Richard Hatch Guilty of Tax Evasion

Reckoner

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
10,851
1
81
Link


By Ray Henry, Associated Press Writer | January 25, 2006

PROVIDENCE, R.I. --Richard Hatch, the "fat naked guy" who won $1 million in the debut season of the reality show "Survivor," was found guilty Wednesday of failing to pay taxes on his winnings.

Hatch was handcuffed and taken into custody after U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres said he was a potential flight risk.

He was also convicted of evading taxes on $327,000 he earned as co-host of a Boston radio show and $28,000 in rent on property he owned, but he was acquitted of seven bank, mail and wire fraud charges. Jurors deliberated for less than a day after more than a week of testimony.

Hatch, 44, of Newport, faces up to 13 years in prison and a fine of $600,000. Sentencing was scheduled for April 28.

In addition to the tax charges, prosecutors accused Hatch of using money donated to his charitable foundation, Horizon Bound, an outdoors program he planned to open for troubled youth. He allegedly spent the money on expenses including tips to a limousine driver, dry cleaning and tens of thousands of dollars on improvements to a house he owned.

One possible explanation for Hatch's failure to pay taxes was raised by his lawyer toward the end of the trial but was never mentioned in the jury's presence.

Hatch's lawyer, Michael Minns, said Hatch caught fellow contestants cheating and struck a deal with producers for the show to pay his taxes if he won. But, ultimately, Hatch was never asked about the allegation when he testified.

Instead, Minns told jurors Hatch was the "world's worst bookkeeper" and said his client never meant to do anything wrong. Hatch testified that he thought producers were supposed to pay his "Survivor" taxes, and said the donations he took from his charity were far less than the money he had already poured into it.

More than five years after winning, Hatch remains reality TV's most famous villain, the man viewers loved to hate. He first captured their attention for shedding his clothes on "Survivor," prompting David Letterman to dub him "the fat naked guy."

But he made the biggest impression -- and won the show -- by scheming his way to the top. He reveled as squabbles among his fellow contestants thinned their ranks, connived with teammates to stick together then pitted his allies against each other.

Early on, he used his success on the show to get more work, including a "Got Milk?" ad and an appearance on "Survivor All-Stars" -- where he was promptly voted off by fellow contestants.

He also appeared on TV game shows, including "The Weakest Link." That appearance, made on behalf of Horizon Bound, netted a $10,000 donation to his charity camp -- money prosecutors said was among the funds misused.

But Hatch's shrewdness did not serve him well in the legal world. A year ago, prosecutors offered him a deal: plead guilty to two counts of tax evasion and they would recommend less than the maximum 10-year sentence.

After initially agreeing, Hatch walked away, retaining Minns as his new lawyer and appearing on NBC's "Today" show to claim that CBS was supposed to pay the taxes.

Prosecutors responded with a grand jury, which indicted Hatch on 10 counts carrying a maximum of 73 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines.

During the trial, prosecutors called a string of witnesses, including Mark Burnett, executive producer of "Survivor."

Burnett testified that Hatch's "Survivor" contract stated he would have to pay taxes on his prize. Minns never asked him about the cheating allegation, and Burnett and CBS declined to comment about it.

One of Hatch's ex-boyfriends testified that Hatch forged his name on legal documents. One of Hatch's accountants testified that Hatch filed a return omitting his million-dollar "Survivor" prize the same day he agreed to her in writing that that he would not send it to the IRS.
 

MasterAndCommander

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2004
3,656
0
71
Originally posted by: Bryan
Well, at least he won't mind Federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.


:laugh:


For a minute I was worried because I thought it was Richard Hatch - the actor who played Apollo on the original BSG series.
 

Shadowknight

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
3,959
3
81
Originally posted by: MasterAndCommander
Originally posted by: Bryan
Well, at least he won't mind Federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.


:laugh:


For a minute I was worried because I thought it was Richard Hatch - the actor who played Apollo on the original BSG series.

He also plays Tom Zarak on the current BSG, so that would screw up the current series, which would have sucked.

This article made me think of Al Capone, how they had to nail him on tax evasion charges since they couldn't get him on his organized crime setup. In this case, I think they got him on tax evasion since they couldn't find a law on the books for being an ugly guy walking around naked on tv.
 
