RIAA - Labels aim big guns at small file swappers.

GtPrOjEcTX

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
10,784
6
81
CNET article

By Lisa M. Bowman
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
June 25, 2003, 11:04 AM PT

In its most serious crackdown yet on file swapping, the Recording Industry Association of America said it will gather evidence against individuals who trade songs online and slap thousands of them with copyright-infringement lawsuits.

Bolstered by recent court rulings that make it easier to unmask individual file swappers, the music industry trade group said it will launch a massive campaign Thursday to target individuals who offer "substantial amounts" of music through peer-to-peer networks.

"Once we begin our evidence-gathering process, any individual computer user who continues to offer music illegally to millions of others will run the very real risk of facing legal action in the form of civil lawsuits that will cost violators thousands of dollars and potentially subject them to criminal prosecution," RIAA President Cary Sherman said in a statement.

The RIAA said it will scan the public directories of peer-to-peer networks to reveal files that people are sharing and detect their Internet service providers. The association will then serve subpoenas on the ISPs to identify the individuals. It expects the first round of suits to be filed as early as August.

The RIAA has stepped up its pursuit of file swappers in recent months, but this plan marks the largest effort yet to file lawsuits against people who actually trade music. In late April, the RIAA tapped into chat functions in file-trading tools Kazaa and Grokster to send messages to users warning them they're breaking the law.

Copyright attorney Mark Radcliffe said the decision to follow up on the legal threats isn't surprising, but that the RIAA is going to have to balance its pursuit of illegal traders with the possibility of alienating consumers.

"It's obviously a high-risk strategy, because you're suing your own customers," said Radcliffe, a partner at Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, which is based in Palo Alto, Calif.

The RIAA has also lined up nearly three dozen artists, including Missy Elliott, Shakira, Eve and the Dixie Chicks, to support its plans to sue music fans.

"We work really hard," Eve is quoted as saying in an RIAA release. "We love our fans and we appreciate the love, but don't steal from us, support us. Go in the stores and buy the records."

Until recently, the music industry focused its efforts on the creators of technology that allows people to trade files--including Napster, Scour and Aimster--not on the users themselves.

That strategy changed earlier this year, when the RIAA sued four university students it said ran services that searched computers connected to their college networks for MP3 song files. The students settled with the RIAA in May, with each agreeing to pay between $12,000 and $17,000.

This time around, the RIAA is not only pursuing suits against people who run mini-services, as the students did, but is also training its legal guns on those who actually trade the files. The RIAA said people who trade lots of files would potentially be the biggest targets, but there is no cut-off. Anyone who swaps unauthorized copies of songs could get snagged.

The RIAA's move was fueled in part by rulings in two separate cases that dealt with online music. In one case, a judge ruled in April that the makers of Grokster and Morpheus aren't liable for copyright infringing occurring as a result of people using their peer-to-peer software, leaving the labels little choice but to go after file swappers.

"It's one of the few strategies left," Radcliffe said.

In the second case, an appellate panel earlier this month ordered Verizon to turn over to the RIAA the names of people suspected of trading massive amounts of unauthorized files. This ruling will pave the way for copyright holders to more easily identify people who trade pirated files on peer-to-peer networks.

Independent music store owners, studio managers and a software anti-piracy group have also signed on to the RIAA's new legal efforts.

"P2P is an impressive technology, and nothing should make us lose sight of its potential," said Robert Holleyman, President and CEO of the Business Software Alliance, a trade group representing major software companies. "Yet, there are illegal uses of this technology that necessitate actions such as the strategy announced today by the RIAA."

---------------------

Cliff Notes: Basically since a judge ruled that the makers of Grokster and Morpheus can't be responsible for the illegal activity of their software, the RIAA has changed strategies to go directly after the individuals sharing the music. Browsing the software to see who's sharing, then getting their IP, then contacting the ISPs and serve subpoenas to them to identify the person. Then sue them.
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Can someone please just take out all the top music execs?

