• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Revocation of medals adds insult to injuries

Analog

Lifer
Revocation of medals adds insult to injuries
Eleven Marines shamed by Purple Heart incident


The story of Marine Staff Sgt. Robert Arellano's wound is not exactly heroic. He was sitting in a tent in southern Iraq when the 9mm handgun he was repairing went off, sending a bullet through his left leg.

That's why his heart sank in spring 2003, when he heard that he would receive the Purple Heart as he recovered at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda.

Protests to superior officers were brushed aside.

"I told them I didn't think I deserved it," said Arellano, 38, of Oceanside, Calif. The thought of wearing a medal he didn't earn "was eating me alive."

Then a letter arrived two months ago making things even worse. The Purple Heart pinned on him nearly two years earlier had been "an administrative error" because his wound was not "caused directly or indirectly by enemy action." Ten other Marines who sustained noncombat injuries got the same news, from the office of the commandant of the Marine Corps.

'Slap in the face'
For a branch of the service that considers itself the most rigorous in the awarding of medals, such revocations are exceptionally rare, according to military historians and veterans. And for the 11 Marines, this was a final indignity added to the shattered bones, crushed intestines and broken teeth they suffered in a war zone.


Even worse, they said, in a culture in which careers are chronicled by decorations on uniforms, was the shame they felt at having worn the medals for almost two years.

"It was a slap in the face. The way it was handled was atrocious," said 1st Lt. Dustin Ferrell, who was badly injured when his Humvee crashed into an Army truck. Gen. William Nyland, assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, pinned the medal on his green hospital gown at the Bethesda medical center.

The Purple Heart, based on an award created by George Washington, is bestowed much more frequently than medals such as the Silver and Bronze stars, which are given for exceptional acts of heroism and are based on nominations. Purple Hearts are awarded to those who meet guidelines for having sustained injuries related to combat with enemy forces.

Rush to honor first casualties
Still, Cpl. Travis Eichelberger, 22, was featured on the local news and it seemed like everyone in his home town of Atchison, Kan., knew he had been awarded the medal. He even received the state-issued Purple Heart license plate when he bought his new GMC truck in 2003.

"When you wear it, people look at you and give you respect," said Eichelberger, still recovering from a broken pelvis and intestinal damage from being run over by an Abrams tank. "And now it's been taken away from us. What are we supposed to tell people? If they don't know the story, it makes us look as if we were lying."

The mistake grew out of confusion over the circumstances of the injuries, specifically the difference between wounds sustained in a combat zone and those caused by hostile action, said Charles Mugno, head of the Marine Corps Awards Branch. The injured Marines were among the first wave of casualties to return from Iraq, he said, and there was a rush to honor them.

Ferrell was injured in the first days of the war when his Humvee, racing through the desert at night to secure a bridge in Nasiriyah, crashed into an Army truck. The driver was killed and two others were severely injured.
 
I dont care if someone was shot, stabbed, paralyzed, killed, or whatever.. if it wasn't from direct enemy action they dont deserve a purple heart. The people that were happy about getting it shouldn't have. There is no grey area here.
 
Originally posted by: TallBill
I dont care if someone was shot, stabbed, paralyzed, killed, or whatever.. if it wasn't from direct enemy action they dont deserve a purple heart. The people that were happy about getting it shouldn't have. There is no grey area here.

does it really matter whether it was a friendly or enemy tank that ran you over... :disgust: you still got ran over by a friggen tank!
 
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
Originally posted by: TallBill
I dont care if someone was shot, stabbed, paralyzed, killed, or whatever.. if it wasn't from direct enemy action they dont deserve a purple heart. The people that were happy about getting it shouldn't have. There is no grey area here.

does it really matter whether it was a friendly or enemy tank that ran you over... :disgust: you still got ran over by a friggen tank!

Your obviously an idiot.. because yes it does matter. If it wasn't from direct enemy action, no purple heart is earned. Simple as that. I'll find the actual words for the medal if your still gonna be ignorant.
 
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
Originally posted by: TallBill
I dont care if someone was shot, stabbed, paralyzed, killed, or whatever.. if it wasn't from direct enemy action they dont deserve a purple heart. The people that were happy about getting it shouldn't have. There is no grey area here.

does it really matter whether it was a friendly or enemy tank that ran you over... :disgust: you still got ran over by a friggen tank!

Sweet... good thing nobody cares what you think.
 
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
Originally posted by: TallBill
I dont care if someone was shot, stabbed, paralyzed, killed, or whatever.. if it wasn't from direct enemy action they dont deserve a purple heart. The people that were happy about getting it shouldn't have. There is no grey area here.

does it really matter whether it was a friendly or enemy tank that ran you over... :disgust: you still got ran over by a friggen tank!

Your obviously an idiot.. because yes it does matter. If it wasn't from direct enemy action, no purple heart is earned. Simple as that. I'll find the actual words for the medal if your still gonna be ignorant.

well..i dont know much about the military, first off...even if they don't qualify for a purple heart, isnt there something that is awarded for being injured in a battle zone anyway?
 
Reporters tend to twist facts to say what they want to say, in this case making the USMC look like the bad guys. I doubt those Marines thought they deserved the purple hearts, but only one is mentioned as having said anything about it (I'm not saying the Marines did anything wrong, I just wonder how accurately the reporter is relating what took place). It's unfortunate that the mistake was made though. It's not like we have so many guys getting injured or killed that it's difficult to keep track of them.
 
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
Originally posted by: TallBill
I dont care if someone was shot, stabbed, paralyzed, killed, or whatever.. if it wasn't from direct enemy action they dont deserve a purple heart. The people that were happy about getting it shouldn't have. There is no grey area here.

does it really matter whether it was a friendly or enemy tank that ran you over... :disgust: you still got ran over by a friggen tank!

Your obviously an idiot.. because yes it does matter. If it wasn't from direct enemy action, no purple heart is earned. Simple as that. I'll find the actual words for the medal if your still gonna be ignorant.

*still waiting* IMO, the fact thay you enter a warzone is a big risk and that alone deserves recognition. Lots of unpredictable crap is going to happen in there. Friendly fire, enemy fire, civilian fire... whatever. I think saying "Yeah... I know you're risking your life out there and lots of crap will happen but the fact remains that the bullet came from friendly fire making you not worthy of recognition." is petty and an award should be given for injuries regardless of who's gun it came from.
 
Here are the rules, you asked for them.. they CLEARLY state that none of these guys should have recieved purples hearts.


AR 600-8-22 / 25 February 1995


SEC. 571. PURPLE HEART TO BE AWARDED ONLY TO MEMBERS OF
THE ARMED FORCES.


(a) IN GENERAL.--(1) Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

"§ 1131. Purple Heart: limitation to members of the armed forces

"The decoration known as the Purple Heart (authorized to be awarded pursuant to Executive Order 11016) may only be awarded to a person who is a member of the armed forces at the time the person is killed or wounded under circumstances otherwise qualifying that person for award of the Purple Heart.".

(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

"1131. Purple Heart: limitation to members of the armed forces.".

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.--Section 1131 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to persons who are killed or wounded after the end of the 180-day period beginning on (18 Nov 1997) the date of the enactment of this Act.



2-8. Purple Heart

The Purple Heart was established by General George Washington, at Newburgh, New York, on 7 August 1782, during the Revolutionary War. It was reestablished by the President of the United States per War Department General Orders 3, 1932 and is currently awarded pursuant to Executive Order 11016, 25 April 1962, Executive Order 12464, 23 February 1984 and Public Law 98-525, 19 October 1984.

a. The Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United States to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed, or who has died or may hereafter die after being wounded
(1) In any action against an enemy of the United States.

(2) In any action with an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States are or have been engaged.

(3) While serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

(4) As a result of an act of any such enemy of opposing armed forces.

(S) As the result of an act of any hostile foreign force.

(6) After 28 March 1973, as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States or a foreign nation friendly to the United States, recognized as such an attack by the Secretary of the Army, or jointly by the Secretaries of the separate armed Services concerned if persons from more than one service are wounded in the attack.

(7) After 28 March 1973, as a result of military operations while serving outside the territory of the United States as part of a peacekeeping force.

b. While clearly an individual decoration, the Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for the decoration; rather he or she is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria.

(1) A Purple Heart is authorized for the first wound suffered under conditions indicated above, but for each subsequent award an Oak Leaf Cluster will be awarded to be worn on the medal or ribbon. Not more than one award will be made for more than one wound or injury received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent.

(2) A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained under one or more of the conditions listed above A physical lesion is not required, however, the wound for which the award is made must have required treatment by a medical officer and records of medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record.

(3) When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.

(4) Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

(a) Injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action.

(b) Injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap.

(c) Injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological or nuclear agent.

(d) Injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire.

(e) Concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions.

(5) Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

(a) Frostbite or trench foot injuries.

(b) Heat stroke.

(c) Food poisoning not caused by enemy agents.

(d) Chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by the enemy.

(e) Battle fatigue.

(f) Disease not directly caused by enemy agents.

(g) Accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

(h) Self-inflicted wounds, except when in the heat of battle, and not involving gross negligence.

(i) Post traumatic stress disorders.

(j) Jump injuries not caused by enemy action.

(6) It is not intended that such a strict interpretation of the requirement for the wound or injury to be caused by direct result of hostile action be taken that it would preclude the award being made to deserving personnel. Commanders must also take into consideration, the circumstances surrounding an injury, even if it appears to meet the criteria. Note the following examples:

(a) In case such as an individual injured while making a parachute landing from an aircraft that had been brought down enemy fire; or, an individual injured as a result of a vehicle accident caused by enemy fire, the decision will be made in favor of the individual and the award will be made.

(b) Individuals wounded or killed as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" will be awarded the Purple Heart as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.

(c) Individuals injured as a result of their own negligence; for example, driving or walking through an unauthorized area known to have been mined or placed off limits or searching for or picking up unexploded munitions as war souvenirs, will not be awarded the Purple Heart as they clearly were not injured as a result of enemy action, but rather by their own negligence.

c. A Purple Heart will be issued to the next of kin of each person entitled to a posthumous award. Issue will be made automatically by the Commanding General, PERSCOM, upon receiving a report of death indicating entitlement.

d. Upon written application to Commander, ARPERCEN, ATIN.- DAR-P-VSEA, 9700 Page Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63132-5200, award may be made to any member of the Army, who during World War 1, was awarded a Meritorious Service Citation Certificate signed by the Commander in Chief, American Expeditionary Forces, or who was authorized to wear wound chevrons. Posthumous awards to personnel who were killed or died of wounds after 5 April 1917 will be made to the appropriate next of kin upon application to the Commanding General, PERSCOM.

e. Any member of the Army who was awarded the Purple Heart for meritorious achievement or service, as opposed to wounds received in action, between 7 December 1941 and 22 September 1943, may apply for award of an appropriate decoration instead of the Purple Heart.

f. For those who became Prisoners of War after 25 April 1962, the Purple Heart will be awarded to individuals wounded while prisoners of foreign forces, upon submission by the individual to the Department of the U.S. Army of an affidavit that is supported by a statement from a witness, if this is possible. Documentation and inquiries Should be directed to Commander, PERSCOM, ATTN: TAPCPDA, Alexandria, VA 22332-0471.

g. Any member of the U.S. Army who believes that he or she is eligible for the Purple Heart, but through unusual circumstances no award was made, may submit an application through military channels, to Commander, PERSCOM, ATTN: TAPC-PDA, Alexandria, VA 22332-0471. Application will include complete documentation, to include evidence of medical treatment, pertaining to the wound.



PUBLIC LAW 104-106 - FEB. 10, 1996


SEC. 621. AWARD OF PURPLE HEART TO PERSONS WOUNDED WHILE HELD AS PRISONERS OF WAR BEFORE APRIL 2G, 1962.

(a) AWARD OF PURPLE HEART.?For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United States Code) shall treat a former prisoner of war who was wounded before April 25, 1962, while held as a prisoner of war (or while being taken captive) in the same manner as a former prisoner of war who is wounded on or after that date while held as a prisoner of war (or while being taken captive).
(b) STANDARDS FOR AWARD.?An award of the Purple Heart under subsection (a) shall be made in accordance with the standards in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act for the award of the Purple Heart to persons wounded on or after April 25, 1962.

(C) ELIGIBLE FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR.?A person shall be considered to be a former prisoner of war for purposes of this section if the person is eligible for the prisoner-of-war meda1 under section 1128 of title 10, United States Code.



 
Heres the first no brainer indicator.

(5) Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

...

(g) Accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

 
Originally posted by: TallBill
Heres the first no brainer indicator.

(5) Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

...

(g) Accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

Hmm... very interesting. So the person in the article definitely did not deserve the purple heart. On the other hand, John Kerry got it under this stipulation?

(b) Individuals wounded or killed as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" will be awarded the Purple Heart as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.
 
My 2 cents- Purple Heart is as TallBill said. Enemy action. However, if a medal was mistakenly awarded, don't take it away after the fact.
 
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Hmm... very interesting. So the person in the article definitely did not deserve the purple heart. On the other hand, John Kerry got it under this stipulation?

(b) Individuals wounded or killed as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" will be awarded the Purple Heart as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.

sounds like it.
 
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
My 2 cents- Purple Heart is as TallBill said. Enemy action. However, if a medal was mistakenly awarded, don't take it away after the fact.

I tend to agree. People routinely get undeserved medals just by being in the right place at the right time, and friends of mine have received Bronze Stars just by spending 4 months in a steady-state, non-combat environment that happens to be in the Middle East. I don't really see that it helps anyone to take away medals like these, particularly where the recipient is seriously injured.
 
Back
Top