Republicans would not have authorized the mission to kill bin Laden

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by HomerJS, Apr 30, 2012.

  1. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just to make sure everyone knows what was said and in what context:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080101233.html


    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/deanbarnett/2007/05/01/mitt_and_osama/print

    The Obama team is purposefully misrepresenting Romney's position.
     
  2. UberNeuman

    UberNeuman Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    161
    [​IMG]

    \shakeshakeshake... *duh*duh*duh*duh*da* shakeshakeshake...*duh*duh*duh*duh*da* shake your Romney... shake your Romney!
     
    #52 UberNeuman, Apr 30, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2012
  3. Rainsford

    Rainsford Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    17,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess I'm not exactly seeing the misrepresentation. Romney pretty clearly said he wasn't as focused on getting bin Laden as he was on going after terrorist groups as a whole. Nothing wrong with that, but his position was clearly not bin Laden focused. Obama also specifically said he'd unilaterally order troops into Pakistan if he had to...which he did. Both of those quotes seem accurately represented to me.

    That said, I don't think Republicans would have made a different choice to take out bin Laden if presented with one. The question, that we don't have an answer to and likely never will, is how much GETTING the opportunity to take bin Laden out had to do with Obama's policies and how much was just him being in a position to take advantage of an opportunity that would have come up anyways.
     
  4. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is in the thread title:

    Republicans would not have authorized the mission to kill bin Laden
     
  5. UberNeuman

    UberNeuman Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    161
    They wouldn't have done so.... it would take away the "boogeyman" threat....

    \OBL hiding in Pakistan had been in mind for a long time...
     
    #55 UberNeuman, Apr 30, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2012
  6. HomerJS

    HomerJS Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    9,834
    Likes Received:
    247
    Bin Laden was in Pakistan

    Romney said he would not have gone into Pakistan, therefore the order would not have been given when Romney was told he we know where he is.

    A few synapsis misfiring??
     
  7. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Quote him saying it without a bunch of the words missing. Also ensure you include the context of his statement.
     
  8. CallMeJoe

    CallMeJoe Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    If only this board had <irony> tags...
     
  9. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    He was suspected being there for a few years. It took a long time to prove it, as he was hidden away in an urban center and not in the hills and wilds as suspected.

    We had to be sure, so they tailed people for years until they had so much evidence he was there that even Jimmy Carter would have OK'd the attack.

    It was wise to wait, especially since we were confident he was not going anywhere. Better to wait and be right than to dash in and be wrong.
     
  10. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, I don't think Homer will provide an unedited and in context quote either. :)
     
  11. UberNeuman

    UberNeuman Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    161
    :D Reminds me of you misquoting President Clinton ages ago...

    \how's that USDA home loan working out for you?
     
  12. HomerJS

    HomerJS Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    9,834
    Likes Received:
    247
    I can't believe you are resorting to the Newt Gingrich defense
    This is like english based algebra

    Homer says "the moon is round"
    Cyber says "i disagree with Homer"
    Homer says "cyber says the moon is not round"
     
  13. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lack of quote means you did not quote him. Try again, this time actually supporting your position with facts.
     
  14. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Huh? Did you mix up your meds again?
     
  15. HomerJS

    HomerJS Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    9,834
    Likes Received:
    247
    Go ahead and keep denying the obvious.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Still no quote. Without a quote, you are a liar.
     
  17. UberNeuman

    UberNeuman Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    161
    Oh, prof.... you're transparent.... and i see you.....
     
  18. cybrsage

    cybrsage Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    :D I did not realize you were one of "those" people. You still trying to prove the Moon landing was fake too?
     
  19. UberNeuman

    UberNeuman Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes Received:
    161
    :D
     
  20. Ninjahedge

    Ninjahedge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,133
    Likes Received:
    0
    You see, you just don't GET IT!

    It is OK when 3000+ Americans are killed to beat the war drums and call for response.

    It just isn't OK to actually beat the man responsible. W/o him you have no reason to keep beating (off) the drums...
     
  21. nextJin

    nextJin Golden Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is a ridiculous argument, anyone would have went in to get him the Republicans would have just invaded Pakistan instead. You know, just to make sure.
     
  22. Atreus21

    Atreus21 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    9,357
    Likes Received:
    49
    Based on common sense and what a SEAL said. It'd be a no brainer. He's there for the taking.

