My desktop has 1 40GB HD with XP pro installed, after I back up some stuff to DVD I'll have about 23 GIG free.
I've never partitioned an HD before, but I have Acronis PartitionExpert. But I'm wondering- what's the concencus on what size you should set your partitions? For example, I sometimes see people setting 10 GB for the main OS on c:\, and the rest for data partition on d:
Whether that's ideal or low or overkill I don't know, so that's why I'm asking what the concensus is.
I also have an 80GB laptop with Win2k (only) that I may wish to partition.
My reasons for partitioning:
1) data is said to be safer on seperate partition
2) I'm interested in making a drive image, the software I own (acronis true image personal edition), will either back up the whole drive or a partition. This personal edition doesn't seem to have the function to deselect files on a drive/partition, so if I move all my data off to a seperate partition, it should be faster and take up alot fewer DVDRs to back up my OS partition.
I may be interested in installing linux (never done before). Let's say I make a partition into c: and d:
If i later make a partition for e: and install for example, Ubuntu, that would be OK? That would be good for my laptop, though for the desktop I might just install Ubuntu on a spare 2.5GB slave HD (assuming it'll fit, XP certainly does on that size). It's an experiment to get used to linux.
And if I want both 2k/xp and Linux to both be able to access a data partition (for example mp3's), what file system should the data partition use? I've heard NTFS has problems with Linux...
I've never partitioned an HD before, but I have Acronis PartitionExpert. But I'm wondering- what's the concencus on what size you should set your partitions? For example, I sometimes see people setting 10 GB for the main OS on c:\, and the rest for data partition on d:
Whether that's ideal or low or overkill I don't know, so that's why I'm asking what the concensus is.
I also have an 80GB laptop with Win2k (only) that I may wish to partition.
My reasons for partitioning:
1) data is said to be safer on seperate partition
2) I'm interested in making a drive image, the software I own (acronis true image personal edition), will either back up the whole drive or a partition. This personal edition doesn't seem to have the function to deselect files on a drive/partition, so if I move all my data off to a seperate partition, it should be faster and take up alot fewer DVDRs to back up my OS partition.
I may be interested in installing linux (never done before). Let's say I make a partition into c: and d:
If i later make a partition for e: and install for example, Ubuntu, that would be OK? That would be good for my laptop, though for the desktop I might just install Ubuntu on a spare 2.5GB slave HD (assuming it'll fit, XP certainly does on that size). It's an experiment to get used to linux.
And if I want both 2k/xp and Linux to both be able to access a data partition (for example mp3's), what file system should the data partition use? I've heard NTFS has problems with Linux...
