Hmm, Ornery..
Your views are quite interesting, if not somewhat puzzling, and mildly disturbing.
The main issue seems to be fuel consumption and therefor price and pollution. The size of our cars would be irrelivent if we had cheap, clean fuel to power them. We need alternatives to the poor quality fuel we are forced to use, gasoline.
I have to agree with
Finality. I'm not sure I can say I won't ever buy an American made car, and I'm not sure I would saye that all American made cars, passed, present and future are garbage, but my first one sure isn't going to be American. I can't think of an American vehicle, besides the classics of the 50s and 60s, I suppose.. that I would like to own.
We just don't seem to be able to build
cars that can go 200 - 300+ thousand miles. *shrug*
I take that back. We could build a car that could have an incredible life span, if we really wanted to. I guess we don't want to, though.
It's true what people say, [we] don't make things like [we] used to. It doesen't make sense, in our greed driven economy, to build things that last an extraordinary ammount of time.
On the other hand, countries like Japan seem to take pride in designing things so that they will last a long time.
May be a strange analogy, but I like to use lawnmowers as an example. Lawnmower engines of the 30s, 40s, and 50s were built like tanks. They weighed a lot, didn't develop much power, but they lasted forever. Many people (me.. lol) collect these antique engines. Many(Maybe even most) of them still run.
You're not going to find any throw away mowers in running condition in 60 years. Heh...
Briggs & Stratton has lost much of my respect as a small engine manufacturer. I'll still work to complete my collection of their antique engines; but if I was going to buy a brand new one.. It would be a Honda.