returned E-mail that I didnt send...

somethingwitty

Golden Member
Aug 1, 2000
1,420
1
0
got a returned mail today on something I never sent. I doubt anyone has access to my account, and it's more likely (i assume) that someone harvested my email address or something. I'm not great at reading headers, so below is a copy (of portions) of the return I recieved; I've put parts of it that I suspect are relevant in Bold-if anyone has any advice I'd appreciate it. thanks

Return-Path:
<>
Received:
from nref.com (nref.com [161.58.207.44]) by home.seas.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12388 for <MYACCOUNT@seas.upenn.edu>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:43:38 -0500 (EST)
Received:
(localhost) by nref.com (8.11.6) id g25MhWw17420; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:32 -0700 (MST)
Date:
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:32 -0700 (MST)
From:
MAILER-DAEMON@nref.com (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Content-Type:
multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="g25MhWw17420.1015368212/nref.com"
Auto-Submitted:
auto-generated (failure)
X-Mozilla-Status:
8001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
X-UIDL:
2a6cf868407bc063430853e1a80dc95d

The original message was received at Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:30 -0700 (MST)
from root@sierra.seas.upenn.edu [158.130.64.180]

----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
"|/usr/bin/autoreply -f info-reply -m /etc/info_reply -a info"
expanded from: <info@internetmattress.com>

Reporting-MTA: dns; nref.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; sierra.seas.upenn.edu
Arrival-Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:30 -0700 (MST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; info@internetmattress.com
Action: expanded (to multi-recipient alias)
Status: 2.0.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:32 -0700 (MST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; info@internetmattress.com
X-Actual-Recipient: rfc822; |/usr/bin/autoreply -f info-reply -m /etc/info_reply -a info@nref.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:31 -0700 (MST)


Return-Path:
MYACCOUNT@seas.upenn.edu
Received:
from sierra.seas.upenn.edu (root@sierra.seas.upenn.edu [158.130.64.180]) by nref.com (8.11.6) id g25MhUw17419; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:43:30 -0700 (MST)
Received:
from Zllz (dsl092-239-167.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.239.167]) by sierra.seas.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA24981 for <info@internetmattress.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:43:24 (relevant?)
-0500 (EST)
Date:
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:43:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID:
<200203052243.RAA24981@sierra.seas.upenn.edu>
From:
ME <ME@seas.upenn.edu>
To:
info@internetmattress.com
Subject:
[something sexual-we'll leave it at that :)]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary=U629JLSJ6OT0043CH311p41yP8q6


again, any help would be great. I'm sure nothing legal can be done-but it'd be nice to understand what this means...
 

Jokeram

Golden Member
May 9, 2001
1,202
0
0
the only thing that I was able to get out of it was that it was the senders IP 158.130.64.180 so if you guys use static IPs you can trace the person down.. if its DHCP your administrator might be able to help you.

whatever it was this is what the site contains.... maybe someone was pissed off at them (and you) and sent them a mail but used your address.. you can always change the senders email add. using an email client (thats the easiest but most traceble way).


INTERNET MATTRESS IS TEMPORARILY OFFLINE.
WE ARE RE-ORGANIZING TO SERVE YOU BETTER.

WE ARE IN DESPERATE NEED OF DISTRIBUTORS ACROSS THE UNTIED STATES!

IF YOU ARE A MANUFACTURER OR RETAILER INTERESTED IN OUR DISTRIBUTOR PROGRAM, ESPECIALLY IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS, PLEASE CONTACT US:

CHICAGO
NEW YORK CITY
MIAMI
LA
SAN FRANCISCO
UPSTATE NEW YORK
 

somethingwitty

Golden Member
Aug 1, 2000
1,420
1
0


<<
Received:
from Zllz (dsl092-239-167.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.239.167]) by sierra.seas.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA24981 for <info@internetmattress.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:43:24 (relevant?)
-0500 (EST)
>>



Would this be relevant in some way too? thanks for the help so far.
 

Jokeram

Golden Member
May 9, 2001
1,202
0
0
I believe that is just the start of path that was followed on the bounce back.. I might be wrong but I think it is irrelavant..