Resistance against the banning of Ltk007.

Sephiroth_IX

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 1999
5,933
0
0
The Banning Thread.

LTK007 was banned for using the forbidden words InBTL (In Before the Lock). If you did not know, InBTL was made forbidden because a while back, everyone simply put InBTL in nef/soon to be locked threads. Also, in the former spelling, there was no "n." I had to add one or the filter would not allow me to post.

To me, it seems unfair that he was banned for this action. I would understand a temporary banning, a suspension if you will, but this banning looks as if it is here to stay. Yes, Ltk007 got around the language filter. Yes he used it in a post. This is not a reason to ban him forever.

My main problem with this entire problem, however, is the fact that he actully posted a comment before he put InBTL. Now-a-days, people don't put "InBTL," but rather a simple "This will be locked soon." There is no difference between the two statements. In dozens of other threads, people use the latter of the two statements, with absolutely no other comment in their post. Evan (ltk007) posted a comment, and then simply added InBTL as a afterthought, yet he is banned and noone else even got a slap on the wrist.


I find this unfair to Evan, and he should permitted to post. He has had his punishment. He has learned his lesson. Why take it any further?

<edit> Well, lets see. I guess i should have made this a poll. 100% of the people said Evan should be readmitted, with 14 votes counted before the polls were closed. </edit>

Sephiroth_IX,

DO NOT edit this out again. You know full well that he was NOT banned for the initials. He was banned for demonstrating how to defeat the language filters. He has already been contacted.

Drop it.

AnandTech Moderator


Moderator - I never edited this out. If i did, it was completely by accident, although i am sure i would notice having erased several lines of text. Especially when i came in after the lock to look for your explanation. I'll drop it, but when did he demonstrate how to defeat the language filters? Was it by posting that? I see all kinds of posts that defeat the filter already, and they arent banned...
 

Kyle

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 1999
4,145
11
91
I think the MOD's might be a bit too touchy...getting banned for that seems like over reacting...
 

DAM

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
6,102
1
76
ya another vote for ltk to be reinstated to the ranks.







dam(|BTL)
 

Yeeny

Lifer
Feb 2, 2000
10,848
2
0
I may be a tad partial to Evan, but this really was not totally fair. While that is a banned term, others have said it without getting banned, the most I have seen given out is a warning. So please let him come back.
 

Isla

Elite member
Sep 12, 2000
7,749
2
0
I am SO confused.

First of all, I have said &quot;In before the lock&quot; in the past two weeks... Is that a no-no? Does that mean I had better not do it again? (edit: I have to say, I had NO idea that was forbidden. Very curious indeed.)

Second of all, Evan is a WONDERFUL person, very mature (for his age), intelligent, polite, etc.

Mods, have mercy!
 

DAM

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
6,102
1
76
i think the mod(s) were going through some rough times, they banned a couple of ppl, however of those ppl banned there was only one person that trully deserved it, and i hope it permanent too.








dam(dont call me bitter)
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
methinks the mod had an itchy banning finger that night. let the poor dude back in :)