• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Request to Unlock thread, "Obama already canonized..." at P&N


I disagree with the rationale given by Common Courtesy for closing this thread:

http://forums.anandtech.com/me...id=52&threadid=2268732

Give the new guy a chance to show what he is going to do; similar to the 100 days that previous presidents & congress have used to shine/fail.

Then if needed, post this thread. At that time, there will be comething to measure against.

I think that Common Courtesy may have misinterpreted the subject matter of the thread, perhaps thinking that it was another anti-Obama thread (what's wrong with those anyway?--it is the P&N forum).

The core subject matter of the thread was not about how or whether Obama will be a horrible president (I voted for the guy), but rather whether people are being overly optimistic about him to the point of irrationality--whether all of the enthusiasm surrounding the inauguration is misplaced and whether or not people are prematurely optimistic and failing their civic duty of giving him the very skeptical examination that all politicians deserve.

I've more or less read the entire thread and haven't found anything particularly objectionable, and I don't see any reason why the subject matter of that thread was inappropriate. In fact, it's actually very timely and on point.
 
Your comments

What I find very bothersome is that it almost seems as though many Americans are giving him a blank check instead of keeping a skeptical eye on him, which we should do for all politicians.

Obama lovers are going to be in for a huge letdown when they finally realize that he's just a normal politician and that he really won't fix our problems and might even make things a little worse.

You have the ones that put him on a pedestal and those that wish to tear into him because he won.

As stated in the comments, prejudging him from either POV is wrong.

You are challenging the supporters for building up expectations. There have been plenty of other threads over the past 2-3 months on the subject. Let him prove himself and then jump on him for what he has done.


Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
So I guess we should change the name of that forum from "Politics and News" to just "News"?
Knock yourself out.

Truth hurts?

I laugh in the face of the people who think they can control what I think. 😛

EDIT:

or say.
 
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
So I guess we should change the name of that forum from "Politics and News" to just "News"?
Knock yourself out.

Truth hurts?

I laugh in the face of the people who think they can control what I think. 😛

EDIT:

or say.
Actually I am saying for you to go ahead and change the name. Get back to me when you are done.

 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
So I guess we should change the name of that forum from "Politics and News" to just "News"?
Knock yourself out.

Truth hurts?

I laugh in the face of the people who think they can control what I think. 😛

EDIT:

or say.
Actually I am saying for you to go ahead and change the name. Get back to me when you are done.

Actually I think you're just attempting to be a smart ass, but failed if you feel you have to explain it to me.

The point is Whippersnappers thread is perfectly fine for a forum named POLITICS & News. Discussing the "what ifs" is what politics is all about.

 
What ifs are fine.

Multiple threads on the what if are not.
Trying to troll before the starting pistol has fired is not.


Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy
 
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
What ifs are fine.

Multiple threads on the what if are not.
Trying to troll before the starting pistol has fired is not.


Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy

I didn't see anything wrong with the thread. It was a little trollish but most threads in P&N are. He does have a point about getting a pass from the press IMO.

I started my own thread about Obama, I hope it passes the smell test. 🙂

What we don't know about Obama
 
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
What ifs are fine.

Multiple threads on the what if are not.
Trying to troll before the starting pistol has fired is not.


Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy

I didn't see anything wrong with the thread. It was a little trollish but most threads in P&N are. He does have a point about getting a pass from the press IMO.

I started my own thread about Obama, I hope it passes the smell test. 🙂

What we don't know about Obama

Let me help you:
nobodyknows' thread
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
What ifs are fine.

Multiple threads on the what if are not.
Trying to troll before the starting pistol has fired is not.


Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy

I didn't see anything wrong with the thread. It was a little trollish but most threads in P&N are. He does have a point about getting a pass from the press IMO.

I started my own thread about Obama, I hope it passes the smell test. 🙂

What we don't know about Obama

Let me help you:
nobodyknows' thread

That's a good thread, much better than the OP's

Speaking as a Member.
 
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Thanks for linking me up Olds. How did I mess that up??

And thank you for the compliment Red. 🙂 I try.

WWYBYWB?

Gee, baseless personal insults for the win!! What a classy guy you are.

Who were you before you thought you were better then everybody?
 
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Thanks for linking me up Olds. How did I mess that up??

