- Nov 10, 2003
- 17,986
- 1,388
- 126
Never heard most of these places before.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-affluent-town-in-every-state-163428020.html
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-affluent-town-in-every-state-163428020.html
The bottom half of the states range from $77k to $135k. That's affluent?
Ah, fuck Belle Meade...their police suck, and they're nothing more than a neighborhood in terms of size. They actually make a point to pull you over when you go 31 in the perpetual 30mph limit and tell you that they pulled you over for doing 1mph over.
Hell, it wouldn't even be a city if it wasn't populated by the super rich. It's only about 3 miles in area.
Are we looking at the same map? In the bottom half I see:The bottom half of the states range from $77k to $135k. That's affluent?
Median income means these are generally places where well-off people are living near other well-off people. The rich and super rich may not always be in large communities of other rich people, especially the ones who can afford state park-sized properties.
So at the least these towns are likely to have more affluent residents and less abject poor than other places, though I'm sure there are neighborhoods and areas in cities where you can find millionaires and billionaires who are far richer. In large cities, especially, there isn't a huge geographical distance separating the rich and poor like there can be in the suburbs or rural areas.
If you look at the map, it's the less densely populated - but not necessarily poorer - states with lower median invoked in their "richest" towns.
The bottom half of the states range from $77k to $135k. That's affluent?
What's interesting is so many richest towns are right on the border line to the next state. Why is that?
I was assuming I would see Brentwood or Franklin on there. Still not towns. Franklin desperately wants to be, but it's still just functionally an outlying suburb of Nashville. That happens to have their own good ol' boy dickhole police force.
Belle Meade, though? Lulz. That's more like a subdivision.
I'm guessing most of that map is similar...just small exclusive 'communities' that are not much more than a clump of really big houses.
Are we looking at the same map? In the bottom half I see:
Piney Pointe Village, TX - $233k
Hidden Hills, CA - $250k
Belle Meade, TN - $213k
Don't see any 77k place either in the lower half. In fact, of the lowest ranked 10 states on the list, 7 of them are on the upper half of the states.
You understand that $75K somewhere can be better than $135K elsewhere? With low cost housing and low property/local taxes, you still get to be in low enough tax bracket to not pay much for federal taxes, and plus you are eligible for many tax breaks that are gone after $110K or so in income.
With $75K income you can afford $250K house, which is usually great home in low cost cities, and on $135K income you can't afford $1M house which is average home in high cost areas.
Berkeley Lake is around 5 minutes from where I live. I don't get the impression that it's the most affluent town.