• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Richard Dawkins Reads Love Letters...

😀😀

Funny, rather sad that at least some of them are authentic, but I suspect some might just be people wanting to hear him read their posts.
 
There are two kinds of faith, one based on fear and one caused by the experience of love that is self evidently divine. They are completely different things and express in completely different ways.
 
>When you are an idiot,

Science says you are an idiot, and carefully explains why

Religion says you are perfect
 
I watched half the video and the first thing I thought of is: "This is so fake."

I don't know of any Christians who would write/say that type of stuff to Richard Dawkins, except maybe 10 year old boys. But 10 year old boys would have no clue who Richard Dawkins is... When the shoe fits...
 
brandonb said:
I watched half the video and the first thing I thought of is: "This is so fake."

I don't know of any Christians who would write/say that type of stuff to Richard Dawkins, except maybe 10 year old boys. But 10 year old boys would have no clue who Richard Dawkins is... When the shoe fits...
Click to expand...

Read some youtube comments. There are plenty out there who would say such things.
 
Retro Rob said:
Saw it myself, and its a clevery edited documentary.
Click to expand...

Surprisingly enough most documentaries are cleverly edited, including <shock> "religious" ones.

Your willingness to consistently point out the mote in your neighbor's eye while ignoring the log in yours never fails to disappoint.
 
alzan said:
Surprisingly enough most documentaries are cleverly edited, including <shock> "religious" ones.

Your willingness to consistently point out the mote in your neighbor's eye while ignoring the log in yours never fails to disappoint.
Click to expand...

So, stating a fact about how religilous was edited is hypocritical? How so?

Did I condemn religilous for its editing?
 
Retro Rob said:
So, stating a fact about how religilous was edited is hypocritical? How so?

Did I condemn religilous for its editing?
Click to expand...

Personally, I wondered as to what you meant, but did not come to a judgment since I saw no way to divine your intention. Perhaps you could elaborate on why you mentioned careful editing.
 
Atreus21 said:
Dawkins is an arrogant prick.

There I said it.
Click to expand...

The concept of God that folk who believe out of fear have in their imaginations is so absurd that he is convinced he is right about God generally, since what God is seems to baffle both the religious and the atheist alike. The only god that exists only exists via connections made in the heart, and when one is so connected there is no doubt possible. This is knowing, this isn't faith. Faith and doubt are all forms of arrogance. The man of knowing knows he knows because he is connected to divinity within his being.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top