And thank you for the compliment Red. 🙂 I try.

WWYBYWB?

Gee, baseless personal insults for the win!! What a classy guy you are.

Who were you before you thought you were better then everybody?

How is that an insult?
 
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Thanks for linking me up Olds. How did I mess that up??

And thank you for the compliment Red. 🙂 I try.

WWYBYWB?

Gee, baseless personal insults for the win!! What a classy guy you are.

Who were you before you thought you were better then everybody?

How is that an insult?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insults

An insult (also called putdown) is an expression, statement (or sometimes behavior) which is considered degrading. Insults may be intentional or accidental. An example of the latter is a well-intended simple explanation, which in fact is superfluous, but is given due to underestimating the intelligence or knowledge of the other; a practice which is also called flouting

Enlighten me. How was it not an insult?
 
bsobel's statement was legitimate. You do stand out.
1. Cryptic name. (PBM sometimes try to be sly about their new name)
2. Posting in FI as a noob. (Most noobs don't post about forum issues unless they are technical in nature)
3. Called me Olds and Red Dawn, Red. (Familiarity)
3. You know what WWYBYWB means. (While it is used on other forums, most people outside of here don't know what it means.

Members come back, even spammers come back.
While it's possible that you are new here, it just as possible that you are a RBM using a new ISP or a proxy. Because of your defensiveness, I lean to the latter.
Now, put on some thicker skin (you will need it here) and enjoy the forums.

 
Im just trying to remember who was banned from either North or South Dakota recently...
 
Originally posted by: bsobel
Im just trying to remember who was banned from either North or South Dakota recently...

Notes. You have to keep your own notes. I kept a word doc on my desktop to add notes as needed. Problem, you don't always get every detail.
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
bsobel's statement was legitimate. You do stand out.
1. Cryptic name. (PBM sometimes try to be sly about their new name)
2. Posting in FI as a noob. (Most noobs don't post about forum issues unless they are technical in nature)
3. Called me Olds and Red Dawn, Red. (Familiarity)
3. You know what WWYBYWB means. (While it is used on other forums, most people outside of here don't know what it means.

Members come back, even spammers come back.
While it's possible that you are new here, it just as possible that you are a RBM using a new ISP or a proxy. Because of your defensiveness, I lean to the latter.
Now, put on some thicker skin (you will need it here) and enjoy the forums.

They do call you Olds and Red Dawn, Red for short, right? That's being "too familar"? That's kind of funny. What do you think I am, some 12 year kid who doesn't even shave yet?

Is it some kind of power/ego trip to catch someone who is trying to slip back after being banned. Do you get "bonus points" for that or is it thaT bsobel just doesn't like me? Perhaps because he disagrees with some of my positions in P&N? Like my critic in thread?

I don't know what his problem is beyond being on an ego trip, but it's no reason to come into this thread and needlessly attack me. I've done nothing wrong so bite me bs.

 
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
bsobel's statement was legitimate. You do stand out.
1. Cryptic name. (PBM sometimes try to be sly about their new name)
2. Posting in FI as a noob. (Most noobs don't post about forum issues unless they are technical in nature)
3. Called me Olds and Red Dawn, Red. (Familiarity)
3. You know what WWYBYWB means. (While it is used on other forums, most people outside of here don't know what it means.

Members come back, even spammers come back.
While it's possible that you are new here, it just as possible that you are a RBM using a new ISP or a proxy. Because of your defensiveness, I lean to the latter.
Now, put on some thicker skin (you will need it here) and enjoy the forums.

They do call you Olds and Red Dawn, Red for short, right? That's being "too familar"? That's kind of funny. What do you think I am, some 12 year kid who doesn't even shave yet?

Is it some kind of power/ego trip to catch someone who is trying to slip back after being banned. Do you get "bonus points" for that or is it thaT bsobel just doesn't like me? Perhaps because he disagrees with some of my positions in P&N? Like my critic in thread?

I don't know what his problem is beyond being on an ego trip, but it's no reason to come into this thread and needlessly attack me. I've done nothing wrong so bite me bs.

Ok seriously, WWYBYWB?
 
Nobodyknows wasn't attacked, the OP's concern was addressed and this thread has gone off track, so it's over.

moderator allisolm
 
Back
Top