    Didn't Clinton have multiple shots at Bin Laden too?
     
  23. xBiffx

    xBiffx Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    8,233
    Likes Received:
    1
    This thread is absolutely hilarious. Obama fanboys have to keep cheering and backing up their man with the only thing in his record that he thinks he can run on. Everything else is a disaster but this one time he said "GO" makes up for all the other shit. Even the Seals are giving him shit for turning this into political hay. He did nothing, I repeat nothing, more than any other sitting President would have done given the same opportunity.

    But go ahead liberals. Paint republicans as somehow pacifists in this regard who would have sat back and let OBL get away. Do you have any idea how dumb you sound saying that? On one hand, they are all warmongering criminals but on the other hand they are pacifist toadstools. Are you kidding me? I also love painting all republicans with a wide brush drawn from a misquote of one RINO. This has to be one of the biggest fail threads by Homer yet. But I can't blame you, you are following your master's orders and you actually believe that he can run on his record in November.

    What a joke.
     
  24. rudder

    rudder Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    19,310
    Likes Received:
    55
    Serving and former US Navy SEALs have slammed President Barack Obama for taking the credit for killing Osama bin Laden and accused him of using Special Forces operators as &#8216;ammunition&#8217; for his re-election campaign.

    The SEALs spoke out to MailOnline after the Obama campaign released an ad entitled &#8216;One Chance&#8217;.

    [..]

    Ryan Zinke, a former Commander in the US Navy who spent 23 years as a SEAL and led a SEAL Team 6 assault unit, said: &#8216;The decision was a no brainer. I applaud him for making it but I would not overly pat myself on the back for making the right call.

    &#8216;I think every president would have done the same. He is justified in saying it was his decision but the preparation, the sacrifice &#8211; it was a broader team effort.&#8217;

    Mr Zinke, who is now a Republican state senator in Montana, added that MR Obama was exploiting bin Laden&#8217;s death for his re-election bid. &#8216;The President and his administration are positioning him as a war president using the SEALs as ammunition. It was predictable.&#8217;

    [...]

    A serving SEAL Team member said: &#8216;Obama wasn&#8217;t in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because he speechwriters are smart.

    &#8216;But the more he tries to take the credit for it, the more the ground operators are saying, &#8220;Come on, man!&#8221; It really didn&#8217;t matter who was president. At the end of the day, they were going to go.&#8217;

    Chris Kyle, a former SEAL sniper with 160 confirmed and another 95 unconfirmed kills to his credit, said: &#8216;The operation itself was great and the nation felt immense pride. It was great that we did it.

    &#8216;But bin Laden was just a figurehead. The war on terror continues. Taking him out didn&#8217;t really change anything as far as the war on terror is concerned and using it as a political attack is a cheap shot.

    &#8216;In years to come there is going to be information that will come out that Obama was not the man who made the call. He can say he did and the people who really know what happened are inside the Pentagon, are in the military and the military isn&#8217;t allowed to speak out against the commander- in-chief so his secret is safe.&#8217;



    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...edit-bin-Laden-killing-election-campaign.html

    And yes, Clinton had the opportunity to kill Bin Laden. By 1998, the U.S. knew he had been responsible for terrorist act had tried him in abstentia for the first WTC bombing. The WTC bombing was followed by the U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa.

    &#8220;We will use all the means at our disposal to bring those responsible to justice, no matter what or how long it takes.&#8221; - Bill Clinton, 1998.

    The CIA knew with reasonable certainty where Bin Laden was. The white house at the time wanted him alive. Of course capture was too risky, especially with the Lewinski scandal and an upcoming election.

    So really the OP should edit his title and say "not all presidents would have wanted to authorize a mission to kill Bin Laden."
     
    #74 rudder, May 1, 2012
    Last edited: May 1, 2012
  25. FerrelGeek

    FerrelGeek Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    80
    But the OP is a partisan hack, so he'd never do that.

    The whole notion of this thread is utter fail. The SEAL's are correct. Obama is behaving like a grandstanding a$$, even some D's are implying that. Obama was pulled off of the golf course to make the decision. All he did was give the ok to go. Yes, it was the correct decision and I'm glad he made it, but so what? Obama should be celebrating the team that ran the mission, not himself. Completely classless.