Researchers Prove Bible Grossly Mistranslated

Duder1no

Senior member
Nov 1, 2010
866
1
0
OOPS LOL!!!


A research group in Canada, has proven that the Old Testament has been massively mistranslated.

This follows three years of research, which have uncovered the actual system for translating ancient Hebrew.

The group discovered that each letter is not a letter at all, but a full word, and what was believed to be a word, is actually a sentence like description, which supplies the definition of the word. With this discovery, each word can now be properly defined and the results are astounding.

This means a word can no longer be disputed and swayed by doctrinal pressures

If accurate, the findings will rewrite everything we presently believe about the scriptual beginnings of the Earth.

Research Head Christopher Tyreman states that what they have found, proves without a doubt, that the Bible has been grossly mistranslated and that their findings expose this fact with glaring simplicity. He further stated that he finds it interesting that a group of lay researchers were able to see and assemble what they call "Self Defining Hebrew or the SDH System" while experts seemed unaware of its existence.

The team also wished people to understand that this is not a bible code, but the system the original language was built on.

Its construct shows it to be a manufactured system of massive complexity, using only twenty two words, which when mixed, can supply a complete language.

Mr. Tyreman also added that the form of this language shows it could not have evolved from surrounding cultures as it is incapable of importing words from outside language. This alone points to an origination outside of the scope of the presently held theories of language development. These findings could have a major impact on how Science and religion look at our beginnings.

The research team has posted all of its work online @ www.thechronicleproject.org


Researchers Prove Bible Grossly Mistranslated - CNN iReport
 
Last edited:

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
Where can we get an SDH Bible?
You know they already have a converter developed and the originals in digital form.

Now we just need a discovery like this for the translation of the second amendment.

BTW, nice pic of 4 Elviras and 2 Ricky Gervaises. Definitely looks legit.
 
Last edited:

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
The New Testament (The Jesus Section) was written in Greek, so it is still good to go.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Some one is going to get into a panic over such.

Their reputations have been built around such translations. To show that they are wrong in the slightest will be an affront.

It will be interesting tosee what this group comes out with.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
I've known that and if it were translated properly, there wouldn't be so many atheists. A lot of atheists use mistranslations to try to prove that God doesn't exist.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
It really IS amazing that a group of non-expert laypersons achieved such an astounding finding after millenia of study by tens of thousands of scholars, including those fluent in ancient Hebrew. Or, you can accept that experts who spend their lives learning ancient Hebrew and writing entire dissertations on a single line (or, more often, a single word) in the Old Testament. This is equivalent to some nutjob claiming that Plato's works have been mistranslated all along, then trying to ascribe some completely new meaning to what he wrote.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
v1. To chronicle to begin to
produce, the supreme ones,
with the celestials and with the
planet Earth.
v2. And the Planet Earth had
existed for a long time,
without attention and amid
being to note.
And darkness upon, to face the
salt water ocean. And to draw
in (from an outside source),
the supreme ones, air upon
(the) face of the that water.
v3. And so to declare the
supreme ones, &#8220;So to exist to
illuminate&#8221;
And so to exist to illuminate.
v4. And so to perceive the
supreme ones, with the to
illuminate...
 

D1gger

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
5,411
2
76
I've known that and if it were translated properly, there wouldn't be so many atheists. A lot of atheists use mistranslations to try to prove that God doesn't exist.

It makes no difference how you translate a fairytale, it is still a fairytale. It can prove or disprove nothing.
 

Ape

Golden Member
Jul 29, 2000
1,088
0
71
It makes no difference how you translate a fairytale, it is still a fairytale. It can prove or disprove nothing.

lol

I love it when people who don't understand faith stoop to calling the bible airytales.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Anybody else try to read any of that? (beside PC Surgeon)?

Their translation needs a translation. It looks awfully close to jibberish.

Fern
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,535
3
0
OOPS LOL!!!


A research group in Canada, has proven that the Old Testament has been massively mistranslated.

This follows three years of research, which have uncovered the actual system for translating ancient Hebrew.

The group discovered that each letter is not a letter at all, but a full word, and what was believed to be a word, is actually a sentence like description, which supplies the definition of the word. With this discovery, each word can now be properly defined and the results are astounding.

This means a word can no longer be disputed and swayed by doctrinal pressures

If accurate, the findings will rewrite everything we presently believe about the scriptual beginnings of the Earth.

Research Head Christopher Tyreman states that what they have found, proves without a doubt, that the Bible has been grossly mistranslated and that their findings expose this fact with glaring simplicity. He further stated that he finds it interesting that a group of lay researchers were able to see and assemble what they call "Self Defining Hebrew or the SDH System" while experts seemed unaware of its existence.

The team also wished people to understand that this is not a bible code, but the system the original language was built on.

Its construct shows it to be a manufactured system of massive complexity, using only twenty two words, which when mixed, can supply a complete language.

Mr. Tyreman also added that the form of this language shows it could not have evolved from surrounding cultures as it is incapable of importing words from outside language. This alone points to an origination outside of the scope of the presently held theories of language development. These findings could have a major impact on how Science and religion look at our beginnings.

The research team has posted all of its work online @ www.thechronicleproject.org


Researchers Prove Bible Grossly Mistranslated - CNN iReport

I'm not a Christian.

The article is BS, the research is BS. There have been entire generations of people dedicated to these translations who have spent a lot more than 3 years of off time doing it

The translations are correct... they were correct 1000, 2000 years ago when they were made.

Does that make the Bible true? Not in my opinion but accurate to the original? Yes.
 
Last edited:

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
lol

I love it when people who don't understand faith stoop to calling the bible airytales.

I understand faith. I just don't have any. If I ran a bookstore religious texts would go right in with the rest of the fiction.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
The Quran is only one from author and still 100&#37; original Arabic unchanged.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
v1. To chronicle to begin to
produce, the supreme ones,
with the celestials and with the
planet Earth.
v2. And the Planet Earth had
existed for a long time,
without attention and amid
being to note.
And darkness upon, to face the
salt water ocean. And to draw
in (from an outside source),
the supreme ones, air upon
(the) face of the that water.
v3. And so to declare the
supreme ones, “So to exist to
illuminate”
And so to exist to illuminate.
v4. And so to perceive the
supreme ones, with the to
illuminate...

If you scroll down to page 17 they give a translation of that jibberish...

v1 To chronicle the beginning of the supreme ones production with our celestials
and with the planet Earth.
v2 And the planet Earth had existed for a long time without attention and being of
note.
And darkness covered the salt water ocean. And the supreme ones drew (in from an
outside source) air over the face of that water.
v3 And so declared the supreme ones,"Let that which illuminates exist and that
which illuminates occurred.
v4 And the supreme ones perceived with that which illuminates and as so were
satisfied with the results.
And with this action the supreme ones separated between that which illuminates and
the darkness.
v5 And the supreme ones named that which illuminates,"to arise" and to darkness
called by the name,"to carry away". And so existed sunset and then sunrise and
these two times are now united to be known as "The Day to Unite".

VS the current version...

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

I dunno... doesn't look like they uncovered anything really. I haven't read the whole thing and I'm not going to but other than 'supreme beings' which will set the UFO nuts ablaze with new theories it seems to track right along with the KJV.

Honestly it reads about the same as I'd expect if Congress wrote the bible.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,621
6,178
126
If you scroll down to page 17 they give a translation of that jibberish...



VS the current version...



I dunno... doesn't look like they uncovered anything really. I haven't read the whole thing and I'm not going to but other than 'supreme beings' which will set the UFO nuts ablaze with new theories it seems to track right along with the KJV.

Honestly it reads about the same as I'd expect if Congress wrote the bible.

"Supreme ones" sounds rather iffy as "God".
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
"Supreme ones" sounds rather iffy as "God".

600full.jpg


Or

chicken-supreme-culinary-school-of-rockies.jpg
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
As a multilingual person, I'm still amazed that people dedicate their lives to particular translation of the text. Get 10 different ancient-hebrew speakers to translate and you end up with 10 different english texts.
 

MooseNSquirrel

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2009
2,587
318
126
I've known that and if it were translated properly, there wouldn't be so many atheists. A lot of atheists use mistranslations to try to prove that God doesn't exist.

Of course!

If only the Bible had been properly translated I too would believe in fluffy invisible pink unicorns.