Rick Santorumm is "suspending" his campaign.

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,816
83
91
I'm assuming this is being prompted by his daughter's continuing health problems, and that's sad.

but I won't miss having to see his bigoted face on the news every night.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,523
8,541
146
I'm assuming this is being prompted by his daughter's continuing health problems, and that's sad.

but I won't miss having to see his bigoted face on the news every night.

I think is more related to the fact that if he has any plans to run in 2016, if Obama wins, he needs to get out now before he were to lose Pennsylvania. The damage that could do to his future plans of running could be insurmountable, particularly given the fact he was trashed in PA the last time he ran.

There was no way he was going to win so why do further damage now?
 
Last edited:

DesiPower

Lifer
Nov 22, 2008
15,366
740
126
One has to wonder, did that guy really think he had a chance against Obummer....
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
34,521
25,338
136
Why do candidates suspend their campaigns when dropping out instead of ending them? Not likely Rick will start it up again.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
71,406
5,757
126
The Republican party has collided with some huge wall on the right and is in a state of compression and will soon come racing back to the left. As I said, Romney will run left of Obama. It's Happy happy happy now with women. Republican love women, just ask Republican women.

Evanjellycals will soon be the new fruits in a bottle.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,816
83
91
Why do candidates suspend their campaigns when dropping out instead of ending them? Not likely Rick will start it up again.
1) "just in case" (what if irrefutable proof comes out tomorrow that Mitt Romney was secretly born in Kenya and is ineligible to become President?)

2) it allows them to continue raising funds to pay off any campaign debt (this was a big issue for Hillary in 2008)
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
81,367
43,498
136
So, I'm guessing he's conceding to Ron Paul? :biggrin:

Yeap. Ron Paul has claimed yet another victory.

There was never a meaningful doubt that the nominee would be anyone other than Romney. I've been calling it for a very long time now. My new prediction for Santorum is (assuming Obama wins) that he will return to much fanfare in 2016... and go nowhere. The pundits will be baffled as to why he did so well in 2012 and so poorly in 2016. The coverage will be every bit as vapid and useless as it was this year when they covered it like his candidacy had a chance.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Santorum dropping out is long overdue. As soon as it became clear that Romney was going to win the nomination, all the other candidates should have dropped out for the greater good. The best (only) chance they have of getting rid of obummer is forming a united front behind someone. Prolonged infighting over the GOP candidacy only helps keep the current regime in place.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
I thought the Primary season went from December until the last man standing or the convention?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
348
126
The Republican party has collided with some huge wall on the right and is in a state of compression and will soon come racing back to the left.

No, they won't. That's not how the party of privilege works.

The last the time the 'Republicans' went through this unpopularity, they rode it all the way to ending the party (the Whigs, replaced by the 'new' Republican party).

King George III lost the colonies rather than make a few modest compromises. The French and the Czar lost their lives rather than soften conditions.

The Republican party has really only gone one direction since it was founded - with a few compromises during the 'liberal era' from FDR to Carter. And far right since then.

In 1980, the Republicans learned they could be up a 'radical right-wing' candidate who had been trounced 4 years before - and win big. The lesson - go to the right more.

That's why in this primary, when one might think the candidate best to beat Obama would be more moderate, the party has gone more and more to the right.

Why Romney has embraced the further right position on basically every issue, however much it shows him a liar and hypocrite, it's what's needed to win that party.

They weren't ashamed for losing by picking the 'radical right' guy in 1964 with Goldwater - they just learned how to campaign more effectly and make money more important.

They aren't 'going left' to get elected, they're suppressing Democratic voters. They're giving wealthy donors an even larger say.

Of course Romney will now etch a sketch to the left, but that's not 'the party' doing so.

As they say, Reagan couldn't get elected today by them; having shifted wealth to the top to historic highs, the policy they all pushed it to move more to the top.

That's their policy, their agenda, their base. All the rest is marketing, including compromise.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,760
6,141
126
Gingrich and Santorum should have flipped a coin for who would stay in. They would have had a better chance beating Romney if only one of them stayed in, even accounting for the 50% chance of losing the coin toss.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY