Looks at desk.... .38 Taurus.There is a small difference between armed robbery and breaching a financial contract.
Here's a fun experiment for you to try. Visit a loan officer tomorrow, ask for a loan, and during the application process lay a firearm down on the table.
Report back with your results.
Had a customer tell me that she didn't pay because my $$ was "a financial blessing from God." Great. I'll let my family know.Yes, I carefully plan my bankruptcies once every few years.
If you're assuming that all unpaid debt was borrowed with no ability or intention to repay, then what we're talking about is most closely similar to fraud as opposed to theft.
If becoming insolvent (for any reason) means you go to jail, the debts will still never be paid but there will be many expensive prisons to run. So what is the purpose of the jail time?
It's on the lender if they didn't do their homework. We have credit reporting agencies for a reason. If you're stupid enough to loan money without doing your due diligence, you won't be in the lending business for very long.The ones I'm referring to are the ones that never intend on repaying.
LOLOLOLIt's on the lender if they didn't do their homework. We have credit reporting agencies for a reason. If you're stupid enough to loan money without doing your due diligence, you won't be in the lending business for very long.
ok, replace 'theft' with 'breach of contract' in my original post. you get your semantic victory, my point remains unchanged.It's not theft. If you don't want to lose money as a lender, don't lend money.
Otherwise lending money is like any other financial risk we take. We hope the gains outweigh the losses. If lending money wasn't profitable, banks wouldn't exist.
ok, replace 'theft' with 'breach of contract' in my original post. you get your semantic victory, my point remains unchanged.
my preferred punishment for [breach of contract] is reparation + penalty. since these people are not abiding by that punishment, jail seems like the next logical step.
no, as is clearly stated in my post, people should be responsible for repayment and penalty for breaching contract.So you really want to say this:
You think people should go to jail for breach of contract? You're going to need to build a lot of jails.
no, as is clearly stated in my post, people should be responsible for repayment and penalty for breaching contract.
when the repayment and penalty is not met, THEN jail.
would you prefer just a sincere apology?
Who wins if we go with your plan?
Perhaps, if the end of the road is jail/prison, people will not, in the first place, so easily incur debts they cannot possibly repay.
If that happens, then everyone wins and no one goes behind bars.
MotionMan
What about corporations that borrow? What should the consequences be for them?
How do you intend to separate those who took on debt they could not afford / did not plan to repay?Perhaps, if the end of the road is jail/prison, people will not, in the first place, so easily incur debts they cannot possibly repay.
If that happens, then everyone wins and no one goes behind bars.
MotionMan
That is a totally different subject. Any suggestions?
MotionMan
How do you intend to separate those who took on debt they could not afford / did not plan to repay?
Or should losing your job now be punishable by prison?
I'm not arguing that debt shouldn't be paid, I just fail to see how sending the insolvent to prison would help.
Whoever signed for the debt, every person who is higher on the org chart (or who makes more money), and every owner can go to debtor's prison![]()
Too bad they are above the law.
Try again?
4-24-2012
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blo...ing-1-cup-002830215--abc-news-topstories.html
Florida Man Charged With Felony for Allegedly Stealing $1 Cup of Soda From McDonald's
A Florida man was arrested and held on $6,500 bond after police in Collier County said he left a McDonald's without paying for a cup of soda valued at $1.
Mark Abaire, 52, had apparently asked staff at the Naples restaurant for a courtesy cup of water, but instead he allegedly filled the cup with soda from the soda fountain.
Abaire could face five years in prison if he is convicted of the felony.
easy to suspect, harder to proveCheck the financials and history. Pretty easy to figure out actually.
No. See above.
SENDING them to prison does not solve it. The THREAT of being sent to prison should help.
Sending someone to prison for a crime does not prevent crime. The threat of going to prison is the deterrent (at least in theory).
MotionMan
easy to suspect, harder to prove
Sounds expensive. But I think the correct action is fraud charges, or similar, if you can prove deception and/or intent, rather than prison for unpaid debt.
That doesn't happen.