Maybe we should destroy their computers and see how they like it.
rolleye.gif
 

Heisenberg

Lifer
Dec 21, 2001
10,621
1
0
Man, they're just asking for it, aren't they? They won't be able to keep their servers up for more than a day before they get hax0red.
 

GtPrOjEcTX

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
10,784
6
81
Originally posted by: austin316
so is using kazaa no longer safe?
That's the conclusion I came to. But it says they are going after the ones that share it first...so if you're downloading it you may have some more time. (all speculation though)
 

Kaervak

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2001
8,460
2
81
Originally posted by: austin316
so is using kazaa no longer safe?

Pretty sure it is, they're only going after people who share files for now. That however will change.
 

m2kewl

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2001
8,263
0
0
fvck RIAA!! :|

tit-for-tat. someone's going to start encrypting/masking data and ip.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
All they need to do is counter sue the riaa. if the riaa is spamming on the networks, then they are not abiding by the terms of aggrement they accepted in the installation of the software.
 

GtPrOjEcTX

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
10,784
6
81
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
All they need to do is counter sue the riaa. if the riaa is spamming on the networks, then they are not abiding by the terms of aggrement they accepted in the installation of the software.
who is "they"? the individuals? or you talking about the software makers?
 

ComputerMonkey

Senior member
Sep 25, 2002
313
0
0
I don't see the probelm with this. The RIAA are finally going after the correct people (the major file swappers), not the system. I mean it is illegal after all. On the other hand they are suing their own customer base, which isn't good.
 

dxkj

Lifer
Feb 17, 2001
11,772
2
81
The part about turning over people who transfer large number of files is bs, Innocent until proven guilty. If they are simply pulling out high bandwidth users and examining what they transfer that is an infringement I would think..

But then again what do I know.


I think its funny that the people they will hurt the most with these lawsuits, are already poor college students and others who enjoy music and can't afford it.

The people who can afford it, will hurt a little but not nearly as much.
 

AznMaverick

Platinum Member
Apr 4, 2001
2,776
0
0
Originally posted by: dxkj
The part about turning over people who transfer large number of files is bs, Innocent until proven guilty. If they are simply pulling out high bandwidth users and examining what they transfer that is an infringement I would think..

But then again what do I know.


I think its funny that the people they will hurt the most with these lawsuits, are already poor college students and others who enjoy music and can't afford it.

The people who can afford it, will hurt a little but not nearly as much.


damn, that sucks for me. my younger bro uses tons of bandwidth to d/l pride fc, ufc, korean mvs, i myself d/l a ton of korean MVs, and dramas (using p2p, isp's newsgroup, and http). i hope that they don't get suspiscious about my internet usage. dammit...they are getting me all paranoid now.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Originally posted by: austin316
so is using kazaa no longer safe?

it is one of those things that is going to be nearly impossible to enforce. they will catch some here and their but it is like speeding. alot of people speed, some get caught others dont. what is the punishment if you are a small time file sharer?
 

amdskip

Lifer
Jan 6, 2001
22,530
13
81
I don't understand why artists are now supporting the tax wasting organization RIAA because will they see any of the money that comes from extra cds being sold, I don't think so. It's just a bunch of greedy musics execs that have nothing better to do. I'm not saying to go download songs right now but if the artists actually got what they deserve from selling cds and made the cds at a much more reasonable price, this would not be such a big deal. The facts are that they are never gonna stop file trading. They've already tried with napster and they failed.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: ComputerMonkey
I don't see the probelm with this. The RIAA are finally going after the correct people (the major file swappers), not the system. I mean it is illegal after all. On the other hand they are suing their own customer base, which isn't good.
I agree with you but yes, they are suing their own customer base. I predict that this will be a disastrous PR move for them. They may slow down file-sharing, but their sales will continue to go down as well.
 

crumpet19

Platinum Member
Feb 10, 2002
2,189
1
0
So what artists/labels are being represented by the RIAA? Any way to tell? I'd really like to start boycotting them even if this means just listening to local music.