RIAA: how low will they go?!?!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
There is no black/white decision on this one. As a criminal matter, I think it's the responsibility of the legal authorities to handle any sort of accusation, etc. The RIAA overstepped its bounds in approaching this man - they should have established reasonable proof that bootlegging or illegal CD trading was happening.

On the other hand, if they had proof that he was aware of, and ignoring, these activities, they should go to the police and let them decide the extent of his liability.
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,949
575
126
so according to your theory, every landlord that owns property should be punished for their tenants illegal activities whatever happened to punishing those who commit the crimes???I shouldn't be held responsible for the actions of others...liberal mentality @ its best
Well its not just a theory, its law.

If I rent you property, KNOWING that you're making meth there, and you're paying rent with the profits of your illegal activities, and I do nothing to stop it, yes I can and should be tossed in jail for FACILITATING a crime.

Its not holding you responsible for others' failings, it holding you responsible for your failings.
 

tm37

Lifer
Jan 24, 2001
12,436
1
0
Originally posted by: Zakath15
There is no black/white decision on this one. As a criminal matter, I think it's the responsibility of the legal authorities to handle any sort of accusation, etc. The RIAA overstepped its bounds in approaching this man - they should have established reasonable proof that bootlegging or illegal CD trading was happening.

On the other hand, if they had proof that he was aware of, and ignoring, these activities, they should go to the police and let them decide the extent of his liability.


I agree that he should ALSO face Criminal charges However they are well within their rights to sue just as they did napster.

There is a difference between CRIMINAL and CIVIL liability.


 

Ime

Diamond Member
May 3, 2001
3,661
0
76
I bought my last CD over 3 years ago. It's called a boycott. I also stopped listening to most "Pop" music, anyway.

I just listen to talk radio now.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
And this man knows they are selling bootleg CD's how? From some jerkoffs from the RIAA? Is he supposed to take the advice of every asswipe that walks into his office? I don't think so.

Edit: BTW, all you people defending the RIAA are making the assumption that this man knows of illegal activity. Well just because some dickbreath from the RIAA tells you something doesn't make it real.
 

transluko

Member
Sep 15, 2002
99
0
0
I hope the RIAA wins this case. It has to stop somewhere.

Should copying cd's end with free enjoyment of songs or letting scum profit off of others work.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: transluko
I hope the RIAA wins this case. It has to stop somewhere.

Should copying cd's end with free enjoyment of songs or letting scum profit off of others work.

Oh, you're so right. Why the next time I hum a song in my head I'll make sure and drop a check to the RIAA in the mail.
rolleye.gif
:disgust: :|