Jun 19, 2004
10,860
1
81
He's an attention whore, he'll find some way to milk this. Maybe they can do a "Survivor: Prison Break" reality show. Instead of getting voted off the island though you'd either get shanked or get the chair!

I'm calling up CBS now!!!
 

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
i think this is fvcking rediculous, the owner of that nightclub that killed 100 people got 4 years. 48 months for the deaths of 100 people and he get 51 months for not paying $500,000 or so to the government, something is seriously wrong here
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: TheSiege
i think this is fvcking rediculous, the owner of that nightclub that killed 100 people got 4 years. 48 months for the deaths of 100 people and he get 51 months for not paying $500,000 or so to the government, something is seriously wrong here

yeap.


 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
How on earth did he think he would get away with this? Millions of people saw him win $1 million on TV, which was presented to him by a major television network. Did he not think the IRS would get wind of it?
 

Amplifier

Banned
Dec 25, 2004
3,143
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: TheSiege
i think this is fvcking rediculous, the owner of that nightclub that killed 100 people got 4 years. 48 months for the deaths of 100 people and he get 51 months for not paying $500,000 or so to the government, something is seriously wrong here

yeap.

No, those 100 people are responsible for their own submissions to the Darwin awards, the manager's only crime was using pyrotechnics without a permit.
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: Amplifier
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: TheSiege
i think this is fvcking rediculous, the owner of that nightclub that killed 100 people got 4 years. 48 months for the deaths of 100 people and he get 51 months for not paying $500,000 or so to the government, something is seriously wrong here

yeap.

No, those 100 people are responsible for their own submissions to the Darwin awards, the manager's only crime was using pyrotechnics without a permit.

Darwin awards? WTF is wrong with you?

The band manager shouldn't have seen any punishment whatsoever, the owner of the venue should face charges (he let too many people in).

You have to have some serious issues to blame those who died though. Sometimes the only honest answer is "Sh!t happens." It's not always anyone's fault.

Viper GTS
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Amplifier
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: TheSiege
i think this is fvcking rediculous, the owner of that nightclub that killed 100 people got 4 years. 48 months for the deaths of 100 people and he get 51 months for not paying $500,000 or so to the government, something is seriously wrong here

yeap.

No, those 100 people are responsible for their own submissions to the Darwin awards, the manager's only crime was using pyrotechnics without a permit.

Darwin awards? WTF is wrong with you?

The band manager shouldn't have seen any punishment whatsoever, the owner of the venue should face charges (he let too many people in).

You have to have some serious issues to blame those who died though. Sometimes the only honest answer is "Sh!t happens." It's not always anyone's fault.

Viper GTS

Not to mention the issues with the fire inspectors (or lack there of), the materials used and numerous other safety requirements that were never addressed. The most you can blame those 100 people for is having bad taste in music.
 

Amplifier

Banned
Dec 25, 2004
3,143
0
0
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Amplifier

No, those 100 people are responsible for their own submissions to the Darwin awards, the manager's only crime was using pyrotechnics without a permit.

Darwin awards? WTF is wrong with you?

The band manager shouldn't have seen any punishment whatsoever, the owner of the venue should face charges (he let too many people in).

You have to have some serious issues to blame those who died though. Sometimes the only honest answer is "Sh!t happens." It's not always anyone's fault.

Viper GTS

Not to mention the issues with the fire inspectors (or lack there of), the materials used and numerous other safety requirements that were never addressed. The most you can blame those 100 people for is having bad taste in music.

Guys I've seen the video. The people had enough time to escape but they panicked, end of story.
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
Man, has anyone read the indictment at The Smoking Gun? This dude was dirty! He actually had taxes prepared by an accountant for the survivor money, and then had a second return prepared for information purposes only that didn't include the survivor money. This return had him actually getting over $4000 back. The accountant signed a document saying that return was just for information, and didn't sign the tax return. Hatch submitted it anyway, and collected the $4K.

Then, this fool agreed to be on a TV show called "For Goodness Sake" which was supposed to be about charity work, raising money, etc. He agreed to be on for $25,000 issued to a charity of his choice. They cut a check to a charity called "Horizon Bound." He then took the check, added himself as an additional payee, and deposited it in his personal account and spent it. What a dirty, lying scumbag!