already exists... Named brand and expensive vs. cheap... Every fetish of every kind.

The trouble is getting the wife to actually wear it more than once ;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Captante

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
33,357
12,144
146
Plenty of peeps like bigger gals. I'm not of the mindset to immediately write off someone like that, but I have my limits.

Ladies in post #3 and #15 are all ok.
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,491
4,669
136
Aren't we as humans ultimately supposed to biologically find bigger women more attractive?

Not talking obese here - more of bigger boobs instead of flat-chested, wider hips for child rearing, etc?
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY