• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Required insurance law sets standard..Thursday, April 13, 2006

IGBT

Lifer
Text

BOSTON, Massachusetts (AP) -- By next summer, Massachusetts may cross a threshold that has eluded presidents, governors and other political leaders for generations by becoming the first state to require universal health care coverage.

Massachusetts took a major step toward that accomplishment Wednesday when Gov. Mitt Romney signed legislation designed to guarantee coverage for virtually all residents by July 2007, including an estimated 550,000 people who are now uninsured.

The law has set a standard for other states and thrust Massachusetts to the forefront of the national debate about how to dramatically expand health care coverage without creating a single government-controlled system.

Even as he signed the law amid fanfare at historic Faneuil Hall, Romney faced criticism for vetoing a key portion of the legislation: a $295 per employee annual fee on businesses that do not provide their employees with coverage.

The law also provides subsidies and sliding-scale premiums to get poor and low-income residents into health plans and require those deemed able to afford insurance to purchase a policy.

"We have found a way, collectively, to get all of our citizens insurance without some new government-mandated takeover or a huge new tax program," Romney said.

Romney is weighing a potential run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008 and the law could be a centerpiece of that campaign.
 
How can they say there's no new tax program, when the state is going to subsidize the costs for some people?
 
Originally posted by: kranky
How can they say there's no new tax program, when the state is going to subsidize the costs for some people?

..they'll create a new "fee" of some sort to cover it.

 

I don't think this is the best idea, but I'm glad some state is at least trying it.

We should know in a few years how this works out-- and whether there is any truth to the fear that mandated health insurance will lead to an increase in overall health care expenditures or a decrease in quality...
 
Back
Top